@CathyYoung63 That’s fair, esp. if (as in your case) folks who call themselves libs blocked low-income housing. But plenty of what people derisively call NIMBY-ism is skepticism about what I’d call blind YIMBY-ism. IMHO YIMBY-ism often represents blind faith in—and giveaways to—developers. /1
@CathyYoung63 Eg, I’m deeply skeptical #Minneapolis2040 will just lead to more condos for Laptop Class millennials, not low-income housing, unless property values drop substantially—which would destroy the nest eggs of suburb-raised libs who helped revitalized cities by back in in the 90s. /2
@CathyYoung63 Also, I’ve both rented and owned, & IHMO rental units often are poorly tended—which again hurts nest eggs. So while I support actual low-income housing, I’d prefer to see it dispersed fairly throughout neighborhoods, not concentrated. So maybe I’m a Sometimes NIMBY…SNIMBY?! /3
@CathyYoung63 PS — Marin County is IMHO one of the most beautiful places in the US—one of my favorites places to visit. I live in Houston, which I am fond of but I is mostly a terribly ugly place to live. So I am deeply sympathetic to people who live in Marin and want to keep in beautiful. /3
@CathyYoung63 And I have little sympathy for those who cannot afford to live in the city of their choice. I moved here from places I could not afford. IMHO the way forward through the housing crisis is not to make it affordable for everyone, but for people who cannot afford it to leave. /4
@CathyYoung63 Obviously, for actual homeless or impoverished people, that will require serious subsidies—which I’d support. But massively increasing density in the most desirable cities won’t make them better. It will make them less desirable—and we’ll all be worse off as a result. My $.02! /5
@CathyYoung63 Coda: Perhaps ironically, all my NIMBY-ism relates to areas (Marin, Minneapolis, etc.) I visit often but where I don’t actually own property. I live just outside of the #HoustonHeights historic district, so there are no limits on building around my house. In the past decade… 6
@CathyYoung63 over 50 single-family houses have been built in a three block area on my own street, often tearing down historic bungalows (but also factories—no zoning here!). Directly across the street, a house went up last year, another is going up now, and two more are about to start. So…/7
@CathyYoung63 I guess maybe my feelings stem a little from the fact that I LIVE amongst INSANE rapid building (and have for a decade) and—while I’ve done nothing to stop it—perhaps I’m just sick of it! Built baby build is noisy and dusty for the neighbors, let me tell you!! :) /8
@CathyYoung63 Finally, I value connection to a place, so while I have zero sympathy for mobile elites who cannot find homes at the hip cities to which they swarm (or to migrant homeless folks), I absolutely believe in building more housing for WC locals who are priced out by gentrification. /9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is beautifully ironic that @DavidOBowles’s hit job on @jeaninecummins’s #AmericanDirt—in which he criticizes her book for cultural appropriation and poor Spanish dialogue—uses “Latinx” to refer to people from Latin America. nytimes.com/2020/01/27/opi… While Bowles is no doubt… /1
…a well-regarded Mexican-American author and translator w/the expertise to criticize Cummins’s work on the merits, it’s hard to take his complaints of “white saviorism” + bad Spanish seriously when he offers no evidence of it and himself uses a term almost no Hispanics use…/2
…to describe themselves. thinknow.com/blog/the-great… I sincerely doubt many of Bowles’s Latino/a neighbors in the Valley use "Latinx," regardless of their education, income or immigration status; at least that’s my experience here. Indeed, some Latinos view “Latinx” as itself…. /3
@EliseStefanik@DevinNunes@ewarren During the Jeff Sessions confirmation hearings, after reading a letter from #Coretta Scott King, Warren was gaveled out of order on the grounds that she’d impugned a fellow Senator. This took Warren by surprise b/c the letter had previously been entered into the Senate record. /2
Was the famous #AlfredEisenstaedt photo of the sailor kissing a woman who appeared to be a nurse, in #TimesSquare, on #VJDay, a #sexualassault? Contrary to accepted wisdom of the #MeToo crowd (whose goals I support, but whose excesses I deplore), probably not. Here's why: /1
First, it’s not clear who is in the photo. Is it #GretaZimmer or #EdithShain? #GeorgeMendonsa or #CarlMuscarello? Or one of the many other men who claimed to be kisser or women who claimed to be the kissee? It matters, because, absent a victim, there is no sexual assault. /2
Absent testimony, the law does not assume a man touching a woman on a photo is touching her sexually without her consent simply based on body language. It is one thing to #BelieveWomen women's stories, but quite another to PRESUME no consent. Luckily, that is not the law. /3