Delhi High Court will continue to hear today the arguments in the appeal of former JNU student Umar Khalid challenging the lower court's order denying him bail in the Delhi Riots larger conspiracy case. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Khalid has been charged with criminal conspiracy and other provisions of the IPC along with the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). He has been in jail since October 2020. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
The appeal will be heard by a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar.
Matter is likely to be take up at 2:30pm.
Read the development in the previous hearing here: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Kumar: Please note that this witness does not call the location secret. There is no Sec 164 statement either. Please note that the CDR shows that Natasha Narwal was not at this location on that day.
Kumar: Sierra also did not say that Umar Khalid said, 'policewalon ka khoon bahan padega'. But the chargesheet makes this allegation without any proof.
J Bhatnagar: So they are corraborating each other?
Kumar: It is not as if they have their own version or language. The punctuation, the words and the manner in which they describe the incident are exactly identical.
J Bhatnagar: All this will be tested at trial.
Kumar: Your lordships just take a note of it and consider it while deciding my bail.
Kumar: Please note that Smith is the only person who says I was involved in accumulating weapons. But there is no recovery of any weapons from me. He does not even call the 23rd Jan speech provocative.
Kumar: Other than a bald statement there is neither any basis nor specificity to any of these allegations. Please also note that he says Gulfisha told him that Khalid has asked women to get acid or other things.
Kumar: There is a lot of hearsay. He says "public ko bhadkaya". But he doesn't mention, what were the words used, what was said. There is not a single witness who says they were induced particulalry at Umar Khalid's behest.
Kumar now refers to Sec 161 statement of another protected witness named Delta.
Kumar: Please note that there is not even an allegation that Khalid said 'Policewalon ka khoon bahaye". The chargesheet said this. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Please note that in his 161 he did not hear anything that Khalid had said to Gulfish Fatima. He does not refer tot he Seelampur meeting either. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Kumar: This is the witness who tells the magistrate that from Jan 5 he was constantly telling the local SHO what was happening, who was conducting the protests yet no action was taken. This was not in 161 statement. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Kumar: Delta is a witness who himself says that he has apprised SHO of everything including that Gulfisha asked local women to get knives and other things. Yet even he does not say that Khalid's speech was provocative. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Kumar now refers to the statement of another protected witness named Gamma.
Kumar: He does not talk about Khalid in 161 statement. But within six days, in 164 statement he says that Khalid gave a provocative speech. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Kumar: Please also note that the prosecution which has termed the meeting a 'secret meeting' got the photographs of the said meeting from the Facebook profile of one of the accused. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: If this is supposed to be a conspiracy why would a picture of me will be available on Facebook in August. I have been accused of being a silent whisper that I have learnt from my experience to stay under the radar.
Pais: They (Police) says that on August 28 it was learnt that a secret meeting was held. Please see that the statement of Delta was on 13 April. Echo was on April 16. The list is endless. the manner in which chargesheet is presented shows that it is a fabrication.
Pais: Does the court jump to conclusion that it was a conspitorial meeting because the prosecution said so and ignores the statements of the witnesses which did not say it was a secret meeting. Nothing has been discussed.
Pais: The order only reproduced the statements of the witness. It did not even discuss how it constitutes an offence under Section 15 of UAPA. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais now refers to 14th instance alleged against Khalid.
Pais: The date of the instance is Feb 10, 2020 and the witnesses are Illium and Crypton. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: There is a political party called Welfare Party of India. They organised a protest at Jantar Mantar and it is alleged that Bangladeshi women were taken to the site. That's it. Nothing else. i would be wasting your lordships time if I read this statement.
Pais: I am not asking you to discard the statements. Weightage, veracity and reliability of a statement is your lordship's domain at the stage of granting bail.
J Mridul: We are not requried to look at epithets like secret meeting. We are to look at whether this meeting took place or not. Just because you put the picture of the meeting on facebook does not mean there was no meeting. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
J Mridul: The question is does all the statements and evidence taken together constitute commission of an offence prima facie. That's all that we have to decide. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: The chargesheet goes way beyond the statements.
J Mridul: The point is whatever statements are made, how much scrutiny can they be subject to at this stage? #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
J Mridul: Another issue is you are not taking into consideration that you have been chargesheeted for conspiracy as well. So to say that other materials in chargesheet does not concern you is not correct. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: We have not only read what is against, we have also read what is supposedly on my behest.
J Mridul: It may not be at your behest. The law is you are liable to what other co-accused have done as well. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais says the allegations are in reference to the speech at Amravati.
