1) A quick update on what is happening on the ground. Short answer, not a lot of movement by the Russians over the last several days, except in the east. The Russians appear to consolidating their lines/logistics for pushes against Kiev, and in the east and south. Map from @BBC
2) The Russians continue to attempt to push into the suburbs of Kiev, although it is unclear if these are probing attacks or full assaults. The Ukrainians continue to put up stiff resistance. The Russians appear to be increasing the shelling of the capital.
3) From @nytimes: "Vitali Klitschko (mayor of Kiev), announced a 35-hour curfew ... which has seen an intensification of Russian bombardment... residents are not allowed to move around the city except with special permission or to go to a bomb shelter."
4) As noted the other day, young Ukrainian men are being recruited and trained in 3 days, then pushed to the front or near it. Keep in mind that in Kiev, the city is on the front line.
5) In short, the Ukrainians are preparing for a Russian assault on the capital. It is unclear if the Russians want to assault it, or starve it out. If the latter, the Russians have work to do, the southern door remains open.
6) The most worrying situation is in the far east, where Russian forces are close to encircling the region north of Luhansk. On the map you can see tendrils of Russian forces operating between Luhansk and Kharkiv. Also the Russians are pushing on Izium & Slovyansk (not shown).
7) Izium, Slovyansk, and Dnipro are key eastern cities to watch. The capture of Izium & Slovyansk would close off much of the region east of a line stretching from Kharkiv to Donetsk. The capture of Dnipro would essentially seal the fate of the entire east.
8) Russian troops are currently operating in villages outside of Izium. The mayor of Izium, from Ukrinform: “The city of Izium has been under siege for two weeks. No water, electricity, heat services, food, medicines, communication. The situation is not better than in Mariupol."
9) Continued, and note the second half of the sentence: "“The enemy is insidiously shelling the road towards Sloviansk, and the road towards Kharkiv is controlled by Russian occupiers." ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/343…
10) The Russians are also shaping the battlefield for a potential battle in Dnipro: From Ukriform: "Russian invaders fired missiles at Dnipro, destroying a runway and severely damaging infrastructure." The airport has only 1 runway... ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/343…
11) "'A runway was destroyed. A terminal was damaged. Large-scale destruction,'" Head of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional State Administration Valentyn Reznichenko posted on Facebook. Reznichenko noted that it would take a long time to restore the airport."
12) In the south, Mariupol remains defiant and under siege. Russia is preventing humanitarian relief. Russian forces appear to be expanding operations northwest of the city and are attempting to control the region.
13) Ukrainian forces in Mykolaiv also remain defiant and are putting up stiff resistance. The Russians appear to be working to surround the city. @CNN has a brief report with good details. cnn.com/europe/live-ne…
14) From @CNN: "Both bridges leading into Mykolaiv were raised Monday morning, according to CNN’s team on the ground, closing the main routes in and out of city as Russian presence is currently active in the north and southeast regions, essentially encircling it."
15) This likely means the Ukrainians blew the bridge leading to Odesa: "The bridge leading west to Odessa has now come down."
16) Russian forces continue to slowly march north from Mykolaiv, but it is unclear if they are moving towards Dnipro, Kiev, or Odesa, or some combination, or all 3. It is a long road to Kiev and Dnipro from there, that kind of operation would take weeks or months to develop ...
17) ... Cutting off Odesa is easier. But Ukrainian resistance has made little easy for the Russians.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) @nytimes most recent map illustrates many of the points made in yesterday's thread. However I think it understates Russian advances in the southeast. Polohy and the area around it is under Russian control.
2) Here is yesterday's update. I highlighted the importance of Izium and Dnipro. Add Kryvyi Rih to that list, which the Russians are pushing towards. If the Russians have success in Kryvyi Rih, it will open the back door to Dnipro and Zaporizhzha.
3) The @nytimes map shows how precarious the situation is in the northern part of the east. Russian troops have bypassed Kharkiv and are pushing into Izium, where there is fighting inside the town.
1) The Ukrainian military is training young men for three days, and putting them on the front lines. There is just no way you can teach a person how to be a soldier in 3 days, and expect him to survive what is to come. bbc.com/news/world-eur…
2) Some quotes from the @BBC article: "I got used to my gun. I learned how to shoot and how to act in the battle, also many other things that will be very crucial in the fight with the Russians."
3) "I feel much more confident than I was before, because we get enough knowledge in tactics, in martial arts, in tactical medicine and in how to do something on the battlefield."
Let's be clear, you cannot become even moderately proficient in any of those tasks in 3 days.
1) @nytimes continues to publish its excellent battle maps. This series focuses on 3 fronts: Kiev, Kharkiv, and the wider south. I will also look at the east/Donbas front.
2) First, Kiev. Russian forces don't appear to have made major gains here, but appear to be positioning for an assault or siege of the capital. The mayor of Chernihiv said the city is now surrounded. Russian forces appear to be bypassing the city & are pushing southward to Kiev.
3) Chernihiv province is close to being enveloped. The Russian column in the northeast that we've heard so much about is reported to be fanning out across the countryside & deploying artillery/rocket launchers that oriented at the capital.
1) On urban warfare. This in no way should be interpreted as a defense of Russian-inflicted civilian casualties (it will anyway), which I condemn. The harsh reality is that when you decide to defend cities, you will incur civilian casualties & damage to civilian infrastructure.
2) Both sides chose to fight in an urban setting. From Mayor Vitali Klitschko: "Kyiv has been transformed into a fortress. Every street, every building, every checkpoint has been fortified." bbc.com/news/live/worl…
3) There are numerous photographs & videos from the capital and other cities that show armed checkpoints and defensive positions in or around civilian buildings & areas. I've seen video of Ukrainian troops firing anti-tank missiles from apartment building rooftops.
1) On Russian generals dying in battle. This is going to be perceived as a "pro Russian" threat, but it isn't. Ukraine is claiming that it has killed the 2nd Russian general , this is being touted as evidence of a defeated Russian military. It isn't. thehill.com/policy/interna…
2) The Russians are having problems among its front line units. When this happens, senior officers should move to the front to deal with it. This can often fix things. It appears this is what the Russians are going.
3) Leading from the front isn't something a cowardly or incompetent commander does. Leading from the front means you risk dying at the front.
10) ... it makes sense the Russians will hold a line stretching south from the west of of Kiev down to somewhere along the Moldavian border (Transnistria). Or west of a line along the M05 highway. This would completely cut off Ukraine from the Black Sea, a strategic objective.
11) The M05 highway runs north-south from Kiev to Odesa. Again this is an operation that would take weeks or months to develop. But if Kiev falls this changes the timeline calculus.
12) Kiev is without a doubt a strategic objective for the Russians but by no means the only objective. A look at the RUSMIL offensive shows this operation was not launched in haste because Kiev didn't fall and Zelensky didn't capitulate on day 2.