To spell it out, this implies you roll the dice for severe disease (hospitalization) each subsequent time at equal rates. I am wondering if there will be decompensation with further breakthroughs.
My next foreshadowing is granular; the increased rate of severe disease in those with previously more moderate courses due to the loss of naive T cells in those without early, sera-mediated control of SARS Cov 2.
A solitary loss of naive T cells would not cause immunocompromise
On the contrary, it would cause immune overexuberance
My published statement is that Naive T cells dampen effector responses
You guys get another thing wrong. The T cell 'exhaustion'
In sars cov 2 infection, that is a way of preventing overshooting activation in the younger population.
These are, on the surface, paradoxes, until the mechanism is understood
SARS Cov 2 burns the T cells at both ends, killing terminally differentiated via FAS and precociously aging the Naive by bystander activation and the feed-forward controller, but this manifests in immune exuberance.
from 2020. More severe reinfections from a contraction of the Naive T cell population.
However, unpublished, I have suggested that harm to the CD8 repertoire could mean people were worse at fighting EBV, HPV, and some immunogenic cancers.