They are all in on eviscerating the civil rights regime that has been established since the 1960s.

Republicans want nothing less than to turn back the clock to at least the 1950s. Unquestioned white Christian patriarchal authority. That’s the vision.
Ban abortion, contraception, interracial marriage; criminalize LGBTQ people.

Install an authoritarian white nationalist education system, ban dissent.

Restrict voting rights, purge election commissions.

These are not disparate actions.
The reactionary counter-mobilization against democracy is happening on so many fronts simultaneously that it’s easy to lose sight of how things are connected. But they absolutely are connected, and we need to focus on the big picture.
These Republican initiatives are all directly tied to the broader struggle over whether or not America should finally realize the promise of multiracial, pluralistic democracy. That’s the defining conflict.
The overriding concern for conservatives is to maintain traditional political, social, cultural, and economic hierarchies. It’s a vision that serves, first and foremost, a wealthy white elite - and all those who cling to traditional white Christian patriarchal authority.
It’s a political project that goes well beyond Congress and state legislatures: This is about restoring and entrenching white Christian patriarchal dominance and authority in the local community, in the public square, in the workplace, in the family.
The American Right is fully committed to this anti-democratic, anti-pluralistic project, and the Republican Party has a comprehensive strategy to put it into practice - especially at the state level where the reactionary assault is accelerating the most.
A lot of people are saying “More like 1850 or 1750 they want to go back to!” I get where the reaction is coming from - but look at the reality in many states, especially in the South, in the 1950s: No need to go further back to find authoritarian white Christian patriarchal rule.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Mar 24
“Heated exchange”

White man yells at Black woman in a mixture of reactionary rage and bad faith, intending to undermine and sabotage her candidacy for a position for which she is supremely qualified; Black woman answers calmly and substantively. “Heated exchange.”

Just bizarre.
This is a major issue. This type of framing is not only factually inadequate, it also builds on and perpetuates the pervasive idea of #BothSides being to blame for “Washington” being a dysfunctional mess - a narrative that strongly privileges the Right’s assault on government.
It’s getting really hard for me to believe that there should still be people at these media outlets who are simply unaware of what they’re doing and oblivious to the disastrous effects. A lot more plausible to assume that this type of framing is the result of a deliberate choice.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 23
These reactions from the Right are as shocking as they are utterly unsurprising. Whether or not it has any immediate effect on the Supreme Court’s decisions: To a reactionary white patriarchal movement, a Black woman rising is always going to be an acute threat.
A few weeks ago, I wrote about the conservative reactions to Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court in my @GuardianUS column. They reveal a lot about the conservative psyche and the pervasive siege mentality on the Right:
We need to start by acknowledging how flat-out racist and sexist these reactions are - so revealing precisely because they are so immediate, so reflexive. Misogynoir is the best term to capture the core of what is happening here.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 21
Why do so many Republicans consider Joe Biden’s presidency illegitimate?

Conservatives don’t necessarily think the 2020 election was stolen. But they believe democracy itself has betrayed America, by allowing the “wrong” people to take charge.

My new column for @GuardianUS:
If we are trying to understand what is animating the Right’s rapidly accelerating radicalization against democracy, binary assumptions of Republicans either being true believers or power-hungry cynics are not very helpful and actually obscure more than they illuminate.
What we really need to grapple with is why so many Republicans are convinced the outcome of the election was illegitimate *regardless* of whether or not there were specific procedural irregularities.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 18
The NYT editorial board thinks “America Has a Free Speech Problem” – and presents a purely mythical idea of what “free speech” is, an a-historical tale of the country’s past, and a narrative that is detached from the current reality of the political conflict.

Some thoughts: 1/ Image
First of all, the editorial perpetuates a misleading myth of what “free speech” is. They initially define it as the right of the people “to speak their minds and voice their opinions in public without fear of being shamed or shunned.” Such a right has never existed anywhere. 2/ Image
Deep into the piece, the editorial board acknowledges that this is actually not what “free speech” means, and that the Constitution defines it, in their words, as “freedom from government restrictions on expression.” 3/ Image
Read 21 tweets
Mar 17
Great thread by @LarryGlickman pushing back against the idea that Trump ran as a “moderate” in 2016.

I’ll add one thought: If we want to explain Trump’s appeal, isolating his supposed socio-economic “moderation” from the context of white grievance politics is misleading.
As @LarryGlickman shows, Trump’s occasional nods to preferring “moderation” on financial / socio-economic / entitlements issues were always in contrast with his actual policy platform. And even those disingenuous nods did not come in a vacuum, but as part of a larger promise.
That core promise at the heart of the Trumpian political project was to uphold white patriarchal dominance by whatever means necessary, to mobilize the state in order to put those pesky special-interest “identity groups” in their place. This is America, after all!
Read 9 tweets
Mar 15
Why does the “cancel culture” idea play such an outsized role in liberal / mainstream media coverage?

We need to look at both ideological and structural factors: a confluence of reactionary centrism and a system that incentivizes #BothSides “balance” above all else.
Reactionary centrism is the ideology that animates many of the people who shape media coverage. A disproportionate percentage of those people are white men, and the fact that elite white men face a little more scrutiny today than in the past has caused quite a bit of anxiety.
#metoo is another excellent example of this dynamic: As soon as traditionally marginalized groups gain enough power and enough of a platform to make their demands for respect and accountability heard, certain white people (predominantly men) start bemoaning “persecution.”
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(