Building a new thread on this, Ukraine and the long-war and why a peace deal, even a very messy one, would be the best solution even if it gives Putin an off ramp (in other words, be careful before you push for maximalist Ukrainian demands)
As someone who has been very critical of Russian military performance and complimentary of the way the Ukrainians have defended themselves, I do think we need to be careful arguing that Ukraine can somehow easily take on a long war or make extreme demands in a peace treaty.
If a long war will tax Russia tremendously (first thread) it is not easy for Ukraine. The fighting is on Ukrainian soil and the civilians being brutalized are Ukrainian. The fact also remains that Ukraine cannot conquer Russia, so whatever happens, there will have to be a deal.
Certainly if Putin falls, that would be best for reaching a deal--but it would be very rash to base your negotiating strategy on that possibility. Getting rid of dictators is not easy, precisely because they tend to be paranoid, bloodthirsty bastards who protect themselves
So if Ukraine, as it seems to be doing, can cripple the first Russian invasion, that would present an opportunity for a negotiated deal, and those who talk about Ukraine keeping fighting should understand that.
In a thread from a few weeks ago I supported the following deal that did not please everyone, but still I think would be a way forward.
1) Ukraine forgoes NATO membership but the door is opened to EU membership. This provides some important security guarantees going forward, not as much as NATO, but lets see what the EU becomes and Russia will take ages to recover from this
2) A ceasefire and Russian withdrawal to the invasion jump off points. Yes that means that Russian forces stay in Crimea and Donetsk/Luhansk for now.
3) Internationally run plebiscites in Donetsk/Luhansk and Crimea to establish their political allegiance. This will be controversial for many--but is there a better way to handle this that doesnt involve a long, bloody war.
4) Reparations to be paid to Ukraine through a percentage of Russian oil/gas sales being diverted to a Ukrainian rebuilding fund.
Most of these points have actually been trialled by the Ukrainian government at some point--so hopefully people dont jump down my throat for trying to come up with a plan they would never want.
This seems to me to be a way out of this horrible, bloody war. I would take it if it were on the table.
Its worth noting that about equal numbers of people are saying that the Ukrainians would not agree to this or that the Russians would not agree. In that way, maybe it is a middle ground
adding this here. A very well reasoned analysis by @LawDavF outlining the real strengths that Ukraine would have in any peace negotiations and the dilemma that Putin's personal position has placed him in. Worth a read. samf.substack.com/p/losing-wars-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Mar 26
1) Ukraine Strategy Thread--day 2. How we can tell it was pre-planned and thought out. Some people have asked how we know that Ukraine had such a thought out strategic plan. We cant be 100% sure, but there is pretty good evidence that they did. And we should start with airfields.
2) At the very start of the campaign the Russians undertook a military operation as if they were in a Sylvester Stallone film. In broad daylight they choppered in some of their best troops to seize Hostomel airfield, just outside Kyiv. nytimes.com/2022/02/24/wor…
3) If this attack had succeeded, it would have been hugely advantageous to the Russians. Given them a forward staging post on Kyiv's doorstep. And had the Ukrainians not prepared well, it might have succeeded.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 25
1. A thread (speculative) on what is the most important/least discussed strategic concept of the invasion so far: Ukrainian strategy. What the Ukrainians have done seems systematic, well-planned and very effective. This is an attempt to systematize it as a non Ukrainian.
2. One of the real problems so far is that the pre and post-invasion analysis has been dominated by Russian strategy people, who never bothered to look much at the Ukrainians as a serious force, which is why they expected, w/o evidence, that the Ukrainians would collapse quickly
3. What the Ukrainians have done is seemingly put in place a plan of action that has stymied a much larger war machine and inflicted the kinds of losses on the invaders that is rendering them ineffective. Here is what their plan might be.
Read 18 tweets
Mar 25
If true, this is an extraordinary rate of failure.
Here is another link. Really extreme failure fate.
Indeed, if true we should stop calling them precision guided munitions, and just call them malfunctioning projectiles
Read 5 tweets
Mar 23
Thanks for this. I’m getting lots of comments from people saying it’s no good criticising the Russian military in hindsight. I agree. Though if I can say, I wrote a piece a month before the invasion saying Russia was too weak and would struggle with complex operations
And that Ukraine would fight. Article was in @TheCriticMag . Here is a screenshot of what I was arguing. Image
Here’s a link to the whole article. thecritic.co.uk/the-new-appeas…
Read 8 tweets
Mar 23
@JackDetsch producing a number of really interesting tweets from the US DoD briefing about what the Russians are trying to do. Seems like a little of everything; reorganise to take Kyiv, make a flanking manoeuvre to take Odessa and surround Ukrainian forces in the Donbas.
Cannot see how they would have the force for all of this, unless Ukrainian forces are far weaker than they seem to be. Wonder if Moscow is just barking out orders that the Russian Army can’t fulfill?
Again, if this is true, instead of massing to attack Kyiv, Russian forces seem to be in a bit of a mess to both the east and west of the city.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 23
A very quick thread on those talking about Russia settling in for a long war and mobilising it’s resources for an extended campaign. Could they do it: possibly, but it would be a very different war with major societal implications.
The Russian Army is actually not that large. It’s around 900,000, which sounds big (though for a country of Russia’s size it’s very thinly spread) but about a third is conscript and many of the ‘professionals’ are on 12 month contracts. csis.org/blogs/post-sov…
We have pretty good intelligence that the Russians have deployed 75% of their best fighting formations to Ukraine (these are the ones wasting away now). Maybe they send the other 25%, but even that won’t make much of a difference in the short term.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(