Share this page!

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Twitter logo
Mar 21 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Been puzzling about this U.K. MOD intelligence update since it was released this morning. In particular the last point that Kyiv is still the top priority for the Russians and they will ‘prioritise’ attempts to surround and take the city.
U.K. intelligence has been pretty good throughout, though this seems at odds with recent reporting and surmising that the Russians are turning to a southern and eastern strategy or a ratcheting down of Russian maximalist demands.
Also seems that Russian forces have moved sparingly to the northwest and northeast of Kyiv (this map has not changed for more than a week). If anything reports are that Russian forces are taking up more defensive positions.
Kyiv is also now extremely well defended. So on the surface a major assault to surround and take the city seems very risky and potentially enormously costly for the Russians. They will also have to bring in lots or fresh forces and supplies (haven’t seen any sign)
If they do try and go for Kyiv, it’s a sign that the strategic dysfunction at the top has not been corrected.
US saying the same thing as the U.K. MOD. Russians going for Kyiv as their highest priority. Can’t see them taking Kyiv with anything like the force they have in the area now. Bizarre.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Mar 23
A very quick thread on those talking about Russia settling in for a long war and mobilising it’s resources for an extended campaign. Could they do it: possibly, but it would be a very different war with major societal implications.
The Russian Army is actually not that large. It’s around 900,000, which sounds big (though for a country of Russia’s size it’s very thinly spread) but about a third is conscript and many of the ‘professionals’ are on 12 month contracts. csis.org/blogs/post-sov…
We have pretty good intelligence that the Russians have deployed 75% of their best fighting formations to Ukraine (these are the ones wasting away now). Maybe they send the other 25%, but even that won’t make much of a difference in the short term.
Read 9 tweets
Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Mar 23
This is worth confirming. Russian ammo use is already far higher than anything they could have planned for and a large dump in Luhansk should be one of their most important ones for the fighting in the east. If the Ukrainians can start targeting Russian dumps it will matter.
@thetimes has a piece on ammunition shortages that are starting to bite for the Ukrainians too. Not surprising. To give you an idea of the use rate of ammo in war being far higher than anyone expected, the Ukrainians are saying that they are using a weeks supply in 20 hour Image
So both sides will be feeling the crunch, and whoever has the better functioning supply/logistics system will have a significant edge. So far three things seem to be favoring the Ukrainians. 1) the have generally lighter weapons which makes resupply somewhat less complex
Read 6 tweets
Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Mar 22
The most interesting/important story of the morning in terms of how the war might develop. The Ukrainian military is claiming that the logistics crisis that the Russians have been operating under since the start of the war is reaching acute crisis. see @guardian Image
Almost all military's have a supply crunch not long after the start of a war, as they usually under-estimate (sometimes spectacularly) the amount of stuff they will need to fight the war. War is so destructive that it consumes far more than people can imagine ahead of time.
One of the most famous of these supply crises was the First World War shell crisis which beset everyone. After only a few months of war the expenditure of ammunition was so much higher than expected, that artillery shells ran out and had to be rationed. encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/shells…
Read 9 tweets
Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Mar 21
These stories have been coming in all morning. Would be surprising if Ukraine had the heavy forces available there to attack the Russian army to the northeast of Kyiv. But if they continue pressing, the Ukrainians could wreak havoc on Russian communications and supply
Ukrainian Army is now publicly claiming that they have liberated Makariv, which is the southerly of the two town in that map. So there seems to be something happening in this area.
Two big ifs. IF Kyiv is still the number 1 priority for the Russians and IF the below story is true, then this is by far the most important military development on the ground during the last few days. That inert Russian force to the northeast of Kyiv could be in big trouble
Read 14 tweets
Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Mar 21
What happens around Mariupol in the next few days should reveal alot about the state of the Russian Army--in a ghastly way. The 'demand' that the city be surrendered was really a plea. Saying to the Ukrainians, 'we really dont want to send our army into the town.'
This Ukrainian rejection will force the Russians to do the one thing they have so far been very reluctant to do in this campaign--go into a defended city. This is precisely because by their own actions, they have allowed the Ukrainians time to prepare.
The Russians have so far continued what they have been doing, long-distance bombardment. But that doesnt help them much at this point as theyve already blown up most of the city.
Read 8 tweets
Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture
Mar 20
Ok, some people have asked for a summary of my views on war (why my analysis of the Ukraine war has been so pointed), so I thought I would make this thread with reference to my research (where possible free or library access material).
My view of war is in many ways profoundly boring. War is a struggle about the control of communications--which run from the raw materials needed to produce a good until that good is delivered to the battlefield.
It argues that the focus on bravery/cowardice of destruction/tragedy while compelling as a human story, tells us nothing of value about why wars are won and lost.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @PhillipsPOBrien has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @PhillipsPOBrien!

Read all threads by @PhillipsPOBrien

:(