Pawar deposing: In recent times it has been observed that section 124A of IPC is often misused against people. I have explained in my affidavit… it is invoked to suppress their liberty and tend to stifle any voice of dissent raised in a peaceful and democratic way. #SharadPawar
Pawar: I propose to raise this issue at appropriate forum like Parliament being Member of Rajyasabha.
If any political leader address the people and his speech is likely to cause disturbance to the law and order then that leader should be responsible for the consequences.
Pawar: It will be proper if a place is earmarked for holding political social protests… to facilitate them to hold such programs so that the common man isn't put to inconvenience… #SharadPawar#BhimaKoregaon
Pawar: …and it can also act as a safeguard to public and private property as such programs if turn violent can be conveniently managed by the police machinery which is responsible for maintainin law and order.
Satpute: Should the commission call leaders like Uddhav Thackeray, Devendra Fadnavis, Prakash Ambedkar and even Ramdas Athawale for ensuring there isn't such situation again in future?
Pawar’s lawyer and Pradhan object to questions about Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote's ideologies.
Request for cross examination to stick to the affidavits.
Another witness Harshali Potdar: I was forced to answer questions which were about personal ideology, and facts outside the affidavit. Still I answered each and every question.
Pawar: I came to know about the incident on January 1, 2018 through media. After constitution of the Commission of Inquiry (present commission), I received notice requesting me to give my suggestions in the matter in accordance with the Terms of Reference…
Another lawyer asks: Whether you have stated in the press that the investigation done by the Police regarding the Elgar Parishad is a stigma on the police department?
Pawar: I have stated that it was not correct or proper on part of police have filed cases against certain persons who were not present at the Elgar Parishad held on December 31, 2017 at Shanivarvada, Pune.
Pawar: The incident of #BhimaKoregaon and Elgar Parishad are two different and separate issues. I am aware that an eminent Judge late Justice PB Sawant, former judge of #SupremeCourt was to preside over Elgar, I feel that there was nothing wrong could have taken place.
Pawar: The speeches in Elgar Parishad may have been an outrcy against oppression and atrocities committed against weaker section, which does not amount to committing any offence under law.
Pradhan reads Pawar’s affidavit: While making this statement, you didn't had any personal knowledge about the incident which you have referred to in the first para and your information was only based on press reports and other sources and it was a hearsay.
Pawar: it is correct. I have filed the said affidavit in October 2018 and in January 2018 some offences came to be registered at Police station Shikrapur i.e. 2 crime number and one at Pimpri Police Station.
Supreme Court will soon hear MP Navneet Kaur Rana's plea against the decision of the Bombay High Court cancelling and confiscating her caste certificate.
A Bench of Justices RD Dhanuka and VG Bisht had held that Rana obtained the caste certificate by fabricating records to enable her to contest the parliamentary elections through reserved category candidature.
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing matters of pvt tour operators seeking GST and service tax exemption for Hajj
State to argue today
Sr Advs Arvind Datar and Gopal Sankaranarayan submitted in court yesterday
Bench: One contention is no intelligible differentia between pvt and Hajj Group operators
Adv: Distinction was challenged but court did not interfere as based on policy matters. Ultimately organising travel to Hajj. Threshold requirement in service tax law is
Adv: Service provider, receiver, Provision of service, and backed by a consideration.
A contract driven law, that's why making difference between pilgrim, pilgromage and operator
Bench: Operator as facilitator of religious ceremony?
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by terror-accused Abu Saleem which seeks for #India’s compliance with the assurances given to #Portugal to not keep him in jail for more than 25 years from the time he was #arrested, that is, in 2002.
Adv for Salem: I will show it from the judgment of the Portugal court to show that the assurance is in place.
Adv for Abu Salem now reads the judgment of the Portugal Court before the Bench of Justices Kaul and Sundresh.
#BombayHighCourt hearing plea pertaining to organ transplantation of a minor girl to her ailing father directs hospital authorization committee to take a decision by May 6.
Government Pleader PP Kakade: State govt department has not received any documents or forms from the Global Hospital authorization committee, where the father is admitted.
Kakade: Even if the authorization committee decides against transplantation, the state govt department can take an independent view from the authorization committee.