- ST: Fell, hit 3999.50/3925.50 target range as forecast; RSI in reversal range; Model is bullish, nears reversal
- MT: Bullish; unchanged target at 5558.25/5559.50
- LT: Bearish
$ES:
ST/MT: unchanged forecast (thread)
$ES (S&P-500 e-Mini Futures):
- ST: high-probability reversal at 3896.75/3882.50 target range; 3882.50 favored; invalidated if breaks below wave-C⃝ = 3807.50
- ST: bullish; still moving as forecast (see thread)
- MT: bullish; interim resistance circa 4600.00; still eyeing 5558.25/5559.50 bearish reversal target
- ST: bearish
- ST: prior impulse invalidated; for current EW pattern (expanding leading diagonal: 5-3-5-3-5) to survive, wave-(4) must end at/near 3838.00 (circa 08-12 SEP per tentative timing)
- MT: bullish
- LT: bearish
- ST: falling towards 3838.00 target as forecast; time-target saw rallies on weaker volume; now eyeing strength circa 21 SEP ‘22 as possible confluence of price-target and time-target levels.
- MT: bullish
- LT: bearish
- ST: RISK of lower low from current vicinity, eyeing interim and imminent bearish reversal at the 4027.50/4134.00 target range; eyeing bullish reversal target at 3402.25
- MT: bullish
- LT: bearish
- ST: still reversing as forecast from its bearish reversal target range at 4027.50/4134.00 target range; watching for interim support at 3842.00/3833.75; unchanged RISK of decline to 3402.25
- MT: bullish
- LT: bearish
For a rally to occur right away (i.e.: a Santa Claus Rally, plus setting aside historical facts that it could occur until a week from now and it would require beating the 7.3% record gain), a 4134.00 ceiling …
… constitute the type of resistance that may best be overcome by the force compression assimilated in inter-collapsing, strength-gathering geometries, such as Ending Diagonal.
Just a thought.
D.
$ES:
PERSPECTIVE:
Here is a good follow, giving winning trades; here offering a similar perspective on a lingering bear strength in $SPY:
- RT from @Mr_Derivatives:
- ST: price reacted to bullish target range at 3842.00/3833.75 as forecast; watching for high-prob RISK of reversal from 4030.00 towards 3402.25/3388.50 bullish reversal target range as shown
- MT: bullish
- LT: bearish
- ST: price remains above 3842.00/3833.75, still eyeing for high-prob RISK of reversal from 4030.00 to 3402.25/3388.50; watching for reversal circa 10 JAN ‘23
- MT: bullish
- LT: bearish
- ST: still bearish with little more than sideways action over the week. Window for a SCR closed, adding credence for a bearish continuation thesis. Watching for this setup favoring further decline to 3402.25/3388.50. Last two charts are tentative, yet favored counts.
$SPX
$ES:
- ST: unchanged bearish bias per model; technically, continuation geometries support bearish outlook as well; watching for 3788.50 to trigger a still favored decline to 3402.25/3388.50.
- ST: still bearish, despite interim consolidation; recent move appears impulsive (1-2-3-4-5) to the downside, suggesting possible beginning of wave-C⃝.
In any case and any interim configuration, predictive model remains bound towards target range below.
- ST: still bearish; current level is highest reversal from interim bullish reversal at 3842.00/3833.75 (see thread), before reaching invalidation > 4180.00
- MT: bullish, still eyeing reversal at 3402.25/3388.50; highest reversibility at 3191.25
- ST: Model remains bearish. Unrelated to the predictive model, note the development of a NEGATIVE DIVERGENCE in RSI (i.e.: RSI makes a higher high relative to price peaks, whereas price makes a lower-high.
(…) As a point of illustration - and perhaps of education to those who aimlessly look for bearish divergences - here is the same chart but WEEKLY frames, wherein a same (-) Div. occurred recently, and appears to prepare once more.
(…)
(…) it would take price breaking above and closing above (BACA) its recent high at 4180.00 to erase the (-) Div in the DAILY chart.
I recently tried to explain this concept to a trader convinced that fundamental hype would support price (see attached), when it ended up falling.
Overall, know your divergences. Most rookies will use RSI in ways instructed by conventional institutions.
Notions such as over/under-bought or bearish/bullish divergences are NOT helping anyone. If anything, they do NOT signal anything of imminent relevance.
Trust, but verify!
Tech-Note Addendum:
Re: (-)Div.:
Here is another illustration from $DNN, where a (-) Div would still work (i.e.: RSI highs vs lower price spikes), even in the even that a price carves a perfect double-top (here at 1.52).
Until price carved a higher-high at 1.53, (-)Div stands.
(…) Remember, you’re only dealing with probabilities (and don’t think numbers, just LOW/MOD/HIGH probability of an event occurring.
Bullish/bearish divergences- for reasons I have illustrated in the linked thread above - are LOW probability of an imminent directional event.
…
(…) In contrast, POSITIVE or NEGATIVE Divergences are rarer events with greater specificity (i.e.: “they do what they say they’ll do”), while being rare events (i.e. low sensitivity), whereas bearish/bullish divergences are very sensitive (“ring a lot”), but have a very low (…)
(…) specificity (i.e.: “they talk a lot about doing it, but don’t or not as immediately”).
Review the linked thread for illustrations, and rehearse these in your own (Google them under my alias too; been talking about these for a long while).
Cheers,
David
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delta allowed co-infections with RSV, para-influenza, influenza-A and -B, and Strep-A as early as early as last August when these co-infections do not typically occur.
Then we had re-infections by Delta after a first one.
Now, expect …
@RickshawTrade@EpsilonTheory … re-infections and co-infections, along with unknown long-term consequences and sequelae.
What’s more is that the deaths in our my hospital were merely starting with mild symptoms, but led to diffuse clots 2-4 weeks after recovering from infection.
Common misconception…
@RickshawTrade@EpsilonTheory … is to equate severity of the initial phase (viral infection) with risk of death (virulence), when in fact, the two are in correlated.
Most of our deaths occurred with mild disease courses, about 2-4 weeks afterwards.
Most commonly, patients died of PE or other clotting …
“The Panic of 1873 was a financial crisis that triggered an economic depression in Europe and North America that lasted from 1873 until 1877.”
- Source: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_…
1932:
“The next day, Black Tuesday, bids completely vanished, and the market fell another 12%. From there, the market trended lower until hitting bottom in 1932.”
- Source: investopedia.com/ask/answers/04…