Sentient Profile picture
May 18, 2022 7 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Diet news that presents ever-changing and sometimes contradictory advice creates the impression that #nutrition scientists constantly change their minds.

How can newsreaders better navigate the difficult landscape of #diet news? Here are five useful steps and resources.👇 1/7
Check out these 10 red flags to identify misleading diet claims by @ColoradoStateU, including:

- non-scientific testimonials
- lists of “good” & “bad” #foods
- recommendations based on one study
- simplistic conclusions drawn from a complex study

2/7
➡️extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/nu… Image
A @HarvardChanSPH guide encourages readers to put #HealthNews into context by asking 7 questions, including:

- How does the study fit into the body of evidence on a topic?
- How large was its sample size?
- Was it done on #animals or humans?

3/7
➡️hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsourc… Image
Readers can also check what an outlet’s editorial standards say about health reporting.

E.g., @usnews has pledged to provide accurate information about medical issues & exclude experts from scoring #diets with which they have a conflict of interest. 4/7
➡️usnews.com/about-us/edito… Image
Checking diet news for conflict of interest is essential because #BigAg often lobbies to promote specific foods.

@MeatInstitute and @TheAHDB, for example, have a record of influencing US and UK dietary guidelines. 5/7
➡️desmog.com/agribusiness-d…
➡️desmog.com/agribusiness-d… Image
Looking for #PeerReviews can also help to understand new findings.

Peer reviews are written by experts who work in similar fields and have similar competencies as the authors of new studies—in the case of diet studies: #nutrition and medicine. 6/7 Image
At @Sentient_Media, we report fact-led information about the underreported impacts #animal agriculture has on our lives, diets, and health.

Join our spring drive to help us continue our reporting on #FactoryFarming and other food system issues. 7/7👇
sentientmedia.org/join-sentient-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sentient

Sentient Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Sentient_Media

Jul 7, 2023
Here are Sentient Media's top stories in animals, food, climate and health for the week of July 3, 2023 🧵
Is Avian Flu Already Endemic? Here’s What Scientists Know: The “sick bird markets” of Indonesia hold answers for our future with bird flu, a growing body of research suggests. Francesco deAugustinis explains:
sentientmedia.org/avian-flu-alre…
Rosie's Farm Sanctuary Is Strategizing To Save Animals: Michele Waldman realized she couldn’t save all the farm animals. But each cow, pig and hen at Rosie’s Farm Sanctuary serves as an ambassador on behalf of the billions. Jennifer Mishler shares more:
sentientmedia.org/rosies-farm-sa…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 10, 2023
This week, @SarahHuckabee supported a law that ends one of Arkansas' only oversight mechanisms for child labor.

Here's why labor laws are crucial to protect vulnerable groups from being targeted by a sector, which is chronically understaffed: the meat industry.👇 1/10
The law signed by Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders eliminates requirements for the state to verify the age of children under the age of 16 before they can take a job.

@zhang_sharon report via @truthout. 2/10
truthout.org/articles/arkan…
Currently, children in Arkansas under 16 have to verify their age and provide a description of the work schedule and a parent or legal guardian’s consent.

@diegolasarte reports how the new law removes these protections via @qz. 3/10
qz.com/arkansas-child…
Read 10 tweets
Feb 23, 2023
This week, the @US_FDA announced that plant-based milk alternatives can be labeled “milk” but should identify nutritional differences from cow’s milk on front-of-package labeling.

Plant-based producers, consumers and dairy groups alike have criticized this move. 👇 1/7 Image
According to the FDA, consumers do not fully understand nutrient differences.

The agency calls for labels that note when plant-based products have lower or higher levels of nutrients than cow’s milk, such as protein or calcium. @JoNel_Aleccia @AP 2/7
abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireSto…
Although the draft guidance is nonbinding, the move has been criticized from many different directions.

The National Milk Producers Federation welcomed the new nutrition labels but accused the FDA of "decades of inaction on dairy labeling." 3/7
Read 7 tweets
Feb 16, 2023
The Netherlands is one of the only countries committed to scaling down its livestock sector.

The decision is motivated by a severe pollution crisis but far-right influencers have latched onto this issue, spreading misinformation.👇 #stikstofcrisis 1/11
In a viral video, @rustyrockets described the pollution crisis as a “scam” claiming the Netherlands aims "to bankrupt the farmers, so their land can be grabbed"

@guardian columnist @GeorgeMonbiot explains why these claims are damaging & misleading. 2/11
The Netherlands has a nitrate crisis because of its livestock sector.

With around 3.8 million cows, 11 million pigs & 100 million chickens, the country has the highest density of livestock in Europe, more than four times that of the UK. @tom_levitt 3/11
theguardian.com/environment/20…
Read 11 tweets
Feb 3, 2023
This week, people have been discussing if we should eat pork instead of beef to protect planetary health.

Today, we are taking a close look at the environmental, ethical and health consequences such a switch would entail. 1/11 Image
If US Americans ate pork instead of beef, the amount of pork eaten per capita would rise from 51 pounds to 110 pounds.

To make this move possible, the population of farmed pigs would have to increase massively, more than doubling in size. 2/11
ers.usda.gov/data-products/… Image
Raising pigs for food does generate fewer GHG emissions than raising cows: 1 kg of pork produces 7 kg of CO2e compared to 60 kg of CO2e for 1 kg of beef.

But pork has problematic impacts beyond the industry's carbon footprint. @WeAnimals 3/11 Image
Read 11 tweets
Feb 2, 2023
As a short-lived but potent greenhouse gas, methane plays a make-or-break role in fending off catastrophic warming in our immediate future.

Today, we are taking a close look at different methods to measure methane emissions and their pros and cons.👇1/13
sentientmedia.org/measuring-meth…
Because many greenhouse gases contribute to climate change, researchers rely on equations called “Global Warming Potentials” (GWPs) to compare the impacts of different gases.

Using GWPs allows us to convert emissions into comparable CO2 equivalents. 2/13
epa.gov/ghgemissions/u…
Because all gasses are measured against carbon dioxide, the GWP of CO2 is 1, regardless of what time frame we look at.

The GWP of methane does depend on time: Over the span of 20 years, methane is ~81 times more powerful at warming the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. 3/13
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(