The newsflow on Russian gas payments in past days remains confusing. My current interpretation of the situation and the status quo of the market...

1/n #TTF
On 23 March the Kremlin requested EU gas deliveries to be denominated in rubel. Putin said: “If these payments are not made [in rubel], we will consider it a failure of the buyer to fulfil its obligations, with all the ensuing consequences.”

2/n
abcnews.go.com/International/…
Russia delivers 35% of EU gas of which 60% is paid for in € & rest in US$. Such are the contractual obligations. Therefore, all G-7 ministers agreed on Monday 28th that such a request would be "a one-sided & clear breach of the existing contracts.”

3/n
ft.com/content/158ae4…
VVP only knows escalation. Does the EU have to prepare for a loss of Russian gas if Putin insists on his request? I don't know but the German economic ministers introduced a 3-step emergency plan & addressed consumers to self-ration their gas use.

4/n
@Bundeskanzler Scholz then summarised his conversation with VVP as follows: “We looked at the contracts which request payments to be made in euros, sometimes in dollars. I made it clear in the conversation with the Russian president that it will remain this way."

5/n
Today (31 March), VVP signed a Kremlin decree for gas payments to be paid in rubel starting from April 1 (i.e. tomorrow). For that, it seems that clients must open a Gazprombank (GPB) account but can still pay in € or US$ while GPB will change it in rubel. VVP then said..

6/n
So what is this all about? In practical terms, it seems to makes little difference: Either EU companies buy directly in €, in which case Russia insists exporters convert 80% of revenues in rubles, or the money is converted first, most probably involving its central bank..

7/n
VVP gave the Russian CB, the customs authorities & the government 10 days to implement the new system. Either way, it seems that the EU is "safe" paying in euros for 1 month as payments for April deliveries are not due until May in case their is a "misunderstanding". Also...

8/n
Could Gazprom sell its 150bcm pa EU gas to China? Big volumes need big pipelines. There are no such connections b/w West Siberian fields (where Gazprom pumps gas for EU) and China. Completing a 50bcm pa pipe through Mongolia to China would take 5+ years & $10bn+..!?

9/n
Meanwhile, the EU managed - thx to mild weather, record LNG imports & some rationing - to get storage levels back into 6-year averages - although they remain low (below in %-fill)...but the right trend.

10/n
So why is TTF at €122/MWh ($39/MMBtu; $240/boe)? IMHO, D/S is too uncertain to allow for "cost-curve" pricing. Instead TTF needs to keep arb open to attract non-contracted LNG barrel away from Asia & into EU. Asian JKM prices at $35.7/MMBtu.

11/11 Thx!
VVP explaining Gazprombank involvement for new transactions - i.e. a way to circumvent sanctions of the Russian central bank - as explained above - without having to renegotiate contact terms. Latter would allow EU clients to reduce (duration) purchase obligations.

12/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander Stahel 🇺🇦

Alexander Stahel 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BurggrabenH

Mar 18
It is called transition - not switch!

The oil market in 6 Tweets - rest is noise (I know, I like the rest too but it won’t matter for coming months).

1/n

#OOTT
Oil is an extractive industry. The industry needs to replace ONE North Sea each year (3mbpd) just to stay still (more in future due to base declines). That needs $600bn. Industry didn’t and does not invest it. Meanwhile demand is back at pre-Covid levels.

2/n
The world may draw another 2mbpd of liquids out of storage in 2022 (massive!) due to variety of factors - Russian sanction being a big one! And no, sanctions will not go away with a peace agreement. “West” will request check & balances after nuclear threads post VVP.

3/n
Read 6 tweets
Mar 14
I recommend reading the full “deal” to reopen Nickel trade at LME on Wednesday, 16 March.

I mean are u kidding me: $3.5bn trades canceled! The guy still short 150,000 tonnes! Refused to “be closed out”!? JPM agreeing not to increase margins etc…!

1/5 #Nickel
2/5
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Feb 2
Make, buy or buyback….?

In any extractive industry this is a revolving question for shareholder, boards & managers once stable cash flows & a strong balance sheet have been established.

🧵

1/n
Make (develop) has significant potential to create value (something out of nothing) but comes with significant delay between cash-outflows & returns (15+y) & at risk of total capital loss. Which is why the market does not reward it.

2/…
Take MMG & the Las Bambas project in #Peru. The market gave zero credit to MMG’s share price until the mine produced #copper. But it is true for the entire mining or resource SECTOR.

3/n
Read 7 tweets
Jan 27
$SQZ is rock solid: 58mboe 2P Res from 5 fields with soild maturity mix (Columbus); comes off milestone payments for BKR acqu.; N&S Egg growth pipe; UK lowest E&P tax rate ex US; access to services; conventional fields; top mgmt; zero EV in 2022?
GB 500p intrinsic value.

1/3 Image
Check out its potential cash flow profile (without growth capex for North & Egg) or potential well interventions for BKR in 2022 for, perhaps, $80m. FCF would be $537m. Deduct $50-80m and it may still be zero EV by year-end due to gas price futures curve. Insane!

2/3 Image
Here is the NBP gas price Future curve as of today. We modelled Serica below that to leave room for their 20% hedging which could be below that.

$SQZ is also a hedge against potential Ukraine disruption. Better than $IOG as proven fields;

3/3 Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
EU gas: Right now & hear, #Gazprom uses gas export as political weapon. It books but does not use; bookings became useless indicator of what might flow in pipes. Latest: even NS flows reduce.

So far, EU compensated with warmer weather & LNG, as illustrated below.

1/4
Last month, Gazprom booked 21% of Mallnow’s (GER entry from PL) capacity for Jan, yet there have been no flows. In Dec, the company used daily pipe allocations for that route after opting against booking capacity for the whole month. Nor do Flows enter Poland (from BL).

2/4
On the Ukrainian route, some capacity was booked on Monday for gas shipments to Slovakia via Velke Kapusany border point for Feb. Yet, current flows through that station, even though an extra booking was also made for this month, are a fraction of contractual volumes. 

3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jan 13
Macro shorts commodities on 1bps of inflation deceleration. Mind u though: demand is half the story nor the real story!

Years of underinvestment should make shorting oil, EU/A gas or metals risky business this time & in absence of a deep recession due to Fed mistake.

Thread
Nickel - the battery metal - first. If you short Nickel, you deserve to lose all your capital. Reason: ignorance!

Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(