PSA: You *CANNOT* use a "bougie" or Eschmann Intubating Stylet to do an endotracheal tube exchange. I have seen this mistake twice in the past 6 months. You will lose the airway. A simple look at the length of the bougie and an #ETT will make this clear.
The length of an adult ETT is about 32 cm and the length of the #eschmannstylete is 70 cm. This leaves no room in the center for you to grab it. When you retract the #ETT to the end of the stylet, its distal tip is still in the patient's mouth & entire stylet is covered
To do a tube exchange, you need 2x the length of the ETT and then some additional length to work with, else you risk retracting the exchange device too far and losing the airway. This is why they make an "airway exchange catheter" and its length is 83cm: cookmedical.com/products/cc_ca…
This seems counterintuitive: if you can put the tube in with the intubating stylet, why can't you take it out and replace it? This is because when you intubate with the Eschmann, you don't need control of the stylet on both ends (like a CVC guidewire)
When inserting the ETT you just hold the distal end of the stylet and push the tube forward over it, and any error will push the stylet further into the airway. Like in this video from #EMCrit:
When you reverse the process, and withdraw a tube over the bougie, you risk dragging the bougie out of the airway, so you need control of it at all times. As the diagram makes clear, when the tube clears the proximal end of the bougie, you have to hold the center of it
But the center of it is down at or in the patient's mouth. If you retract the bougie to be able to grab it in the center, the bougie is dangerously close to exiting the glottis and in my experience *WILL* exit the glottis
This is why it's called the Eschmann *INTUBATING* stylet, and why Cook makes a specific *Airway Exchange Catheter* which is 13cm longer. It also goes without saying that you should never do this blindly and always visualize the airway with VL during the process.
If you don't have an airway exchange catheter, the safest thing is to just extubate and reintubate the patient under direct or video visualization, after making careful note of the original intubation record and any difficulties encountered.
Finally, remember: a patient with a cuff leak has an airway. A compromised one perhaps, but it's an airway. If you bungle the tube exchange, they will have the biggest leak you have ever seen: the one that arises from the tube being positioned out of the airway.
Look at 28cm mark. total length may be closer to 30 cm without the connector interface, but the points still stand
It has been pointed out that this can be done, by cutting the ETT, lubing the bougie, and in this video, operating down in the mouth (unknown lengths) - I maintain that it is dicey, and if you don't know exactly what you're doing, avoid it.
Note also in the above video that all that room that he needs to operate in the mouth to grab the tube "down there" precludes #laryngoscopy during the exchange, forcing him to "go blind". I don't like it one bit. Too little room for error.
"CANNOT" is too strong a word. You can, but with high inherent danger, so you shouldn't, says me.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Phlegmfighter

The Phlegmfighter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @phlegmfighter

Dec 15, 2021
Write this down: “The purpose of daily rounds & presentation (& progress note) is to *document the behavior of the disease under observation and treatment*.” This is the paramount philosophical purpose. You can include superfluous and redundant boilerplate (eg RRR no MGR no CCE)
But your presentation MUST contain all the data from the patient/exam/labs etc which allow an assessment (explicit or intuitive) of whether the patient is getting better or worse or not progressing, whether the expected is happening or not, & whether there r unexpected findings
Ideally, these rspecific to the pt & the disease rather than routine claptrap; if your patient has #complicatedPPE, the output of the chest tube will have a central position in the presentation; if it’s asthma, wheezing, RR, acc mm use. Tailor ur assessment to the disease….
Read 5 tweets
Dec 14, 2021
This 30ish woman of mean height has a recurrent right spontaneous #PTX 18 months after the first. She has a history of thoracic pain receiving spinal steroid injections; o/w healthy. The best way to get the #diagnosis is (poll next) Image
The best way to get the diagnosis is:
Read 12 tweets
Dec 13, 2021
Do you know all of these nuances of #pleuraldisease? Why is an #empyema distinct from a complicated #parapneumoniceffusion? What is #contarinisyndrome #explosivepleuritis #chyliform #pseudochylous? Are all #chylothorax milky? #pccm #pulmcrit #pulmonary
#pleuraldisease is fascinating and nuanced. First step is #lightscriteria which give favor to finding #exudates which tend to be more urgent. You only need one criterion, which maximizes #sensitivity. Meaningless statement: "It's an exudate only by protein." One criterion=exudate
(Like on Tinder, the more criteria you require, the more you narrow your pool, compromising sensitivity for specificity.) Transudates I will skip over. Most common #exudate is #parapneumoniceffusion #PPE. If there is or is likely to be #pneumonia, it's PPE. Next task is to...
Read 26 tweets
Mar 7, 2021
“Research finds that the best people at making predictions (did you know that there are prediction tournaments?) aren’t those who are smartest but rather those who weigh evidence dispassionately and are willing to change their minds.” #cromwellsrule nytimes.com/2021/03/03/opi…
“Likewise, math whizzes excel at interpreting data — but only so long as the topic is banal, like skin rashes. A study found that when the topic was a hot one they cared about, like gun policy, they blundered. Passion swamped expertise.”
“There are a number of biases in play, including the “I’m not biased” bias. That’s when we believe we’re more objective than others, and it particularly traps intelligent people.”
Read 4 tweets
Sep 7, 2020
Floating the big yellow bird today. (#swanganz #SCG #PAC). Always remember to “lift it, flick it, flush it” and watch the results on the monitor before you set it a sail to make sure you’re on the right channel and you’re scale is correct. #zentensivist @doc_BLocke
Irony is I get flask for not doing bronchs where I rarely find anything and I get flak for doing Swans where, as in this case, I often find useful things
To elaborate on “lift it flick it flush it” just in case it’s not obvious: b/f you float the swan, check it’s response on the monitor: lift it (the tip) 10 cm & see if baseline rises accordingly on the monitor; flick the tip to see if you get deflections; then flush it to see if
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(