Thread: Dan Campbell was one of the workers who operated Nanticoke, North America's largest coal facility. He wasn't sure what to think about climate change & whether his workplace was contributing to childhood asthma or shortening the lives of Ontarians from air pollution 1/
He had worked hard to become very good at his job, enjoyed the challenge of his work and took pride in keeping the lights on across the province. 2/
Luckily when the Ontario government decided to shut down the #coal fleet, Dan, a highly skilled worker, had the opportunity to find work of similar caliber and pay operating a #nuclear reactor @Bruce_Power . 3/
He is proud to have contributed to eliminating smog days in Ontario and to have participated in North America's greatest greenhouse gas reduction as well as producing life saving #medicalisotopes. 4/
Nuclear energy, because of its made in Canada supply chain, concentration of high skilled #union labour and long term integration with the economies of thriving local communities offered Dan a #justtransition. 5/
#CANDU#nuclear’s 96% made in Canada supply chain from the uranium mines, fuel fabrication, heavy industry, operations and maintenance to spent fuel handling offers a vast array of high skills job opportunities to Canadian workers. 6/
This Canadian supply chain coupled with the high wages available in the sector leads to an unparalleled economic multiplier effect meaning that every dollar invested in #CANDU#nuclear generates $1.40 in GDP. 7/
If our government can set a cohesive evidence based industrial policy building off of CANDU and the Ontario coal phaseout we can have a credible #justtransition for Canadian fossil fuel workers which will drive decisive climate action with prosperity across the whole country. 8/
“CHRIS KEEFER, a physician and part-time pro-nuclear energy advocate will be meeting with MPs and holding a press conference in Ottawa today, in a bid to put pressure on the government to change its energy policy.” 1/
“Nuclear energy was arguably given short shrift in the government’s recently-released greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan for 2030.” 2/
The plan continued the government line of enthusiasm for SMR’s-an intriguing but still hypothetical soln to the problem of powering remote communities that now burn diesel-but otherwise ignored the possibility of ramping up nuclear to lower Canada’s GHG emissions. 3/
Is a “Just Transition” away from fossil fuels towards a decarbonized energy system technology specific? The basket of available & scalable technologies: Wind, Solar & Nuclear each come with characteristics that determine wages, levels of unionization & security of employment.🧵1/
When #GreenNewDealers imagine the jobs of a clean energy transition, they often nostalgically harken back to the post war era when generations of blue collar workers could support families on a single income in a unionized workplace & afford to send their kids to college. 2/
This was the reality of many blue collar jobs before the neoliberal era crushed the labour movement. As a result, much of Western manufacturing was offshored, leading to a cut throat race to the bottom for wages & working conditions. 3/
I was recently featured in a @simonahac “gotcha tweet” regarding the lifespan of renewable energy projects. There are some major problems with @simonahac's reasoning which I will go into below. I’ll avoid the mudslinging and name calling and stick to the facts. Thread
2.) TL:DR The renewables industry themselves and independent organizations claim an average lifespan of wind of 20 years and of solar panels of 25-30 years. I will argue below that the solar numbers are likely exaggerated. twi-global.com/technical-know… greenbiz.com/article/what-w…
3.) @simonahac's overheated rhetoric overshadows two troubling flaws in his argument. 1.) He cherry picks examples of long lived installations instead of examining sources with a larger more representative sample 2.) He relies on manufacturer warranties as evidence.
@AdamBlazowski is a founder of the Polish pragmatic environmentalist group FOTA4Climate. FOTA came together in 2018 out of a frustration with the limits of the mainstream environmental movement. Check out the interview on the @DecouplePodcastanchor.fm/chris15401/epi…
2.) @fota4climate includes a broad spectrum of experts and activists ranging from energy analysts to herpetologists and characterizes itself as a “tech agnostic group.”
3.) @fota4climate are supportive of nuclear energy not because of a bias towards the technology but rather because they believe it is the most effective means to the end of preserving bio-diversity, mitigating climate change and maintaining human development.
I am joined by @Heather_mom4nuk on the @DecouplePodcast. Heather is the co-founder of Mothers for Nuclear. She is a materials scientist, nuclear reactor operator at Diablo Canyon and a lifelong environmentalist. anchor.fm/chris15401/epi…
In the words of their website @moms4nuclear is an organization of environmentalists, humanitarians, and caring human beings.
3.) "We were initially skeptical of nuclear, but learned through asking a lot of questions. We started Mothers for Nuclear as a way to share our stories and begin a dialogue with others who want to protect nature for future generations."
I am joined by @E_R_Sepulveda, a telecoms regulatory economist with an interest in the electricity sector focussing on restructuring and privatization for a deep dive of electricity regulation and deregulation and its impacts on deep decarbonisation. anchor.fm/chris15401/epi…
2.) We begin with the first private companies at the dawn of electrification in the 1880’s and the populist push to exert some form of public control to curb abusive pricing, including setting up regulatory commissions to protect the public interest.
3.) Consolidation from this multi-private operator model to the “traditional” monopoly vertically-integrated firm occurred after World War II, when the idea that strategic sectors should be publicly-owned via state-owned enterprises (SOEs) drove a series of nationalizations.