A solitary loss of naive T cells would not cause immunocompromise
On the contrary, it would cause immune overexuberance
My published statement is that Naive T cells dampen effector responses
You guys get another thing wrong. The T cell 'exhaustion'
In sars cov 2 infection, that is a way of preventing overshooting activation in the younger population.
These are, on the surface, paradoxes, until the mechanism is understood
SARS Cov 2 burns the T cells at both ends, killing terminally differentiated via FAS and precociously aging the Naive by bystander activation and the feed-forward controller, but this manifests in immune exuberance.
In order to get immune compromise you would need the collapse of the absolute lymphocyte count. This is different from the differentiation status of the T cells in the blood.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To spell it out, this implies you roll the dice for severe disease (hospitalization) each subsequent time at equal rates. I am wondering if there will be decompensation with further breakthroughs.
My next foreshadowing is granular; the increased rate of severe disease in those with previously more moderate courses due to the loss of naive T cells in those without early, sera-mediated control of SARS Cov 2.
from 2020. More severe reinfections from a contraction of the Naive T cell population.
However, unpublished, I have suggested that harm to the CD8 repertoire could mean people were worse at fighting EBV, HPV, and some immunogenic cancers.