A Delhi Court will hear response of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to the plea of former Amnesty International, India chair Aakar Patel, who seeks suspension of a Look Out of Circular of CBI and permission to travel to the US.
Mir: Now for IO to say that we opened an "LOC to thwart any attempt"... If in the estimation of agency there is a propensity on behalf of accused there are remedies under CrPC.
Mir: What matters is what you do – fair, reasonable and procedurally sustainable. Question will arise once he files a chargesheet and doesn't ask the accused to appear, means that he is not concerned with me.
Mir: please ask him (IO), in his case diary, from filing of FIR till date, has he got any substantial evidence which necessitated him to him to say loc must be opened?
Mir: Your honor the fundamental rights which are guaranteed under Article 19 and 21 are not to be trampled down, railroaded with a sense of impunity.
An appropriate case to send a suitable reply to the IO but society at large
CBI officer addresses court: SP writes to IB (for LoC) after talking approval of competent authority. 31st December we sent request (SP) to MHA for opening LOC.
CBI officer: Chargesheet was filed without arrest. In anticipation that he being an influential person and him fleeing from justice, we moved this application.
Court: had he been a flight risk, he would have been arrested? He could have run away ... If he is a flight risk, he was a flight risk during investigation ... You could have taken surety.
Mir: pre-formatted performa basis doesn't work. The pre formatted passport no, photo, etc, what is the worthy material with IO that Aakar Patel falls in an exceptional case?
Mir: MHA can't be saddled with the responsibility. You were the investigating authority ... How departure of Aakar Patel – being invited by Michigan University, Berkeley University – be detrimental to integrity, sovereignty of the country?
Mir: Today they have burdened the court with chargesheet. Dates will be given. This is like putting the cart before the horse ... How your honour they breach the CBI manual and ethics of investigation?
Mir: Why not these 4 officers be called upon to take consequences and terms? ... There are many institutions – Delhi Police widow find, Mediation center. though it is a loss to me. I should be compensated.
BREAKING: Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to file a compliance report before ACMM court with respect to yesterday's order on the look out circular in the #AakarPatel FCRA case.
Mir informs Judge Dharmender Singh who is hearing Aakar Patel's contempt plea about the order of Special CBI Court which stayed the direction of written apology from CBI director and asked him not to leave country without its permission.
A Special CBI Court to shortly start hearing the revision plea of the CBI against the order of a Magistrate asking the agency to withdraw its look out circular against Aakar Patel in a FCRA case.
#SupremeCourt hears an application which objects to the road widening project for the #CharDham yatra.
Adv: whenever there is a diversion of forest land for a non forest purpose, the ecological cost has to be looked into and inspection needs to be minute.
Justice Aniruddha Bose: If you are on mitigation factors then its compensation related
Justice DY Chandrachud: let it come before the expert committee
Advocate: they say they will cut 8,000 trees but says this forest will come in another crown area
DYC J: The committee which NGT has constituted has different body entities like Wildlife warden, conservator for forests etc.
#SupremeCourt to shortly consider an application dealing with judicial officers handling cases against legislators who would be promoted and transferred & would thus need appointment of fresh officers @AshwiniUpadhyay
The application also prays for the permission to Gauhati HC to designate one court of session and one court of JMFC in the district of Kamrup to handle cases against MPs and MLAs #SupremeCourt
Amicus Curiae Senior Advocate Vijay Hansaria: I have filed a 16th report. It needs to be taken up. There is urgency. for 5 years 2000 cases are pending despite SC orders
#SupremeCourt is hearing plea seeking removal of GST and income tax on the Haj services provided to Hajis of India in Saudi Arabia. The bouquet of services include Air tickets, currency exchange, etc
Adv for petitioner: this is a crucial issue about where the service is consumed. The law says that tax will be levied where the consumer is located and we challenge this aspect #hajtax
Justice AM Khanwilkar: Consumption theory that you are trying to tell us for a air company not from India, flying from India, then only the proportion of tax will be for the ratio traveled in India. Is it?
Adv: Counsel: airline analogy the services starts from India.