🧵With (some) Tory MPs finally acting against their corrupt sham of a PM*, it would be great to see current and former politicians of all allegiances joining @99Organisation.
🏘️Many politicians want to improve their communities
🧒& invest wisely in the future so today's children have a better life
💷& end mass impoverishment
😡Our increasingly polarising, vitriolic & corrupt Cabinet is good for almost no-one.
🚨It's very bad for 99% of us.
(2/)
👩⚖️Johnson is the first serving PM to be found guilty of a criminal offence
🗑️He won't resign
🪧Our democratic rights are vanishing
🥣Most of us are getting poorer (largely due to Brexit & Govt bungling, compounded by COVID & war in Ukraine)
🪙 While Govt friends get richer
(3/)
At @99Organisation we want to end mass impoverishment via 5 key actions:
🎯Democratic reset to force Governments to look after the 99%
🎯Fact-based policy-making
🎯Policy to end mass impoverishment
🎯Invest wisely in the future
🎯Clean up capitalism
(4/)
Our values:
👉We are inclusive
👉We are peaceful
👉We are fact-based
👉We want to tackle the argument, not the person
(5/)
❗️We want to unite people alarmed by the direction of travel #Johnson & his cronies are taking us in #DemocracyUnderThreat#CostOfLivingCrisis#ToryCorruption#Lies
📄We have fact-sheets politicians of all stripes (who agree with the above) can use
💪We run projects you can join
“[Johnson] is showing signs of being extremely impatient in regard to the constitutional constraints upon him. He gets angry if the courts or parliament try to interfere...'
- adding this clause: 1.7 Where the PM determines that a breach of the expected standards has occurred, he may ask the Independent Adviser for confidential advice on the appropriate sanction. The
final decision rests with the PM...
...Where the PM retains his confidence in the Minister, available sanctions include requiring some form of public apology, remedial action, or removal of ministerial salary for a period.
Now, Johnson alone decides the fate of any minister, including himself 🚨🚨🚨
Thank you for your letter dated 27th April, wherein you stated that 'there is currently no evidence' [that the PM misled the House of Commons], and that a vote of no confidence...
...'would [not] be helpful in advance of the Met Police completing their investigations and the release of Sue Gray's full report'. Now that the Met have completed their investigation & the report has been released, I am keen to hear how you intend to proceed.
We have irrefutable evidence that Boris Johnson lied to the House (in January & on 29th March). Johnson stated that he had been 'repeatedly assured...that there was no party...and that no rules were broken.' His statement was demonstrably untrue...