Hey #immigrationtwitter, quick question live from USCIS Lawrence: what is a "reasonable period of time"? 5 mins? 25? We're going on 30 
Interviewer has refused to interview my client on the actual subject of the interview we are here for, relying on absurdly bad prior findings without giving us a chance to (1) see the report they were based on or (2) offer any testimony to address USCIS's hearsay summary of them
Interviewer is also using entirely the wrong legal standard, shifting the burden to someone who has nothing to do with the allegations--but that hardly even seems like the point anymore after watching my clients being treated the way they just were
(tbc no surprises here other than the legal and professional errors, we knew exactly what was in here--other than the actual "evidence" we have been denied any chance to see--and came in ready to talk about it. If only we could have!)
The government has a significant burden of proof in any case like this, but extra in one that denies the chance for a mother to remain here with young US citizen children and a USC spouse *forever.* We should get as much time as we need in the room for a decision that important
40 minutes
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
