It will also signal the dramatic expansion of religious authority into far-flung corners of American life, as conservative Christians impose their moral ideas on the general public."
"Part of [Christians'] objection to the legalization of abortion was the way the court simply assumed that the US was a secular, civic republic.
Roe marked the culmination of a 10-year interrogation of the role of religious groups within American society" washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/0…
"Through these cases, the court rejected the stance of Christian religious groups...
By the time the court took up the question of abortion, religious conservatives had grown outraged that their moral positions received no consideration."
[I would say that Christians were outraged that their beliefs were not given SPECIAL consideration.
The justices did 'consider' Christian beliefs, as well as the beliefs of religions that approve of abortion.
But the justices didn't 'privilege' the Christian beliefs.]
"In deciding Roe, the court made its commitment to secularism explicit.
It had to.
The question of when human life began & the exact status of a fetus were essentially religious questions. Different religious groups took divergent positions on abortion." washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/0…
"Rather than deciding the precise status of an unviable fetus, it asked itself the question...
“Who should make judgments of that sort?”
An individual woman in consultation with her doctor was the only person charged with making those judgments."
"Here was a clear articulation of liberalism, which involved seeing women as capable of moral self-determination independent of religious leaders and even their families."
[Unfortunately, this idea that women should be allowed to make their own choices was immediately attacked.]
"Almost immediately after Roe, conservative religious groups, members of Congress and jurists began to back away from that idea [of female bodily autonomy]...
It was a win for conservative religious authorities seeking to influence policy."
liberals began to remind their conservative counterparts that, as Justice Harry Blackmun put it in 1986,
“The legitimacy of secular legislation depends … on whether the State can advance some justification for its law beyond its conformity to religious doctrine.”
"But conservatives instead became aggressively hostile to the ideal of secular legislation and to the notion that the state has any role in protecting the individual from religious groups."
If you can't afford a subscription (I highly recommend supporting good news orgs if you can afford it), here's a gift link, so you can read the entire article for yourself: wapo.st/3wFArts
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Rep. Elise Stefanik, the House Republican chairman who previously endorsed a version of that “great replacement theory,” recently doubled down on it, even after Buffalo. So apparently... the answer to that question is no."
"The [@ProjectLincoln] ad singles out three major companies — PricewaterhouseCoopers @PwC, Home Depot @HomeDepot and the Altria Group @AltriaNews — and rips them for donating to Stefanik.
"The study, released on Friday by ... a decades-old group that tracks right-wing extremism, found that more than 1 in 5 Republican state legislators in the United States were affiliated with far-right groups."
"And as the scale of what happened comes into sharper focus, the disaster appears to be breaking through the Kremlin’s tightly controlled information bubble."
"Russian battlefield failure is resonating w/ a stable of pro-Russian war bloggers...
“The commentary by these widely read milbloggers may fuel burgeoning doubts in Russia about Russia’s prospects in this war & the competence of Russia’s military leaders” nytimes.com/2022/05/15/wor…
"Russian command reportedly sent about 550 troops... to cross the Donets River at Bilohorivka...
Satellite images reveal that Ukrainian artillery destroyed several Russian pontoon bridges and laid waste to a tight concentration of Russian troops and equipment around the river."
"thanks to a paranoid, delusional and potentially violent new strain in our nation’s politics, Americans may not be able to count on future elections being conducted fairly — or the results of fair elections being accepted."
"Journalists often quote his incendiary language from the speech: “Fight like hell”; “We will not take it anymore.” But Trump also laid out a precise plan of action for the crowd:"
"Trump promised the crowd that if they did as he urged—if they marched on Congress, if they showed strength—they could force a change of the election result."
Jan. 6 White House logs given to House show 7-hour gap in Trump calls
The House select committee is investigating whether it has the full record and whether Trump communicated that day through backchannels, phones of aides or personal disposable phones
"Internal White House records from the day of the attack on the US Capitol... show a gap in Trump’s phone logs of seven hours and 37 minutes, including the period when the building was being violently assaulted"
"The seven-hour gap also stands in stark contrast to the extensive public reporting about phone conversations he [Trump] had with allies during the attack..."