Jeremy Gordon Profile picture
Mar 31 14 tweets 3 min read
This story is going round, but I think it is unlikely that Russian soldiers developed Acute Radiation Syndrome while messing around in the #Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. I'll explain my thinking in a short 🧵
Acute Radiation Syndrome is a very rare thing caused by a super-intense dose of radiation to the whole body.

It happened to some plant operators and firefighters during the #Chernobyl accident in 1986, but I'm doubtful it happened to Russian troops in 2022 for three reasons:
1. The most intense radiation comes from nuclear material with a short half-life – decaying fast and giving off all its radiation in a hurry. We're talking seconds, minutes and hours. More than 35 years after the accident, that stuff is gone.
To my knowledge people who developed Acute Radiation Syndrome from a nuclear accident have been the ones on the spot, even in the room, when it took place. Not people in the general area and not decades later.
2. Radiation sources literally signal their presence and so are easy to find. It is unlikely that a hotspot presenting this level of danger would not have been identified and cleared up.
3. Even if there was a very intense radiation source still lying around it would likely only affect the troops who uncovered it, handled it or sat next to it. Probably not seven bus loads of them.
None of this is to say that messing around in the Exclusion Zone is safe. The soil there is contaminated and digging trenches to sit in it would be dumb (why do that anyway, given nobody is around for miles?)
If troops burnt wood from the forest, that would be a bad idea. They would inhale contamination in the smoke. Eating wild food from the forest would also be a bad idea. However...
Exposures like these, especially internally from ingestion and inhalation, would raise their statistical chance of developing cancer, but it would not deliver the huge whole-body-at-once dose you need for Acute Radiation Syndrome. It also wouldn't make them feel physically sick.
In conclusion, have Russian troops done dumb stuff near Chernobyl? Well, messing with anything would be dumb.
Have they done themselves harm? Potentially there will be impacts in the future.
Seven busloads of Acture Radiation Syndrome patients? Personally, I don't expect so.
That's my reaction based on limited information. I'll update if decent info becomes available.

But to be honest, I doubt it will. The source is a Ukrainian official and the Russian troops are now said to be in Belarus. I don't expect we'll hear anything definite.
In the meantime, perhaps we should ask ourselves what Russian troops might say or do to get out of Ukraine? Or what Ukrainians might say to get Russians to go home voluntarily?
Very good points made here:
- the source for the idea that Russian soldiers were sick from radiation is a single Facebook post
- There are other reasons Russian forces might visit the medical radiation facility besides actual sickness

I've supplemented this with some information on where this story came from and the lack of any real evidence to support the idea that anyone is sick.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremy Gordon

Jeremy Gordon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jrmygrdn

Mar 31
Some collected thoughts on what's going on with Russian troops in the #Chernobyl Exclusion Zone and whether they have gotten themselves sick 🧵

(Spoiler: No)
Earlier today the idea that Russian troops around #Chernobyl had developed Acute Radiation Sickness was going viral. I did this thread to explain why that struck me as highly unlikely.
Now, looking into the story more, I find there's no real substance to it. Here's why:
Read 11 tweets
Mar 31
There have been a lot of questions about nuclear issues in Ukraine since the war began. Here's a thread of my explanations if anyone wants to catch up.

[These are offered as what I put out at the time. I don't promise they are 100% complete or up to date.]
3 March
A run-down of nuclear power plant construction and essential safety systems in the context of troops approaching Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant
3 March
In response to worries about the vulnerability of used nuclear fuel, some general info – what is it, how is it stored?
Read 12 tweets
Mar 18
China's Hongyanhe nuclear power plant is to heat 20,000 people's homes in a project that will begin by cut coal use by over 12,000 tonnes.

Here is a little 🧵 on this growing trend cutting China's coal pollution, saving lives and $$$ billions.
world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Distr…
Hongyanhe is a big nuclear power plant in northwestern China. It has five reactors that have been built since 2009, while the sixth will start up in the next few months.
Connecting it to the regional district heating system will take warmth from the reactors to Hongyanhe Town, Wafangdian City and Dalian City. Work on the connection will start in June, in time to heat the towns next winter. Dalian looks pretty cool.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 15
UK opposition party Labour is just as solidly behind nuclear to cut fossil fuels as the Conservatives in power. No timidity from either party in saying the word any more. ImageImage
In fairness both have long been pro-nuclear. Conservatives naturally so, while Labour actually launched the original UK nuclear R&D push and its first power plants back in the day. Labour did go a bit soft on it under Jeremy Corbyn, however, and shied away from saying the word.
Here's current Labour leader Keir Starmer actually mentioning nuclear first.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 6
There are reports that #Kharkiv Institute of Physics in #Ukraine has been hit by rockets. It contains a small #nuclear research facility. I'll tell you what I understand about it and what's going on in this thread:
#Kharkiv has a 'sub-critical assembly'. That means that by design it does not have an ongoing chain reaction. Reactions only occur when triggered by an external source. This whole setup has been switched off since the invasion began.
At #Kharkiv scientists need to use a small particle accelerator to activate the subcritical assembly. It's not something that can happen by accident. We can be sure it will stay fully shut down.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 5
There was an update this morning on #Zaporizhzhia and other nuclear power plants in #Ukraine from the plant owner, Energoatom.

Importantly, the situation is calm and nuclear operation is normal.

Details below:
Energoatom said that as of 9.30am its nuclear plants were all stably generating power for Ukraine. That includes #Zaporizhzhia. It notes that the country's power needs are being met.
At #Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Energoatom said "the perimeter... is now under the control of the Russian invaders [and the situation] is being monitored on an ongoing basis."
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(