I was recently invited to debate with a representative of @bp_plc about what the net-zero target means for UK energy policy.

Here's a🧵based on my slides about why the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's letter is scientifically illiterate 1/n
First things first. I was asked to participate in this debate, as I'd been arrested taking part in this protest with @ScientistsX at @beisgovuk. Our demand was simple & science led, that the UK end all NEW oil and gas exploration.

Read more here: 2/n
theguardian.com/environment/20…
As @antonioguterres, the @UN Secretary General, made plain at the launch of the @IPCC_CH WG1 report we are now at #CodeRed for humanity.

This is (as the UK parliament declared) a #ClimateEmergency 3/n
The @IPCC_CH reports tell us we have a 'rapidly closing window to secure a livable and sustainable future for all!' 4/n
Government's have known about this worsening crisis for over 30yrs BUT concentrations of GHGs in our atmosphere keep rising - as do emissions!

Governments have repeatedly failed to act on the scientific warnings 5/n

H/T @MuellerTadzio @wiebkemarie @MariusHasenheit @sustentioEU
@MuellerTadzio @wiebkemarie @MariusHasenheit @sustentioEU After years of continued delay we have squandered our carbon budgets. This rewrites the chronology of climate change from long-term gradual reduction to urgent & radical emissions cuts!

6/n H/T @robbie_andrew
So, demanding has it become to still meet our internationally agreed climate targets that most models now assume huge amounts of carbon dioxide removal as well as rapid reductions in fossil fuel use will have to occur.

7/n H/T @Peters_Glen

But most experts in this topic, such as @KevinClimate & @Peters_Glen, warn that this is a risky gamble as it is very possible that these negative emissions technologies will NOT work at scale.

You can read more here:
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… 7/n
Whichever way you look at it then it is "Now or never" if we are to meet the 1.5C climate target.

As Prof. Jim Skea, Co-Chair of @IPCC_CH WG3 explains we need "deep emissions reductions across all sectors". Starting NOW!

theguardian.com/environment/20… 8/n
What's this mean for the fossil fuel industry? Even, when allowing for billions of tonnes of CDR, we need to leave most of our reserves in the ground!

A team from @UCL showed that to reach the 1.5C carbon budget 60% of gas & oil must not be burnt!

nature.com/articles/s4158… 9/n
This is not at all scientifically controversial.

In a report commissioned by @AlokSharma_RDG ahead of #COP26 - @fbirol, Executive Director of the @IEA, said there "can be no new investment in oil, gas and coal"!

theguardian.com/environment/20… 10/n
@AlokSharma_RDG @fbirol @IEA The @UNEP Production Gap report (also published ahead of #COP26), tell us the exact same thing.

You can find that report here:
productiongap.org/2021report/

11/n
"World governments plan to produce more than twice the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting warming to 1.5C"

12/n
The conclusion is clear. It is governments (formed of politicians like @KwasiKwarteng) approving new fossil fuel developments who are the "dangerous radicals".

"Investing in new fossil fuels infrastructure is moral and economic madness" !!! 13/n

None of the major oil companies examined by @PriceofOil come anywhere close to aligning their business plans with our climate targets.

They are not to be trusted. 14/n
@PriceofOil In fact new research by @Global_Witness & @RystadEnergy found that the 20 largest oil and gas companies look set to invest almost $1,000,000,000,000 (a trillion 💲!) in developing NEW oil and gas over the next decade! 🤯

Ecocidal, but still legal!!!

globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/f… 15/n
Investments like this new project by @bp_plc in the Murlach field, North Sea, which has the backing of
@GOVUK😭 16/n

If you're interested, these are the banks financing such projects in case you want to #MoveYourMoney

Remember: It's not an investment if it is destroying the planet! 17/n

Oil and gas companies (and apparently government ministers also) are resorting to endless #Greenwash to try and carry on with business-as-usual in the face of huge public demand for #ClimateAction.

This paper in @PLOSONE unpacks how this works.

journals.plos.org/plosone/articl… 18/n
The #Greenwash comprises of a whole arsenal of weaponised discourses used to try to delay #ClimateAction that we need to look out for. You'll see it in the media everywhere!

Helpfully @lamb_wf et al mapped these for us in this paper...
cambridge.org/core/journals/… 19/n
When you're ready to move on from despair at the naked power & corruption, remember (as former IPCC co-chair Prof. Robert Watson, reminds us "we have the technologies we need to transition from fossil fuels today" - we just need governments to act!

