🧵A rough timeline of Gaslighting on Children and Schools
April 2020 - April 2022
Triggered by this exchange between Deepti and Shamez
UK policy, SAGE,JCVI etc had generally relied on their own studies and data, international work rarely referenced in meeting minutes
2/ Initially some gov advisors claimed shutting schools could be detrimental as schools helped build up herd immunity
Then Lockdown came and the narrative became children less likely to be infected, less likely to transmit when infected
3/ This comes from a study by Russel Viner, then President of @RCPCHtweets
He selected studies, many not on covid and concluded children would have little impact on transmission, partially because of the thinking most ppl would get infected anyway
4/ This led to unknown members of SAGE inviting Viner to be the expert advisor on covid transmission and children, he would also go on to be a source of evidence for the JCVI
The review claiming children unlikely to transmit still appeared in LAs Green Book in 2021
5/ PHE commissioned UEA to look at the effectiveness of different lockdown measures, conclusion, school closures and cancelling mass gatherings had the greatest impact on reducing R, gov chose to never quote this study, it was effectively binned itv.com/news/anglia/20…
6/ PHE then did a study on transmission, whilst most students weren't in school and concluded transmission isnt an issue in schools
Media and others assumed this means children arent as infectious, not that smaller class sizes cuts chains of transmission
11/ ONS was found to have breached guidelines with the way it represented data on risk to education staff, minimising the risk, statistics regulator reprimanded ONS who are normally pretty good
12/ Jan 2021 after schools were eventually included in lockdown Hancock and Johnson saying schools were vectors of transmission
Halfon had a cosy Ed committee with a one sided selection of experts concluding transmission isn't an issue
13/ A caller to BBC5live said they had a large number of children on their ward
RCPCH said this was unverified misinformation and pushed to have the clip taken down, months later the data shows there was a rise in hospitalisations
14/ March 2021 new PHE study finds transmission isn't an issue in schools
Method was to go in and do a sera study on students in on that day, children isolating eg confirmed cases and contacts were therefor not included
15/ Gov advisor Dingwall and Woolhouse claim cases have never risen with schools return
Both also claim we never needed to locksdown
16/ Ladhani, look no rose, see what happened next
Absoud, masks not needed due to cross protection from adults
Petersen, schools shouldn't tell communities about outbreaks
17/ Remember in mid 2021 when we were told vaccines had fixed everything, when asking about vaccine status of cases was private medical information
Complaints made to employers just for asking
18/ To get rid of contact tracing PHE decided to run trials where it was replaced with testing
Students and parents weren't asked for consent but apparently not doing this tests was unethical
20/ Debate on schools has been filled with gaslighting and accusations, questioning official line is "pile ons" then calls for grown up debate, followed by the snide comments
31/ Ladhani, if JCVI don't want to vax healthy kids, it could be worse for unhealthy kiss
Retweets LJ who has an antivax podcast her tweet, UfT and T4R are disinfo groups
Children naturally resistant to novel viruses
32/ Forget GBD, it's Independent SAGE who are the dangerous lobbyists
Never complained about GBD
Home imprisonment, however he has been supporting UsForThem, mentioned in the #HARTleaks
33/ Those urging caution had too much airtime, just look how much access and influence they've had with politicians
None
34/ Yeah it's Independent SAGE who should be the subject of in inquiry
No mention of the GBD and their meetings with governments?
Hmmm
35/ Independent SAGE had a child speak for a few minutes about their long covid, trolls piled onto, paediatricians decided to attack Independent SAGE for their "political agenda"
Yet they keep complaining children's voices aren't being heard🤷♂️
36/ UK Paediatrics claimed Delta was actually milder, claimed American Paediatric association were being misleading and attacked professionals in the states
37/ That in 2021 they were still trying to claim infections were occuring in school is staggering
38/ Ladhani describing vax as "novel technology" but don't dare accuse him of using anti vax tropes
Munro allow younger children to get infected
Ladhani, so many kids infected is there a point in vaccinating?
39/ JCVI decide not to vax, minutes from meetings, guess who were advising
44/ And the latest, that made me decide to put this together
Remember it would be unreasonable apparently to read this as suggesting hospitalisations were mild
End🧵For now...
Short bonus, start of 2020 @RCPCHtweets wrote about the importance of improving air quality in classrooms, impacts of pollution etc were clear, called for action
Pandemic hit, where have the calls for improved ventilation gone?
🧵Even the language the government is using is straight out of the GBD play book, well they've got everything they wanted now, when we see the full consequences remember who is responsible
2/ We have an attempt to declare that lockdowns and all measures don't work, this is about absolving the pro infection crowd of all responsibility
"This was inevitable, nothing could have stopped these deaths and damage to health"
Herd immunity? Or is it that some areas have already started Easter holidays and lots of schools have gone to partial closures due to lack of staff? #edutwitter
Yesterday we had "more children back in school" claiming there was less covid absence, only problem with that is that absence increased, just illness logged as covid went down, due to sick kids being off but not tested
As you can see in this joint letter from the school leaders unions
2021 they promised data not dates, then ignored the data on Delta and removed measures
This is what they do, they give false assurances to get what they want and then renage on them straight away
We see it on funding, on taxes, on organisational changes to institutions
The "we have anti virals now so no need for any measures" was GBD sophistry, production is limited and will take a while to scale up so making policy decisions that considerably increase demand of a bottlenecked supply wasnt going to work well
This is getting a lot of media attention, being help up as the harms of lockdown, many using this to argue measures should never have been introduced and lockdowns were a mistake