Supreme Court to shortly deliver judgment on plea challenging mandatory COVID19 vaccine mandates as unconstitutional #COVIDvaccine#SupremeCourt@pbhushan1
SC: we hare not inclined to entertain any challenge to maintainability of petition. as far as judicial review of expert opinion wide latitude given to executive
SC: court does not have expertise to decide on scientific evidence. we can decide manifest arbitrariness. considering bodily autonomy, bodily integrity is protected under article 21. NO ONE CAN BE FORCED TO GET VACCINATED
SC: Govt can regulate in areas of bodily autonomy. on the basis of material, and considering expert views on severe disease, hospital admissions etc, this court is satisfied that current vaccine policy CANNOT BE SAID TO BE UNREASONABLE
SC: this court is satisfied that current vaccine policy CANNOT BE SAID TO BE MANIFESTLY ARBITRARY. restrictions imposed on individuals through vaccine mandates cannot be called to be PROPORTIONATE.
SC: Till numbers are low, we suggest that relevant orders are followed and no restriction is imposed on individuals on access to public areas or recall the same if already not done.
SC: Regarding segregation of vaccine trial data, subject to privacy of individuals, all trials conducted and to be subsequently conducted, all data must be made available to the public without further delay
SC: Union of India is directed to publish reports on adverse events of vaccines from public and doctors on a publicly accessible system without compromising data of the individuals who are reporting the same #SupremeCourt#COVIDVaccine#VaccineMandate
SC: Regarding vaccine for children, it is not possible for us to second guess the opinion of experts and the vaccination indeed follows the global standards and practices. However data of adverse reactions to be published at the earliest. #SupremeCourt#COVIDVaccine#Vaccine
SC: We thank counsels on either side for their able assistance. With the above directions, the matter stands disposed off. #SupremeCourt#COVIDVaccine#VaccineMandate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chief Justice of India NV Ramana to hold a joint press conference with Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju. CJI Ramana is expected to brief press about the developments in the meeting held with Chief Ministers of all States & UTs and Chief Justices of all High Courts #SupremeCourt
The press conference will begin at 5 PM
CJI Ramana and Union Law Minister @KirenRijiju arrives
Prime Minister Narendra Modi to shortly inaugurate a joint conference of chief ministers and chief justices of high courts in presence of Chief Justice of India N V Ramana, an event which is being held after a gap of six years @narendramodi#SupremeCourt@PMOIndia
The inaugration will be followed by a joint Press Conference by CJI NV Ramana and Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju @KirenRijiju#SupremeCourt
Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju: I welcome Prime Minister Narendra Modi, CJI NV Ramana, and all Chief Justices and Chief Ministers of all states and UTs. This Event is reflective of sabka saath sabka vikaas
Sr Adv Sidharth Luthra, Amicus Curiae in the case: There are 26 lakh cases, and now it’s increased by 7 lakh in 4 to 5 months. That is a disturbing number here. One defaulting area is Delhi and Gujarat has 4 lakh cases, Maharashtra has 5.6 lakhs #NIAct
Justice Ravindra Bhat: there needs to be a greater analysis of pendency
Luthra: only 15% of last year’s pendency has been disposed and then less cases are being disposed every year #NIAct
CJI NV Ramana led bench to hear a plea by #Delhi government challenging the Government of NCT Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2021 over the issue of administrative services #SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: By way of a preface, this court is aware that article 239 AA was inserted after the constitution was framed. Initially there was concept of state were in class A, B etc. Delhi was class C state. Legislature wanted to do something
#SupremeCourt is hearing a matter regarding cancellation of ration cards in Telangana
Bench: What were the grounds?
Counsel: They have grounds cited for general cancellation, but for me no specific criteria/ground cited. 21.94L cards cancelled which were given after verification by ration authorities.
One day say sorry, discontinued. Act of extreme cruelty, poor families rendered w/o cards.
Counsel: [Reads from written submissions] Total ration cards between 83-87, roughly a quarter then cancelled. When we protested lack of notice, their counter was NFSA there is no mention of notice needed
Natural justice means notice should be given. On Aadhaar, made mandatory