Why do so many Republicans consider Joe Biden’s presidency illegitimate?

Conservatives don’t necessarily think the 2020 election was stolen. But they believe democracy itself has betrayed America, by allowing the “wrong” people to take charge.

My new column for @GuardianUS:
If we are trying to understand what is animating the Right’s rapidly accelerating radicalization against democracy, binary assumptions of Republicans either being true believers or power-hungry cynics are not very helpful and actually obscure more than they illuminate.
What we really need to grapple with is why so many Republicans are convinced the outcome of the election was illegitimate *regardless* of whether or not there were specific procedural irregularities.
It is a core tenet of the Republican worldview to consider the Democratic Party as not simply a political opponent, but an enemy pursuing an “Un-American” project of turning what is supposed to be a white Christian patriarchal nation into a land of godless multiracial pluralism.
Even if they don’t subscribe to the more outlandish conspiracies propagated by the Trumpists, many Republicans agree that the Democratic Party is a fundamentally illegitimate political faction that must not be allowed to govern.
Republicans didn’t start from an assessment of how the 2020 election went down and came away from that exercise with sincerely held doubts. The rationalization works backwards: They looked at the outcome and decided it must not stand.
In other words, accusations of fraud gain plausibility among conservatives not because of empirical evidence, but because they adhere to the “higher truth” of who is and who is not legitimately representing – and therefore entitled to rule – “real” America.
It is worth paying attention to how reactionary intellectuals have been dealing with the 2020 election, as they tend to articulate the radicalizing authoritarian spirit that is threatening American democracy in strikingly stark terms.
In March 2021, the rightwing magazine American Mind published an essay by Claremont Institute affiliate Glenn Ellmers, entitled “’Conservatism’ is no Longer Enough.” It provides a particularly instructive window into the energies and anxieties that are animating conservatives.
Ellmers makes no claim that the 2020 election was “stolen,” he doesn’t allege manipulation, voter fraud, or conspiracy; he explicitly acknowledges that more people voted for Joe Biden than for Donald Trump. And yet, he maintains that the outcome must not be accepted.
According to Ellmers, Biden’s presidency represents an “Un-American” idea of multiracial pluralism – something that is fundamentally in conflict with what he refers to as “authentic America.”
In his view, everyone who voted for Joe Biden and his “progressive project of narcotizing the American people and turning us into a nation of slaves” is also “Un-American” and therefore not worthy of inclusion in the body politic.
Ellmers declares that “most people living in the United States – certainly more than half – are not Americans in any meaningful sense of the term.” Only “authentic Americans” allowed in Glenn Ellmers’ United States – a clearly racialized idea of “the people.”
Ellmers’ racist, anti-pluralistic vision is remarkably radical: He wants to redraw the boundaries of citizenship and exclude over half the population. If you support multiracial pluralism, you automatically forfeit the right to be considered a member of the American polity.
Ellmers is outraged precisely because he accepts the fact that a majority voted for Joe Biden, that “authentic Americans” have become the minority in a county which they are supposedly entitled to dominate.
This provides a striking window into the depth of despair, the pervasive siege mentality on the Right: What’s scandalous about the 2020 election, in this interpretation, is not that it was “stolen,” but that the “Un-American” forces straightforwardly won.
Reactionaries are disputing the legitimacy of the 2020 election not necessarily on the basis of claiming fraud and conspiracy – but because democracy itself subverted the will of “real America” by allowing the “wrong” people too much of an influence on the fate of the country.
Trump’s incessant lies represent a vulgar, clumsy, narcissistic strand of conspiratorial thinking. It is shared by some, opportunistically used by many – and widely accepted on the Right because it adheres to a “higher truth”: “We” are entitled to rule in America.
That’s what is behind the widespread support for, or willingness to accept, any kind of suspicion, regardless of whether or not there is any shred of empirical evidence. If an election doesn’t result in “Us” being in power, it must be illegitimate, as we are “real America.”
Whether or not Republicans “actually believe” conspiracy theories about the 2020 election: most of them are absolutely convinced the result was illegitimate – and they are all too willing to use allegations of fraud if it helps prevent future “illegitimate” outcomes.
It is precisely the mix of deeply held ideological convictions of what “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America is and who gets to rule here and the cynical opportunism with which these beliefs are enforced that makes the assault on democracy so dangerous.

