The report analyses Xi’s thinking and the centralised decision-making behind Xinjiang policy, institutional shifts to ensure policy implementation, and the arbitrary nature of mass detention of Turkic-speaking Muslim communities.
2.
It explains how China’s political system operates and analyses the thinking behind genocide in Xinjiang. The PRC is moving towards totalitarianism: personalised rule, mass mobilisation and surveillance, and ideological education.
3.
Under Xi’s rule, over a million Uyghurs & Kazakhs have been extralegally detained, subjected to sexual violence, child-separation, and trauma. Outside the camps, they navigate security checkpoints, hi-tech surveillance, & forced labour.
4.
Xi’s Xinjiang policy targets signs of everyday Uyghur identity as security threats. The goal is cultural destruction of Uyghur communities and the rewriting of their history as a Chinese minority, termed “Sinicisation” policy.
5.
Central party documents dismiss Uyghurs’ Turkic and Islamic identities as inauthentic: “Uyghurs’ ancestors were oppressed by Turks,” and “Uyghurs are not descendants of the Turks and have no relationship with Turkey.”
6.
Cadres and security personnel study these narratives of history and culture in ideological education sessions and are given long lists of potential signs of identity or minor misbehaviours to round people up for mass detention.
7.
Regular party meetings and education sessions for cadres and security personnel outline Xi’s ideological principles and the severe punishments for alternative thought or failing to implement central orders (e.g., Wang Yongzhi's punishment for"violations of discipline").
8.
Xi’s “People’s war on terror” links party institutions, security, & neighbourhoods to monitor identities and guard against signs of everyday dissatisfaction, using mass mobilisation and human surveillance.
The report also provides new evidence of local implementation of mass detention and dispersal of Uyghurs. Cadres are examined on implementation of central policy & signs of danger to report, particularly people who want to go abroad.
10.
The report analyses the Konasheher list, showing how “population optimisation” policy disperses Uyghur communities and mass detention is conducted on a door-to-door basis.
Many heavy sentences include those given for the vaguely defined “picking quarrels.” One of the best documented cases of arbitrary detention included is Memeteli Abdureshit.
Policymakers must now grapple with the reality of the PRC’s power and its totalitarian institutional structure under Xi, which shapes its diplomacy towards the political goals of repression of Turkic and Islamic identities at home and abroad.
14.
Thank you to @ShefUniSEAS for their support in the writing of this report and to @HannahTheaker1 and the @UyghurJustice for their vital contributions to this research.
15. And huge gratitude to the @UniShefAH for supporting this research and helping make @sheffielduni a hub for innovative, multidisciplinary research.
16. CORRECTION: the correct version of the report has now been uploaded. The correct version has a white and blue university logo, NOT the black logo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some book reviews! My fieldwork in Urumchi #Xinjiang planned to explore relations between Han, #Uyghurs, & party-state, particularly how urban groups most exposed to party education understand each other and how interactions shape #nationalism#security
What wasn't planned was 2009 mass violence. Han & #Uyghurs explained violence with narratives familiar from living there previously but crystallised into starker boundaries & insecurity. #China's party-state framed Uyghur identities as security problems, intensifying insecurity.
I had hoped to live there again during more peaceful times and even explore some themes in the reviews below. But Xi's ethnic extinction policies and his closed "new era" means we have to learn and use new methods.
After the 2009 violence between Han, #Uyghurs, and #Xinjiang’s security organs, #China’s party-state used region-wide compulsory “ethnic unity education” to "defeat separatism." A key text from those classes is now available. What does it tell us? 🧵
The text is hosted on @YXiaocuo ‘s Xinjiang Documentation Project website. Their goal is to uplift survivors’ voices and create a reliable resource to combat state-sponsored erasure of evidence and partisan presentation of the crisis in Xinjiang
To pass compulsory “ethnic unity” (minzu tuanjie) exams, schoolchildren, students, and state employees had to chant together in class and pass exams on their own identity and official narratives of history and separatism
I reviewed The Xinjiang Papers by @adrianzenz, official document leak from China’s party-state. His argument that targeting of Uyghurs intensified under Xi Jinping’s commands is clearly made, logically sound, and supported with strong evidence. A thread 🧵 uyghurtribunal.com
1.
Authentication.
I read original documents and would have refused to review this without them. These can’t be released to protect people’s safety....
2.
...The transcripts are accurate. Most policies and narratives (Sinicisation, Three Evils, Great Revival) are familiar from researching official media, cadre meetings, and “patriotic education”. Many quotes and references to the documents are online.
What have we learned in 11 years since mass violence between Han, #Uyghurs, and the state in #Xinjiang?
Since the emergence of internment camps sparked wider interest in the subject, many discussions catalogue incidents of violence and describe how the party-state responded. Considerably less attention is paid to why the state responds this way
...particularly why it conceives and punishes some acts of violence and resistance as existential threats but not others. Leaving underlying thinking behind policy and state violence unproblematised rationalises the behaviour and interests of the state as natural and inevitable.