#BITCOIN UPDATE THREAD ⚡

The smaller dashed channel remains my primary case, mapping out waves 1 though 4 with perfect touches at the channel bounds. Wave 5 higher is still missing.

Lots of charts! Lets get into it...

🧵1/
In both channels we can draw a tight lower boundary, as well as one that captures deviations.

In the smaller channel, #Bitcoin has now broken the tight boundary and consumed the full extent of the Covid deviation.

Is the Luna crash simply another deviation?

🧵2/
Taking a step back to the failed Triangle count, the mistake was to assume that the market did not need to consume the covid deviation. I was wrong.

Break of 33k #Bitcoin invalidated the Triangle and I switched to my alternate count which I will cover next.

🧵3/
Alternate count in more detail. Double combination, with double zigzag in Y.

Is this count complete at the channel boundary?

🧵4/
The price action off the low looks corrective, not impulsive, however, #Bitcoin looked a lot like that after the low in June 2021, so on that basis I think this count could be considered complete as shown.

Bearish alternatives next...

🧵5/
For reference, here is #Bitcoin mid 2021. Corrective price action doesn't necessarily mean we have to put in another low. In one case we went lower, the other we did not.

What we got was an incredible 3 month opportunity to accumulate, so just keep that in mind.

🧵6/
One alternative count is a regular WXY.

This would take #Bitcoin down to it's long term moving averages and provide a more convincing bottom.

I don't like the A wave count because of the Dec liquidation wick, but here it is anyway.

🧵7/
The other alternative for #Bitcoin where there are no ambiguities in the count, is a wave 4 expanded flat with a diagonal in C.

Note this is valid only up to about 37k because 4 needs to be shorter than 2.

🧵8/
Because we are so close to the 200wma it is probable that buyers won't come in until we reach it.

However, because I do not see this as a cycle low (even if we touch it), I think it is equally possible that we maintain the channel and find our wave 5 high first.

🧵9/
3 counts, 1 bullish, 2 short term bearish, but my overall thesis that we are in a primary Wave 4 correction is still valid whether we hit the 200wma or not.

For me, it's just time to DCA across whatever lows the market gives us, and be ready for wave 5.

#Bitcoin

🧵10/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Proof of Steve ⚡

Proof of Steve ⚡ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @decodejar

Mar 21
A thread of threads. #Bitcoin #Crypto

I believe I've done the due diligence to back my consistent stance that we are in a large wave 4 correction with a wave 5 impulse yet to come.

I spend a great deal of time looking at both side of the coin.

🧵1/5 Image
I considered many bearish macro counts in detail. I wrote a thread here:



You don't see those counts around CT as much anymore. Many of the proponents of them have moved on, posted new counts.

🧵2/5
In considering the large wave 4 correction, I have also always looked at many bearish options.



Today the only bear count I still maintain is the double zig zag. I think it's the only valid option left.

🧵3/5
Read 5 tweets
Mar 14
#Bitcoin Update.

I've had a few days off and sentiment seems to be even worse now! Looking at the charts though... nothing has happened. 🤷‍♂️

Certainly a move is coming soon...

🧵1/7
Bearish scenarios seem to be in the same ball park:

- 29k is a popular bottom call on CT
- My EWT bear count has a fib target at 28,750
- Onchain models suggest a floor of 27k

There are also some calls for capitulation to the bottom of the regression channel (good luck)!

🧵2/7
Starting at the bottom, onchain models suggest a floor price of ~27k; the same floor set by the 2020 crash; an extraordinary event.

Charts from @TheRealPlanC and @therationalroot.

I'd wager we won't see those prices without a major catalyst, and the war didn't do it.

🧵3/7
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
#Bitcoin EWT update.

1/ Wave 4 Double Combination.

I prefer this WXY over an ABC running flat because of low volume in the would-be C wave, and it counts better as a zig-zig. I'm being technical, but it changes the options.

Is it finished?

🧵👇
2/ Wave 4 Running Triangle.

The WXY is a three wave structure; as is an ABCDE triangle. Two more three wave swings would give us a neat triangle.

The E wave could hold 40k support or find the lower trendline. That would suck in the H&S bears nicely!

👇
3/ Wave 5 Impulse.

If you're in the ABC running flat camp, or you think the WXY is completed, then this is your only option.

Impulse higher, find the top of the channel and moon! I say that for comedy, but the option is real.

It's just a little too messy off the low IMO.

👇
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(