from 2020. More severe reinfections from a contraction of the Naive T cell population.
However, unpublished, I have suggested that harm to the CD8 repertoire could mean people were worse at fighting EBV, HPV, and some immunogenic cancers.
You've got to get out of the thought that t cell harm means opportunistic infections only
Immune dysfunction can come in many shapes and forms, autoimmunity, pathogenic priming, inflammation
Does not mean a hit would only manifest in opportunistic infections.
However, if Long Covid's stimulation and T cell aging is persistent, the sloughing could progress into the other subsets, not just Tn... but noone knows if that is the case
If that were the case it would be easily addressed bc it is not a retrovirus.
The Tn depletion could be self-limiting or progressive
Noone knows
They did find replicating virus in breast tissue
Could address reservoirs with antivirals
In acute infection, EBV and CMV reactivate (reads go up) transiently in the immune dysregulated state in a recent publication
This is a transient reactivation of Latent viruses due to acute T cell count drops
This is not a Primary infection with an opportunistic disease, like PCP pneumonia
This is a reactivation of latent virus in an acute state due to temporary hypoimmunity.
The trend reverses
So, do not go around saying "AJ can't be right bc we don't all have PCP pneumonia"
NO
All I was saying is that covid-19 reinfections can be worse due to loss of naive t cells and our future immunity can be harmed. Doesn't mean PCP pneumonia and Kaposi's!
However, the persistent Tn depletion that may be ongoing...
That is worth watching to see if it is self-limiting or progressive
If progressive, treat with antivirals.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My next foreshadowing is granular; the increased rate of severe disease in those with previously more moderate courses due to the loss of naive T cells in those without early, sera-mediated control of SARS Cov 2.
A solitary loss of naive T cells would not cause immunocompromise
On the contrary, it would cause immune overexuberance
My published statement is that Naive T cells dampen effector responses
You guys get another thing wrong. The T cell 'exhaustion'
In sars cov 2 infection, that is a way of preventing overshooting activation in the younger population.
These are, on the surface, paradoxes, until the mechanism is understood
SARS Cov 2 burns the T cells at both ends, killing terminally differentiated via FAS and precociously aging the Naive by bystander activation and the feed-forward controller, but this manifests in immune exuberance.
As soon as the preprint dropped we were on it and the usual minimizers tried to convince it was meaningless. Balloux, JasnahKholin, SZ, because they are on the side of the economic interests that want you to unmask to gain immunity by infection
We all know that doesn't work...
A lot of idiots think that you will gain immunity against this by infection, and if you are reminded that you are getting brain damaged you won't fall into their scam, so they minimize
Ultimately you will just save on pensions if you keep getting infected