GMWatch Profile picture
May 30 5 tweets 3 min read
Health and environmental groups raise alarm as EU Chemicals Agency fails to classify glyphosate as a human carcinogen gmwatch.org/en/106-news/la… Some of the world’s leading independent scientists have made the link between #glyphosate and cancer but ECHA refuses to do so
“Unfortunately, it's not the 1st time ECHA has failed to transparently and clearly justify its dismissal of independent scientific evidence. That’s incredibly worrying given the EU’s commitment & duty to protect its citizens & the environment from the most hazardous substances.”
Unlike ECHA, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, the gold standard for cancer research, finds #glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen. It has also been linked to adverse effects on human development, reproduction and hormonal systems.
ECHA’s opinion is a foundational step in the renewal process for 15 more years of #glyphosate!! This excellent @eoin thread explains how ECHA & other EU agencies rely on shoddy industry-funded genotoxicity studies that experts say are dangerously deficient
@eoin Some of the experts speaking at this webinar observed ECHA meetings on #glyphosate and are familiar with how it evaluates studies. They found major incoherencies in its evaluation of the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity potential of glyphosate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GMWatch

GMWatch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GMWatch

May 31
UK Gene-Editing Bill Raises Animal Welfare Concerns theepochtimes.com/uk-gene-editin… Experts warn that, contrary to the hype, the technology is imprecise and will open the door to the “wild west” of genetics. #GMOs
“It’s not precise, so the term ‘precision breeding’ is a complete misnomer. In addition to any intended genetic modification you invariably have large numbers of unintended alterations to the organism.” These could include the production of toxins and allergens in plants or crops
“It’s a ‘wild west’ of gene-editing of crops, plants and animals and even bacteria that are going to be released into the environment in an uncontrolled way,” says Dr Michael Antoniou, lead geneticist in gene expression and therapy at King’s College London. #GMOs
Read 5 tweets
May 29
Food experts slam the BBC for 'lies' about gene-edited foods thenational.scot/news/20173456.… If you can’t open, try here
archive.ph/nZckK #GMOs
The BBC and other media have been accused of “repeating uncritically and ad nauseam” UK Government “lies” about genetically edited foods. “They’re literally ripping up the rulebook on all types of genetic ­modification procedures & being completely dishonest to the science.” #GMO
Dr Michael Antoniou, a ­genetics expert from the King’s College London School of Medicine, said claims gene editing didn't involve genes from other species “misrepresented” the facts. “Under the new bill, the insertion of foreign DNA is part and parcel of the deregulation.” #GMOs
Read 11 tweets
Apr 24
New impacts of glyphosate:
Silvia Ribeiro of @ETC_Group summarises the latest scientific studies confirming the damaging impact of #glyphosate on human, animal and plant health caused via harmful imbalances in the digestive & immune systems jornada.com.mx/2022/04/23/opi… (Spanish text) Image
@ETC_Group It's not just cancer. A Canadian study published in 2022 studies the association of neurological and psychiatric diseases with the disruption of the intestinal flora in humans due to #glyphosate, a disruption that would also have intergenerational impacts frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
@ETC_Group On top of the known effects of hormonal disruption, new study shows the presence of glyphosate residues and/or its metabolites in post-menopausal women is associated with DNA methylation, a molecular alteration that can cause cancer & accelerate cell aging ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EH…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 2
100% of members of UK govt's #GMO advisory body have potential or actual conflicts of interest—List of interests reads like a Who's Who of the British biotech industry! gmwatch.org/en/106-news/la… Image
All members of ACRE have COIs that may enable them to benefit from any weakening of the regs around GMOs + in spite of ACRE's role in regulating environmental releases of #GMOs, only 1 of ACRE's panel has expertise in ecology and none seem to have ANY in environmental toxicology. Image
Get this! Jim Dunwell, the chair of this "independent" #GMO advisory body to the UK govt, was a founding member of the biotech industry-funded lobby group CropGen that says its mission is "to make the case for GM crops and foods." He also gets a pension from GMO giant Syngenta.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 10
This @chicagotribune editorial bends over backwards to say #GMOs are fab (claiming they do all kinds of things they've never managed, and that they've been eaten safely "for generations"!!) in the course of saying USDA's new #GMO labeling is a pile of💩 chicagotribune.com/opinion/editor…
@chicagotribune A straightforward mandate to better inform the public has been turned into a complicated decision tree only a bureaucrat could love. The govt has replaced the commonly used terms “genetically modified” & #GMO. Instead, food manufacturers are required to use “bioengineered” or BE.
@chicagotribune The USDA's “bioengineered” or BE labels are supposed to disclose ingredients “derived from biotechnology” or “ingredients derived from a bioengineered source.” Yet refined products can dodge ANY disclosure via "a loophole you could drive a tractor through", says @chicagotribune
Read 4 tweets
Oct 31, 2021
New book on #COVID-19 origins was plagued by censorship; concludes "overwhelming" evidence that virus was genetically engineered lab escape gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Image
Our review includes exclusive interviews with two of the authors, investigative journalist Paolo Barnard and Prof Angus Dalgleish, about their experiences of censorship over #COVID19 & the lab origin theory, and how that played out in relation to their new book. ImageImage
Paolo B. says when he was looking for scientist co-authors for the book they told him "dissent in writing is career-threatening" and "just be aware Fauci & NIH is a no-go area for this book. My total funding for the last 15 years has been from NIH and similarly into the future.." Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(