20/n
theconversation.com/climate-scient…
But as the great environmental activist @billmckibben reminds us creating political will requires building political movements.

This is not about data and science this is about power!

And we need powerful movements - which means we need YOU to step up! 21/n
So find a group you want to join whether @Fridays4future, @350 @ExtinctionR @sunrisemvmt @ende_gelande or any of the hundreds of other climate action groups & sign up your friends and family.

We're going to have to fight for the rest of our lives just to have a future!

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Aaron Thierry

Dr. Aaron Thierry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThierryAaron

Jan 11
Social science has a huge amount to teach us about the causes, impacts of & solutions to the climate crisis, yet is often badly neglected.

Here's a short🧵highlighting some key papers I've recently benefit from reading - what papers would you add? 📖

"What would it mean for sociology to make climate change a core disciplinary concern?" asks @EricKlinenberg et al.

annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114…
The sociological imagination can help us answer "why climate change is happening, how we are being impacted, why we have failed to successfully respond so far, and how we might be able to effectively do so." says Kari Norgaard

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 12 tweets
Nov 1, 2021
So, @BorisJohnson has warned that unless leaders at #COP26 address the #ClimateEmergency, we risk the collapse of civilization. Is this really a possibility?

Unfortunately, yes, many leading climate scientists are indeed warning of collapse 1/n 🧵

independent.co.uk/climate-change…
@BorisJohnson The following quotes are from some of the world's most distinguished climate and earth-system scientists warning of the risks we now face due to decades of inaction… 2/n
@BorisJohnson “...virtually all of us are now convinced that global warming poses a clear & present danger to civilization”

Prof. Lonnie Thompson, former Director of @ByrdPolar 3/n

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Read 13 tweets
Oct 22, 2021
This🧵examines the prominence given to the climate &ecological crises in top tier research journals in the fields of management, business, finance, economics & international relations.

The conclusion is there's a staggering dearth of journal articles across all these fields 1/n
The alarming findings of earth-system sciences make plain that human activities have disrupted our environmental life-support systems to such an extent that we are now in a ‘planetary emergency’ 2/n
nature.com/articles/d4158…
How well is academic research in other disciplines such as the social sciences responding to the need for knowledge on the climate emergency and the responses it demands? 3/n
Read 20 tweets
Sep 27, 2021
A couple of weeks ago @ChathamHouse, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, published a crucial new ‘Climate change Risk Assessment’, which barely made the papers let alone the front pages.

But it REALLY should have done! Here’s why 🧵…

1/n
As stated on the cover of the report we have now reached a stage in the #climatecrisis where:
“The risks are compounding, and without immediate action the impacts will be devastating” 2/n
The report highlights that failure to act means that “cascading climate impacts can be expected to cause higher mortality rates, drive political instability and greater national insecurity, and fuel regional & international conflict” 3/n
Read 16 tweets
Sep 24, 2021
Hi @dpcarrington @guardianeco, I fear this is dangerously over-hyping DAC as a solution & veering into greenwash territory.

Can I ask that you interview some social scientists with a more sober analysis for your next article.
@dpcarrington @guardianeco As @wim_carton et al say it's vital to see NETs such as DAC as a "continuity in the carbon removal discussion and calls for more engagement with existing social science scholarship on the subject."

wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
@dpcarrington @guardianeco @wim_carton We must also be alert as @mclaren_erc et al warn of the tendency towards "exaggerating the expected future contribution of negative emissions in climate models, while also obscuring the extent & pace of the investment needed to deliver negative emissions"

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Read 5 tweets
Sep 10, 2021
Is climate change going to be worse than expected?

Have scientists been systematically underestimating the impacts?

And if so how should we as science communicators convey this to the public & policy makers?

I delve into this unsettling topic in this 🧵 1/n
(Pic: L. Hogarth)
It’s a topic I’ve been pondering for some time. I wrote this blog post back in 2013 before IPCC’s AR5 report was published.

So what has happened since then? Are scientists still saying things are worse than predicted? 2/n

blog.rsb.org.uk/why-climate-ch…
The evidence certainly seems to point in that direction.

Let’s now turn to look at just a few of the many recent examples of scientists who have pointed this out.

I’ll then explore what is causing this bias and how we can perhaps address it. 3/n
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(