J Mridul: Just because the speech is in bad taste does not mean it is a terrorist act. Offensive and distasteful it was.
Pais: Okay, I will not refer to that speech.
Pais now refers to statement of another witness named James.
Pais now refers to another witness named Bond.
Court asks Delhi Police's counsel: Mr Prasad were these names picked out of a hat. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: The statement is not wrt to me but to three other persons. One of them has not been charged. He has given three statements and in each case he improves his statement. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: the last instance against me what chargesheet calls a 'flurry of calls'. There is no witness statement. Please have this in mind. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: To come to such a conclusion that mere exchange of phone calls constitute a conspiracy have they said that they spoke for so much time. Please have Navjot Sandhu judgment. It deal exactly with this. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: This judgment is under POTA. They (Police) are not telling you how much they spoke on previous days. This is just an inference. Also in this flurry there are only two calls of me in three hours. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
J Mridul: What proposition of law does it law down? It's just a elaboration of facts in that case. It does not lay down a law. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
Pais: Okay, I will leave it at that but this was the case that came closes to me.
J Mridul: All these judgments are at end of the trial.
Pais: The reason why they term these calls a conspiracy is...
J Mridul: How longer will you take?
Pais: I will finish the fact today and take 40 minutes tomorrow to finish the case law.
J Mridul: The difficulty is that this matter has taken more time than we envisaged. You now only want to take us through judgment. The thing is we will not be able to complete it before vacation. We will have to have it after reopening.
J Mridul: It is not possible for us to do this every day in the post lunch session. We have been hearing it almost on a daily basis for days.
J Mridul: We know you are in custody for a long time but so are others. people have been in preventive detention and their habeas corpus petitions are lying. #DelhiHighCourt#UmarKhalid#DelhiRiots#UAPA
#SupremeCourt hears appeal by Chhattisgarh Govt against HC order granting #bail to suspended Indian Police Service (IPS) officer GP Singh who was arrested in connection with a disproportionate assets case
Justice Gavai: Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi states that Singh has indulged in tampering of evidence and HC has ignored it. This present application is nothing but a totally unwarranted exercise by the state
Justice Gavai: While considering bail HC does not have business to deal with status of applicant and it is about the individual right. In Disproportionate assets case most is documentary evidence where there is no chance of tampering.
#SupremeCourt hears the plea by State of Andhra Pradesh against an order of the National Green Tribunal which halted the construction works at #Rushikonda Hills in Visakhapattanam as part of a tourism project
Dr AM Singhvi, Sr Adv: This is a prestigious project being constructed by State of AP. Only on the basis of a letter NGT constitutes a committee and that committee ex parte looks into it and says there is no environmental degradation or violation
Singhvi: Please see the committee report that there was no violation. Again a new committee was constituted to see if CRZ permissions were intact. This is for the resort which is ours which we are only demolishing and building again.
#SupremeCourt hears the appeal against Delhi HC order which aside the Pharmacy Council of India's (PCI) 2019 decision of imposing a moratorium on opening of new pharmacy colleges in India for a period of five years beginning from the academic year 2020-2021
Justice BR Gavai: Nowadays education is a industry and there are only lot of business houses. Looking at the cost of medical education students were required to go to..
Justice Hima Kohli: Ukraine,
Justice Gavai: yes Ukraine
SG Tushar Mehta: This is pharmacy milords
Justice Kohli: Processing will continue but don't do anything final..
SG: There are 2,500 colleges. This was brought in due to mushrooming colleges being run like shopping centres
Supreme Court to have fully physical hearing today owing to the internet server being down due to yesterday's maelstrom. Broadcast on Supreme Court app and via links to not work for today #PhysicalHearing#SupremeCourt
An entire NIC team is working round the clock to restore internet services considering a number of counsels are appearing via video conferencing #supremecourt#maelstrom
As per sources, the NIC was given a deadline of 10 am to restore #internet services in the #SupremeCourt
Varanasi District Magistrate Court hears an urgent application from Hindu side seeking the handover of the #GyanvapiSurvey report including photos and videos
Adv Hari Shankar Jain: Media ko jawab dena padhta hai. Report toh sab padh chuke hai , koi secret nahi hai
Adv Jain: (Everyone has read the report. Nothing is a secret. We have to answer to media also)
District Judge AK Vishvesha : report sirf bhai chara ke liye gupt hai, bhai chara bana rahe, shanti rahe (#GyanvapiSurvey report is under wraps for communal harmony. Lets maintain it)
Delhi High Court to shortly begin hearing PIL filed by AAP MLA Saurabh Bhardwaj seeking inquiry by special investigation team into the alleged attack on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's house.