More here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Mar 22
They are all in on eviscerating the civil rights regime that has been established since the 1960s.

Republicans want nothing less than to turn back the clock to at least the 1950s. Unquestioned white Christian patriarchal authority. That’s the vision.
Ban abortion, contraception, interracial marriage; criminalize LGBTQ people.

Install an authoritarian white nationalist education system, ban dissent.

Restrict voting rights, purge election commissions.

These are not disparate actions.
The reactionary counter-mobilization against democracy is happening on so many fronts simultaneously that it’s easy to lose sight of how things are connected. But they absolutely are connected, and we need to focus on the big picture.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 18
The NYT editorial board thinks “America Has a Free Speech Problem” – and presents a purely mythical idea of what “free speech” is, an a-historical tale of the country’s past, and a narrative that is detached from the current reality of the political conflict.

Some thoughts: 1/ Image
First of all, the editorial perpetuates a misleading myth of what “free speech” is. They initially define it as the right of the people “to speak their minds and voice their opinions in public without fear of being shamed or shunned.” Such a right has never existed anywhere. 2/ Image
Deep into the piece, the editorial board acknowledges that this is actually not what “free speech” means, and that the Constitution defines it, in their words, as “freedom from government restrictions on expression.” 3/ Image
Read 21 tweets
Mar 17
Great thread by @LarryGlickman pushing back against the idea that Trump ran as a “moderate” in 2016.

I’ll add one thought: If we want to explain Trump’s appeal, isolating his supposed socio-economic “moderation” from the context of white grievance politics is misleading.
As @LarryGlickman shows, Trump’s occasional nods to preferring “moderation” on financial / socio-economic / entitlements issues were always in contrast with his actual policy platform. And even those disingenuous nods did not come in a vacuum, but as part of a larger promise.
That core promise at the heart of the Trumpian political project was to uphold white patriarchal dominance by whatever means necessary, to mobilize the state in order to put those pesky special-interest “identity groups” in their place. This is America, after all!
Read 9 tweets
Mar 15
Why does the “cancel culture” idea play such an outsized role in liberal / mainstream media coverage?

We need to look at both ideological and structural factors: a confluence of reactionary centrism and a system that incentivizes #BothSides “balance” above all else.
Reactionary centrism is the ideology that animates many of the people who shape media coverage. A disproportionate percentage of those people are white men, and the fact that elite white men face a little more scrutiny today than in the past has caused quite a bit of anxiety.
#metoo is another excellent example of this dynamic: As soon as traditionally marginalized groups gain enough power and enough of a platform to make their demands for respect and accountability heard, certain white people (predominantly men) start bemoaning “persecution.”
Read 16 tweets
Mar 14
Just Trump being ridiculous, nothing to see here?

Actually, it’s the standard-bearer of the Right, the political leader of the Republican Party, the likely 2024 GOP presidential candidate, calling for a violent struggle to the death against the enemy within.

It’s alarming.
An enemy, by the way, that is supposedly everywhere, dominates all the powerful institutions of American life - very much including the Democratic Party, which is therefore not just a political opponent, but a fundamentally illegitimate, “Un-American” faction.
The leader of the Republican Party has abandoned - and is actively assaulting - the foundations of democratic political culture. Accepting the legitimacy of the political opponent and denouncing the use of political violence: Trump is delighting in crossing those lines.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 11
In last week’s column for @GuardianUS, I wrote about how the Right is infatuated with foreign autocrats like Putin who they perceive as defenders of “Christian values.”

I’d like to address a few reactions to the piece - and some misconceptions about white Christian nationalism:
There are four common reactions / misconceptions I’d like to address:

- “These are just fringe voices”

- “Putin is not a real Christian”

- “If they love Putin so much, why don’t they go live in Russia?”

- “How can they possibly go from hating Communism to loving Putin?”
1) ”Just the fringe”

Like I said in my column, to describe Donald Trump, the Right’s political leader, and Tucker Carlson, one of its key media activists, as “fringe” is either wishful thinking and / or deliberately disingenuous.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(