Republicans like Hawley continue to smear Judge Jackson’s record using thoroughly debunked misrepresentations about her sentencing record. Yet recently, they missed a real opportunity to stand up for survivors of sexual abuse—reauthorizing #VAWA. (thread) nytimes.com/2022/03/21/us/…
Less than two weeks ago, many Republican Senators in the room today joined Senator Hawley in voting against a legislative package that included a reauthorization and update of the Violence Against Women Act—a law that protects and assists victims of sexual and domestic violence.
When the cameras are on, some Republicans like Hawley make grand claims about protecting survivors—at Judge Jackson’s expense.
But when push came to shove, and it was their time to vote or cosponsor this bipartisan bill, many did not step up and actually take steps to help survivors by supporting VAWA.
Rather than launching baseless attacks against Judge Jackson, some Senate Republicans in this room should explain why they failed to support VAWA and its protections for victims of sexual and domestic abuse.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Senate Judiciary Committee

Senate Judiciary Committee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JudiciaryDems

Mar 25
The Republican Leader's opposition to the first Black woman nominated to the Supreme Court must be based on some alternative set of facts—because he said himself she is "clearly qualified."

HERE are the facts ⬇️
On court packing: The size of #SCOTUS is up to Congress, not SCOTUS itself and certainly not Judge Jackson. When then-Judge Barrett was asked about Court expansion, she herself said “That is a question left open to Congress” and that she “couldn’t opine on it.”
On judicial philosophy: Now-Chief Justice Roberts during his SCOTUS confirmation hearing: “I do not have an overarching judicial philosophy that I bring to every case.” Judge Jackson went further and clearly explained her approach to decisionmaking on the bench.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 23
Important FACT CHECK re: the First Step Act—a landmark bipartisan Durbin/Grassley-led criminal justice reform bill.

Yesterday, the junior Senator from Arkansas questioned Judge Jackson about a case dealing with the First Step Act’s compassionate release provision. (thread)
In that case, Judge Jackson reduced the sentence of Keith Young, finding that a significant change in the law after he was sentenced was an “extraordinary and compelling” circumstance that justified compassionate release.
Judge Jackson considered multiple factors in her decision, including Mr. Young’s serious medical conditions, his limited criminal history, and good behavior in prison. And she reduced his sentence but did not end it—he will not be released until March 2028.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 23
"The overwhelming majority of Senators were asking appropriate questions...and respectful of the nominee before us. But for many Senators, yesterday was an opportunity to showcase talking points for the November election."

Chair @SenatorDurbin starts today with a FACT CHECK ⬇️
False claim 1: All Democrats are "soft on crime."

Durbin to Jackson: "You made a mess of their stereotype… Law enforcement is on your side because you've been on their side at critical moments... So the soft on crime charge, which leads all others, falls on its face."
False claim 2: Judge Jackson is out of the mainstream when it comes to child pornography cases.

Durbin: "You are in the same place as 80% of federal judges [in District of DC cases] when it comes to sentencing on child pornography cases...You're in the mainstream of sentencing."
Read 6 tweets
Mar 14
NEWS: The Judiciary Committee has officially noticed the hearing entitled “The Nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.”

More information on timing and details in this thread ⬇️
The hearings will begin on Monday, March 21 at 11:00 AM ET with statements from Committee members (10 minutes each), the individuals who will introduce Judge Jackson (5 minutes each), and Judge Jackson herself (10 minutes).
Questioning of Judge Jackson will begin on Tuesday, March 22 at 9:00 AM ET. Members will have the opportunity to ask questions for 30 minutes each, in order of seniority.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 2
BREAKING NEWS: Chair @SenatorDurbin has notified the Judiciary Committee that the hearings to consider the nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court will begin on Monday, March 21, and will last four days.
The hearings will begin on Monday, March 21, with statements from Committee members, the individuals who will introduce Judge Jackson, and Judge Jackson herself. Questioning will begin on Tuesday, March 22 and continue on Wednesday, March 23.
The Committee will also meet in closed session on Wednesday, March 23 to discuss any matters relating to the nominee’s FBI background investigation. The Committee does this for every Supreme Court nominee, regardless of whether the background investigation has raised concerns.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 6
On the anniversary of the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, it's important to understand how we got here: violent extremism fueled by Trump’s Big Lie.

WHAT WE FOUND in our investigation into former President Trump’s campaign to pressure DOJ to overturn the election. ⬇️
On Jan 22, @ktbenner reported that Acting AAG Jeffrey Clark sought to involve DOJ in efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results & plotted with then-President Trump to oust Acting AG Jeffrey Rosen, who reportedly refused Trump’s demands. /1
nytimes.com/2021/01/22/us/…
Two days later, @JessBravin & @sgurman reported that Trump had urged DOJ to file a lawsuit in the Supreme Court seeking to invalidate President Biden’s victory. /2
wsj.com/articles/trump…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(