Oral boards for #RadOnc are approaching. Here is advice to anyone taking the exam.

@ARRO_org @ASTRO_org @ACRORadOnc @ACROresident
1, #RadOnc oral boards are the most clinically relevant exams (vs rad bio, physics, written exam, inservice, etc).
Many of the questions about management come straight from @NCCN guidelines, so use these as a primary reference.
2, have a prepared script of what to say for standard questions. eg, workup, setup, margins, doses

Here is an example for prostate ca history / workup
#pcsm
3, if there is a metric to assess symptoms, use the metric.
Eg,
🚫“I will ask about GU symptoms”
✅ "I will use the AUA IPSS to assess GU bother symptoms"

Otherwise, the examiner will not know exactly what you are referring to, and it will take extra time to get the info.
4, Answer just the question being asked, succinctly.

There is no need to go off on tangent about other treatments, cancers, etc.
5, when recommending a treatment strategy, consider pausing to say “this pt has cancer X, stage X, risk group X. Based on @NCCN guidelines, my recommended tx is X.”
6, do not go off on a tangent to say “there was a study…”

You examiner may have been on the study and will follow up with a bunch of questions about it.
7, Your goal is to get through as many cases as you can in each session. Eg, aim for 5-6.
If you can only get through 1 case because you spent the whole time discussing workup, it doesn't let the examiner evaluate your understanding of management.
8, questions are at different difficulty levels. Examiners may keep asking more details until you don’t know.
Lower level = anatomy.
Mid level = stage, treatment options, doses.
Higher level = chemo doses, prep.
You're not always expected to know every high level question.
9, If you don’t know, say you don’t know and you would look it up. You don’t want to recommend the incorrect treatment for the pt.
10, In general, “I would let my dosimetrist/physicist/etc figure this out” is never the right answer.
11, sometimes, the best dose is 0 Gy (i.e., observation)
12, know a guideline concordant dose and constraint set. There are often multiple options, but you may be able to just talk about one that you are comfortable with.

eg, options for prostate ca #pcsm
Thanks to @DrSpratticus for integrating this in @NCCN guidelines
13, say that you will discuss the pt's case at tumor board.
That's what radoncs normally do anyway :-)
14, moderate hypofractionation (vs conventional 2 Gy fractions) has become the standard of care for multiple disease sites, eg breast, prostate.

15, for some disease sites, there is a condensed formula for treatment.
Well done, @jryckman3
16, If you don't want to memorize dose ranges, consider picking a number in the range
Thanks @drbeckta
17, study with a group and do a ton of cases.

It helped me immensely to have experts like @DanTrifMD ask me about CNS cases and @LeilaTchelebi ask about GI cases.
18, for younger patients, always consider fertility preservation, treatment impact on GU organs
19, do mock oral boards.
Your residency program should have mock oral exams.
Additionally, some programs have awesome formal mock orals (eg, U Maryland) for anyone in the US.
@MarkMishraMD @SbrtSean
20, for locally advanced definitive chemo RT cases when not meeting dose constraints (eg head and neck, near brainstem), consider:
1, neoadjuvant chemo, assess response
2, resim after a few weeks
3, decrease PTV margin
21, Address emergent issues first. eg, bladder cancer, and CT shown has this, what next?

Address hydronephrosis, eg w stent, before talking about tx options.
Otherwise, your next prompt will be "pt was hospitalized with mental status changes."
22, for any diagnostic test during workup, ask to compare to prior tests.
eg:
lung ca screening CT
breast ca mammogram
prostate ca PSA

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Zaorsky, MD MS

Nicholas Zaorsky, MD MS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NicholasZaorsky

Apr 8
How to run a meeting at an academic medical center

🧵
Originally, this presentation was for our oncology trainees, and we figured we would share it on #AcademicTwitter #MedTwitter to maximize the impact of your meetings.

Thanks to @DrSpratticus @LeilaTchelebi @EricLehrer @TimShowalter1 @RonaldChenMD @nytimes @HarvardBiz et al
1. Do you really need a meeting?

Consider an email if:
you're just sharing info
there is no discussion or decision
you've already had a similar meeting
Read 14 tweets
Feb 28
Health services research using United States cancer databases

Here is everything you want to know about @theNCI SEER, @AmericanCancer @AmCollSurgeons NCDB, and newer claims databases for clinical research in oncology

🧵 ImageImage
First, many thanks to these great people for helping me with the material Image
Retrospective databases are ideal for certain types of questions related to epidemiology, staging, rare diseases, quality, prognostication, prediction, and some "real world evidence / data" Image
Read 49 tweets
Jan 9
Advice for mentees (eg, med students, residents, junior faculty) who want to publish a manuscript
1. Research your mentor.

Know their body of work, content expertise
Do they routinely work w trainees?
Ask mentees who have worked w this mentor what the experience is like
For example, I see work of @DrSpratticus and the people who are thankful to receive his guidance.

@RadoncUh @UHhospitals trainees and faculty are lucky to have @DrSpratticus.

@annalaucis @DanWahlMD @UMichRadOnc @BaydounMDPhD

Read 25 tweets
Jan 7
Guide to writing a medical research manuscript

bit.ly/ZaorskyManuscr…

Here is advice after writing, reading, and reviewing 1000+ manuscripts.

#MedTwitter Image
Why do we do medical research?

There are at least two problems with medicine:
(1) in 100 years, half of it will be proven to be false;
(2) we don’t know which half.
Success in our research career depends on these 3 pillars.

Thanks to @freddyeescorcia for the slide. Image
Read 108 tweets
Aug 27, 2021
Facility volume has been explored as a surrogate of quality of care in medicine.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12230353/
@AnnalsofIM
In oncology, facility surgical volume is correlated with survival.

Work from @StoltzfusKelsey @LeilaTchelebi @DanTrifMD @NirajGusani in @JNCCN

Read 17 tweets
Aug 9, 2021
Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: international consensus on evaluation and management

@NatRevUrol

rdcu.be/csM2z
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34363040/
#PCSM ImageImage
Since the 2000s, the use of radical prostatectomy has been increasing for prostate cancer (vs external beam and brachytherapy).

@EUplatinum
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27597241/ Image
The increase in prostatectomy includes all risk groups, particularly those with high-risk features

Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(