1. Since October of last year, historian Dr. @vikramsampath has been subjected to a co-ordinated witch-hunt for merely presenting an evidence-based picture of Veer Savarkar, which he has the right to. It is important to understand the motivations behind the attacks on him.
2. Dr. Sampath's scholarship effectively upsets two Leftist myths - that the Left is the sole repository of scholarship and intellectualism, and that they alone shall decide for the rest of us as to who can be celebrated as icons. Thought Control is the end goal of the Left.
3. Unlike d partisan "scholarship" of d Left,Dr. Sampath's work is not a eulogy of Savarkar,but a dispassionate presentation of facts to bust popular myths. But since he has dared to undo the manufactured myths, he has upset some very powerful individuals, groups and interests.
4. What adds to the bile of the Left is Dr. Sampath's calm demeanour which was on full display during his debate at the India Today Conclave with Dr.Shashi Tharoor. No wonder they are keen on undermining his scholarly credibility to make an example out of him for the rest of us.
5. Having gone thru the representation of this cabal to the RHS against Dr. Sampath, I believe they have only strengthened his position because the so-called allegations don't stick legally. Unfortunately for the Left, this is their best case against Dr. Sampath's work.
6. Given Dr. Sampath's body of work, if the Left's best case is to attack the transcription by a third party of Dr. Sampath's speech delivered five years ago, well, either you are incompetent or you don't have a case in the first place or both, none of which reflects well on you.
7. From a big picture perspective, this is a sign of d tide turning since d Left's hubris,shallowness,mafiosi behaviour,inherent fascism & malice towards Bharatiyata are all being exposed thanks to its own conduct.I hope they continue to shoot themselves in d foot & elsewhere.
8. For those who run down scholarship and insist that "ground work" is the only work, this is a wake up call for you too. Here's an instance where a single individual's committed hard work has triggered an entire ecosystem & has dismantled d halo around "our eminent historians".
9. We need more scholars who can narrate our stories to us and the world without letting ideological positions come in the way of facts. That's the Indic/Dharmic way- Accept facts in their entirety and deal with them, don't invent a comfortable reality.
10. How do we support this intellectual movement? Start by buying books by individuals such as Dr. Sampath and encourage the youth to read their work.And if someone wishes to pursue d humanities from an Indic perspective, support such aspirations so that we produce more such ppl.
11. We need a sustained Intellectual/Bauddhika Movement for at least two generations to undo the damage caused by the Nehruvian Marxist clique which has taken forward and reinforced negative stereotypes about Bharat. Vocally support those who are committed to this Movement.
1. There is absolutely no substitute for Sanatana Dharma when it comes to spirituality, its understanding of consciousness and the essence of the human condition. The sheer range of options available to look inward depending on one's tendencies is astounding.
2. "Prayer" is merely the starting point in Sanatana Dharma. The layers & levels beyond that boggle d mind as to both the longevity & sagacity of this Civilisation which places such emphasis on spirituality. This is d knowledge that Dharma seeks to preserve, this is beejaraksha.
3. Given the attempts over millenia to unpack the layers of consciousness, and so that subsequent generations do not reinvent the wheel, the concept of a Sampradaya was put in place which roughly translates to tradition, whose strength is the fact that it has been time-tested.
1. I have no issues whatsoever wid ppl frm any side having issues wid wat I stand for or wat they think I stand for.Where I draw d line is on terms of engagement,platform for engagement & civility in engagement.I don't equate passionate yet civil disagreement wid personal malice.
2.I think SM in general & Twitter in particular encourages a certain degree of brashness of which I too have been guilty often. It helps to realise that there is life outside of Twitter & life is unpredictable.U never know who you might end up meeting under what circumstance.
3. Especially if you happen to be in your late teens and early twenties, do not let social media encourage a false sense of bravado. You have a life ahead of you and not everyone can be expected to be accommodative of brash behaviour. Find civil ways of expressing disagreement.
1. Mathams and Adheenams operate differently in Tamil Nadu. So to pontificate to the @KanchiMatham is to target this great institution and to reinforce Dravidianist anti-Brahmin vitriol.
2. The entire point of the opposition to the Dravidianist ideology is its targeting of Brahmins and misrepresentation of Mathams. Birth-based selection and training happens across the board in Mathams and Adheenams.
3. So if you don't have the guts to talk about non-Brahmin institutions, first grow a spine and find your voice to speak up even with respect to such institutions.
1. So the farm laws have been repealed and predictably, the reactions to it have become the test of fidelity/loyalty/fealty to the dispensation. Even legitimate expressions of disappointment lead to the same done to the death question- so will you vote for the opposition?!
2.If d constituents of a dispensation do not express their disappointment,who will?Not every expression of disappointment is a litmus test of ideological allegiance. In any case,apart frm ideological leanings,d reality of this country today is d absence of a credible alternative.
3. Precisely becoz there is no credible alternative to the current dispensation at the Centre,the constituents themselves have a duty to criticise where criticism is warranted, just as credit has been given where it is due. After all, what is the value of a shill's opinion?
1. Ever since the release of my book #IndiaThatisBharat and its positive reception,a few handles have increased their direct & sly attacks on me, which I think is a back-handed compliment. Their latest tirade rides on the back of my tweets from 2015 on the subject of caste.
2.Apparently I am supposed to b embarrassed that my views on caste have evolved.That my views evolved significantly after I took up d Sabarimala case is something I have myself stated at least on 2 occasions,once in a discussion wid @UnSubtleDesi & again in my recent CH session.
3. Here's d link to my discussion wid @UnSubtleDesi & @pratyasharath held last year during d lockdown where d specific subject was the tug of war between the so-called "trads" & "Raytas". To the trawlers,at 15.33,I specifically discuss my tweets of 2015 -
Took part in a Twitter spaces discussion on State Control of Temples a short while ago.Every time someone from d Left participates in a discussion on this topic,I am absolutely amazed at their factual ignorance & their desperate attempts to couch it in vague inanities. Terrible.
All they resort to are the same old done to death tropes about caste and demonising community stakeholdership without an iota of knowledge of the legal framework as it stands or the Constitutional position or the visible degradation of the Temple ecosystem under State control.
When confronted with facts, "Arre what's the point of discussing minutiae!", chalo let's discuss the legal framework "Arre too technical!", OK how about the Constitution "arre this issue goes beyond the Constitution!". Lol. Had it not been a serious issue this was funny as hell.