In 2019 @MForstater’s contract to work for an economic think tank was not renewed after some in that organisation complained she was transphobic, following her tweets and proposal to blog about the reality of sex and importance of women’s rights.
Further complaints appeared to be that she left a leaflet from @fairplaywomen on her desk and ‘misgendered’ a person outside the organisation, who presented as a man but wished to be known as non binary.
Maya took the think tank to an Employment Tribunal who threw her case out in 2020, claiming that her belief in the reality of sex was ‘Not Worthy of Respect in a Democratic Society’ [NWORIDS] and thus she could not claim any protection from discrimination on the basis of this.
Maya appealed and won in June 2021 when the EAT declared her belief was Worthy Of Respect In A Democratic Society [WORIADS] but warned against ‘gratuitous and indiscriminate’ ‘Misgendering’. Maya was clear she would use preferred pronouns unless context demanded otherwise.
The matter then proceeded to a further employment tribunal to determine if Maya legally qualifies as a person who is protected by employment legislation (think tank say no, she wasn’t ‘staff’) and if so, did the think tank unlawfully discriminate against her protected belief.
Evidence has so far been heard from Maya and four employees of the think tank. What has emerged has been deeply troubling. It appears that due to vocal and persistent complaints against Maya that she was ‘offensive’, it was felt easier to just get rid of her.
It appears that none of the employees understood what she was saying and their analysis did not go much beyond reliance on use of word ‘offensive’. Thus it was never made clear to Maya exactly what she had done wrong or what she could do to make amends.
Evidence and submissions will continue next week. I do not know when we will get a judgment. I hope it will confirm that Maya was victim of unlawful discrimination and I hope will make comment about the very poor practices of the think tank.
If you are interested in more details, they are here

hiyamaya.net
Many people are interested - 21 million so far.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Phillimore

Sarah Phillimore Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SVPhillimore

Mar 19
As the #ForstaterTribunal so clearly illuminates, we can’t dismiss this as simple trolling. It seems a great number of people, some with the power to sack you, no longer believe that words have any meaning beyond their subjective determination.
I can accept that people may have different levels of tolerance as to what they consider ‘transphobia’. But the definition of ‘female’ could not be clearer. It’s the person with the potential to produce large gametes.
Whatever your views on the importance of gender identity ideology, however cruel you consider ‘Misgendering’ you cannot assert a male body is in reality a female body, without destroying the basis for language and communication.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 17
Adopted children in England at least go to their adoptive home with their ‘life story book’. They know who their biological parents are and many will seek them out when older.
This does not mean of course that adoptive parents are not ‘real parents’. But most of us are interested in who made us, the two people who each contributed DNA. Male and female.
This doesn’t mean, of course, that a baby born of a surrogate mother won’t have a long and happy life with the parents who paid for him or her. But your mother is not nothing. She made half of you, she gestated all of you. Her voice was the first you heard.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17
At ⁦@SpeechUnion⁩ launch of Jacob Mchangama’s book - he also has a podcast! podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/cle…
Importance of scholarship around these issues says @Fox_Claire we know that the first casualty of war is truth. Censorship becoming more prevalent in the UK. Have to defend people’s right to say daft things. The Online Harms Bill is one of greatest threats in modern times.
This is the here and now. Fantastic thing about this book is the wide sweep of history - it is international and global.
Read 32 tweets
Mar 15
Well done @MForstater for revealing exactly what is going on. It is now for others to ask themselves if this is a road that it is safe to go down - where one group’s assertions about reality define it for everyone else
This is a serious question requiring serious thought. Because the amount of energy and time you will need to spend dealing with those who reject one conception of ‘reality’ will be immense. There will be many court cases.
And you wont be able to confine this approach to simply issues around ‘gender identity’. Those to whom you give the power to redefine reality will use it. For any issue they wish. Poster refers to @MForstater as ‘Sue’ - assume means ‘she’ but who knows any more?
Read 8 tweets
Mar 14
And here we have it. To challenge another’s identity is to render them a ‘corpse’ - without YOUR compelled belief in their ‘identity’ they cannot even live.

When did this start being pushed as a sensible way for anyone to engage with the world?
And so we inch towards understanding. Bringing in discussion of Rachel Dolezal ‘offensive’ - presumably because many are not yet ready to concede ‘trans racialism’.
When objecting to yet another EDI questionnaire that requested I inform it whether my gender now was the same as the one I was assigned at birth, I replied that this was as offensive as asking me if my disability was assigned at birth.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 14
Lack of knowledge of the law is a serious thing. The person who assaulted @Belstaffie accepted a caution. This means they admitted they had committed an assault. This will be on the Police National Computer and will build up solid picture of patterns of criminal behaviour.
You would not know this from the comments of their supporters however. These people are not being good friends to this assailant. Encouraging and empowering people to think physical attacks are noble and necessary, leads no where good.
If the police continue to investigate women for stickering, they need to give the attention these physical assaults deserve. Because there is your ‘escalation’.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(