Muge Cevik Profile picture
May 21 29 tweets 9 min read
As the monkeypox virus (MPX) outbreak continues, a lot of data emerging in real-time & being rapidly disseminated (as well as misinformation). I complied the unfolding scientific data (with direct links to papers and threads) on what we (don’t) know so far. #IDTwitter 🧵(1/n)
First, MPXV is not a novel virus. It is a viral zoonosis first discovered in 1958, with the first human infection reported in 1970. It is classified as a high priority pathogen by WHO, cases mostly identified in central & western Africa until now. (2/n) (who.int/news-room/fact…\)
Confirmed and suspected cases of #MonkeyPox now reached 145 among 13 countries with 20 cases in the UK. The main concern is that there are non-travel associated cases in Europe, meaning there is likely unnoticed community transmission. (3/n)
The first case detected was in London on 7 May related to travel from Nigeria, followed by additional cases across England & is the first outbreak of community transmission in Europe. The global reach of transmission for this outbreak is beyond that previously experienced. (4/n)
The precise drivers & ongoing global risk is not entirely well defined. However, we have now learned a few things, which provide crucial answers. Normally, MXP doesn’t spread efficiently h2h. So, one of the concerns was whether this a new & more transmissible strain of MPX. (5/n)
Full genome sequence of a MPX case in Belgium shows that the protein coding sequence appears identical to that of a sequence from 2018 from the UK (linked to Nigeria). This preliminary data argue against evolutionary adaptation. (6/n)
But sequencing is ongoing - although these are closely related to 2018 MXP we can’t completely rule out a mutation conferring enhanced transmissibility. Sequencing to greater depth will improve quality of the consensus genomes. See A Rambaut et al. (cont)
virological.org/t/discussion-o…
If MXP didn’t suddenly become better at infecting people and our previous knowledge in regard to its transmission dynamics remain the same, why are we seeing a lot of cases all of a sudden? There are some clues in the epidemiological data gathered so far. (7/n)
~65% of cases are identified in 4 countries - UK (20), Portugal (34), Spain (53) & Canada (22), and clusters of cases include many men who have sex with men (MSM). This has raised Qs about a new route of transmission, but prolonged close contact is how MXP normally spreads. (8/n)
MPX primarily presents as a vesicular-pustular illness (skin lesions), preceded by fever, headache, muscle aches and fatigue. MXP is transmissible from the time when skin lesions appear, throughout the entire course of illness [i.e. all lesions have healed]. (9/n)
While we still need to estimate the incubation period of the current outbreak, from the historical evidence, MXP has a long-ish incubation period. So, cases we are seeing at the moment relates to an event or events that happened a few weeks ago.  (10/n)
Throughout the covid19 pandemic, my main research focused on transmission dynamics. And network dynamics are the most important factor that define how a virus spreads. Network related factors include network size, density of connections, & link to high-risk activities. (11/n)
Sexual networks can allow linkage of seemingly isolated outbreaks. For instance, Spanish researchers are investigating a linkage to sauna as a common exposure setting, which fits within close contact definition. (12/n) (theolivepress.es/spain-news/202…\)
Larger, more densely connected networks, closer to the core, can be associated with steep rises in incidence. For instance, introduction to MSM networks and connection to recent event(s) in Western Europe may explain the current outbreak. (13/n)
This is not very surprising as historical data suggest that MXP tends to spread very well within households with 9% secondary attack rate in unvaccinated populations. So, this does not only relate to sexual networks, close and prolonged contact is definitely an issue. (14/n)
Majority of the cases were not admitted to hospital & no deaths so far. This is reassuring and fits with historical data as the current outbreak is caused by the MXP West Africa clade, which has a CFR of 1- 3.6% (who.int/emergencies/di…\) (15/n)
This is the biggest outbreak outside of Africa, and there will be more cases to come. The concern is not necessarily a global pandemic like what we’ve seen w/ coronaviruses or influenza. But a growing & large MXP epidemic is a concern especially if PH measures are delayed. (16/n)
Especially given the apparent symptoms of MXP and transmission mostly after symptoms suggest that isolation + contact tracing can be very effective to control MPX. With the help from smallpox ring vaccination, I hope that it very much can be contained. (17/n)
However, the biggest challenge in my opinion is the delayed identification of cases, which may have profound implications not only on communities, but on healthcare workers, from risk of exposure or prolonged isolation, adding strains on healthcare systems during outbreaks.(18/n)
For instance, the case in Belgium was initially only tested for HSV & Syphilis. Upon international alerts was then tested for MXP. This is also due limited published literature on MXP due to the challenges faced by colleagues in global South (19/n)
So, the most important thing is to inform our communities & healthcare workers about the clinical presentation, incubation period, so that people can be diagnosed at an earlier possibility, isolated and contacts are protected. This is the range of skin lesions. (20/n)
In conclusion, #monkeypox is not really a rare disease & is a PH concern. According to prelim evidence there is no indication that current outbreak is due to a new MXP variant & epi data suggest that it’s been introduced to MSM networks, likely sometime in late-April. (21/n)
We have observed MXP outbreaks in many countries mainly in Africa, this is the first time that we are observing wide transmission in Europe. MXP remains an under-recognized and underreported emerging disease. Good clinical management can limit disease severity or death. (22/n)
We are in an unknown territory as individuals who have prior smallpox vaccination do have some degree of protection against monkeypox, but we don’t really know the degree of protection it provides to individuals who had vaccination 50, 60 years prior. (23/n)
For further reading, I will link some useful threads here in addition to the ones in my thread.
 
