I’ve been noodling with this @jackshafer piece this afternoon. Parts of it ring true. But other parts fundamentally are at odds with my lived experience.
I’ll say this with background up front: I’ve spent months of my life around the U.S. military as a journalist in Afghanistan. I’ve seen ambushes launched, IEDs explode, airstrikes land, etc.
My experiences aren’t particularly remarkable in that regard, either. There’s a generation of us journalists out there, and there’s always *someone* who saw something louder, crazier, scarier, darker.
On a personal level, that stuff is significant. But there’s more to the puzzle. It’s also divorces, 3 a.m. text messages from struggling friends, and Gold Star families who stay in touch and wonder how America moved on so quickly from previous conflicts.
“War sells,” this piece says.
Certainly, there is a ton of attention on the front end of a new one. People want to understand something awful like this, in my experience.
That changes over time, though. Ask those of us who covered Afghanistan in 2015, 2016, 2018, etc. Journalists who did write about that war in those years found a readership that was often disinterested.
What kind of attention will Ukraine get in two years? Not sure, but it’s probably worth talking about.
The U.S. hasn’t even finished sorting out the refugee situation in Afghanistan, all these months later.
“War reporting is easy,” this piece says, while allowing that it takes courage. I have found the opposite to be true.
There are so very many gaps in knowledge while covering conflict, making it incredibly difficult to be accurate. It’s wise to be humble about that.
Was that a missile that crashed into that building? Artillery fire? A spiraling plane that had just been shot down?
Hard to say, especially when you’re relying on people going through trauma as sources.
I’ve been at the Pentagon for this one and tried to help people understand from here. One of the things I’ve had to say in response to questions is: I’m not sure.
The ongoing discussion about Russian casualties is one example. Numbers appear to be in the thousands but have ranged wildly, and U.S. officials have said they have low confidence in the estimates they have disclosed. That’s just where we are.
I am so incredibly thankful for my colleagues who are braving missiles and everything else to tell this story.
And I am confident that we’re going to be sorting through the baggage, confusion and difficulties of this war for a long, long time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A backgrounder briefing with a senior U.S. defense official at the Pentagon about the Russian war in Ukraine has just concluded. It’s Day 26 of the invasion.
Some takeaways:
As noted widely in the media, fighting in and around Mariupol is fierce, the senior defense official says. It remains isolated.
Seizing Mariupol is significant to the Russians because it will provide Putin with a land bridge to Crimea, cut off Ukrainian forces there from the rest of the country, and provide the Russians with a new port, senior U.S. defense official says.
No Pentagon background briefing today about the war in Ukraine as @SecDef and his senior staff are traveling.
They did just release this update, though:
@SecDef "This is Day 23 of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Russians remain largely stalled across the country."
"Near Kyiv, we still observe Russian forces have not made significant advances toward the city in the north/north west. And to the east of Kyiv, we have observed no movement of Russian forces."
A background briefing with a senior U.S. defense official about the Russian war on Ukraine has just concluded. It’s Day 22 of the invasion.
Much remains the same:
Russia’s advances are largely still stalled. One exception: Pentagon assesses Thursday for the first time that the Russians have seized Izyum, a town southeast of Kharkiv and north of Mariupol.
Russia want to cut off eastern Ukraine from rest of country, U.S. official says.
Front end of beleaguered Russian convoy north of Kyiv remains outside city. But Russian forces have moved up artillery, the senior defense official said, as Russia appears to be readying additional fires.
“They’re trying to wear the city down,” senior defense official says.
Upshot of @SecDef in Slovakia, per presser: Slovakia says it's willing to provide Ukraine with S-300 air defense, but wants assurances that they'll be provided with some other system to defend themselves.
SECDEF, asked if the U.S. could provide Slovakia a Patriot or some other air-defense system:
"I don’t have any announcements for you this afternoon. These are things that we will continue to work with all of our allies on..."
Slovakian defense minister: "“Should there be a situation where there is a proper replacement or if we have a capability guaranteed for a certain period of time, then we would be willing to discuss the future of S-300 system.”
A background briefing about the Russian war on Ukraine with a senior U.S. defense official has just concluded.
It’s Day 21 of the invasion, and there are a few significant updates:
First, the Pentagon assesses today that Russian warships are now shelling areas around Odessa, a major port city in southwestern Ukraine.
Other naval activity also has increased, with Russian landing craft moving around but not going ashore, the senior defense official said.
It’s still unclear if Russia will attempt an amphibious landing on or near Odessa. Russia launched one amphibious landing farther east early in the landing, but it was small and on an uncontested shoreline, the senior defense official said.
With @SecDef and his team in transit to Europe today, there is no background briefing at the Pentagon today about the war in Ukraine. The Pentagon has just released this, though:
"On day 20 of Russia’s war, we continue to assess limited to no progress by Russian ground forces in achieving their objectives."
"Kyiv remains under bombardment by long range fires, with civilian targets - to include residential areas - being struck with increasing frequency. But leading elements of Russian forces have not appreciably advanced on the city."