1- This thread by @JohnRossMD covers some clinical information from incubation period to clinical presentation. (24/n)
 
2- In this article & thread @edyong209 brilliantly covers the current MXP situation in detail with quotes from colleagues managing the current outbreak (25/n)
3- This is the Monkeypox contact tracing guidance by @UKHSA: classification of contacts and advice for vaccination and follow up. This guidance provides principles for risk assessment and follow up of contacts of confirmed monkeypox cases (26/n)
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
4- This thread by @tuliodna brings together 10 important papers if you want to learn more about MXP. (27/n)
I will update this thread as more data become available. But please remember that it doesn’t mean monkeypox is a gay disease and stigma has no place in outbreak response. A great article by @Boghuma et al.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Muge Cevik

Muge Cevik Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mugecevik

Apr 25
Late breaker session at #ECCMID2022 on acute hepatitis cases of unknown origin in children.
So far, 169 cases have been reported from 11 countries since first case was identified in 31 March. 17 have required liver transplant & at least one death has been reported. #IDTwitter
Almost all cases had high transaminases, majority of children have been hospitalised. No common exposure has been identified, no link to COVID19 vaccination. Adenovirus F41 was identified in several cases, but it doesn’t fully explain the clinical severity observed. #ECCMID2022
But there are still many uncertainties about acute hepatitis cases observed. Especially the # of cases, exact age group, clinical presentation, uncertain test results as not all cases were tested for adenovirus, risk factors and transmission routes remain unclear. #ECCMID2022
Read 15 tweets
Dec 15, 2021
Very interesting analyses about the virology of #Omicron, which may explain the faster spread of this variant.

According to a new lab study, Omicron infects & multiplies ~70x faster than the Delta variant and the wild type SARS-CoV-2 in the human bronchus, but not in the lung.
In this ex vivo study (press release), Michael Chan, Malik Peiris & John Nicholls et al. @hkumed show that at 24h after infection Omicron replicated ~70x faster than Delta in bronchus. Interestingly, it replicated ~10x less efficiently in the lung tissue. hkumed.hk/96b127/
Another analysis by @BalazsLab also supports these findings. In this lab study w/ pseudoviruses, Omicron showed greater ability to infect cells than other variants, which was ~ 4 times more infectious than the original strain, also more than Delta. medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 8 tweets
Dec 7, 2021
Important preliminary data from SA looking at whether vaccine elicited antibodies are still effective against #Omicron.

Good & bad news: There is a big drop in neutralisation activity, but it's partial & hybrid (vax + infection) holds fairly well. 🧵

This is a live virus neutralisation assay. Neutralisation studies can tell us whether levels of Ab in the blood (convalescent and vaccinated plasma) are high enough to prevent the virus from infecting cells in the lab.

.@sigallab & colleagues tested plasma from those who received vax only (orange) & those who had vax + previous infection (green) and showed a significant (~40x) decline in neutralisation activity, but this was not a complete escape & reduction was less in hybrid anti-sera.
Read 15 tweets
Dec 3, 2021
🦠 There’s a lot we don’t yet understand about Omicron, including its impact on immunity and what it means for vaccines. New data will be emerging over the next few wks, which could be misinterpreted w/o context. What we might expect & how to interpret the emerging data? 🧵(1/n)
1- Genomic data:
The biggest concern with omicron is that it contains >30 mutations in just the spike protein, the part which helps it enter human cells and the target for vaccines. This mutation profile is very different than other VOCs. (2/n) Image
There are plausible biological consequences of some of these mutations, but we don't really know the combined effect of all these mutations, so full significance of omicron is uncertain. (3/n) Image
Read 37 tweets
Aug 24, 2021
There is a lot of concern/confusion about vaccine effectiveness against the delta variant. How effective are the vaccines against Delta & how to interpret real-world observational data? So much misinformation is being circulated, so this thread brings key data together. 🧵(1/n)
Vaccine efficacy measures the relative reduction in infection/disease for the vaccinated vs unvaccinated arm. For instance, a vaccine that eliminates all risk would have an efficacy of 100%. Efficacy of 50% means you have a 50% reduced risk compared to an unvaxxed person. (2/n) Image
All studies assessing the performance of vaccines against Delta are based on real-world data (vaccine effectiveness), which are influenced by variant transmissibility, human behaviour, and immunity status of the population, therefore they require careful interpretation. (3/n) Image
Read 25 tweets
Feb 7, 2021
There is a lot of confusion about the efficacy of AstraZeneca/ChAdOx1 vaccine against COVID19 due to B.1.351 / 501Y.V2 - summarising the results of phase 1b/2a double-blind randomized trial conducted in South Africa (based on @GovernmentZA press conference).🧵(1/6)
Adults aged 18-65 years without severe comorbidities and HIV were recruited. It was designed to show >60% efficacy against symptomatic disease, but because only 2000 participants were recruited with 42 total events, this analysis was not statistically powered. (2/6) Image
In total, 1749 participants were recruited, the population enrolled was young and generally healthy; the prevalence of hypertension, respiratory disease, and diabetes was low. Therefore, it was not designed to assess efficacy against severe disease. (3/6) Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(