Tonight’s ECtHR intervention is a measure granted only exceptionally where there’s a “real risk of irreversible harm”.
That no removal should take place until 3 weeks after the final domestic decision is the common sense this govt so often mentions in the human rights context.
On a day when the UK Prime Minister’s attacks on lawyers have led the leaders of the profession to issue a strong statement, where Johnson has unleashed at least a question mark over the ECHR itself, this is a confrontation his govt has brought on itself - perhaps foreseeably.
Where culture war meets Brexit goals, this is the day after the govt claims preservation of the Good Friday Agreement forms part of a barely plausible justification for its #NIProtocol Bill.
Meanwhile,the GFA expressly preserves the ECHR, & direct enforceability, as a safeguard.
Just to add to the collision course the govt appears to have wilfully embarked upon, the UK is locked into human rights protection & ECHR commitment as part of the Brexit TCA (Trade & Cooperation Agreement). If the UK withdraws, it loses cooperation on law enforcement & security.
Not only does the govt’s point of “principle” now look unlikely to go ahead, it has tied itself in knots. How many international treaties will the govt tear up in our name?
Not convinced this has been thought through beyond gut campaign mode. At the cost of the most vulnerable.
With huge thanks & admiration for the civil society, legal teams & their clients who pursued this result to try to stop the “real risk of irreversible harm”.
Credit to @ECHR_CEDH who acted with all due haste.
Seems an appropriate moment to highlight what the leaders of the legal profession said today in response to the Prime Minister’s dangerous attacks on lawyers.
Not long ago, we saw shocking headlines about judges as “enemies of the people”. We must not be pulled back there again.
I can only hope - though unrealistically - that this important point about what the govt is telling Strasbourg - that we aren’t leaving the ECHR - is emphasised tmw.
The chaos may be intended, but the consequences may not be. We are being forced into constant crisis mode.
This powerful piece by @Lees_Martina reconstructs the horrifying tragedy of Grenfell & explains why, 5 years on, 640k people still live in flammable flats & up to 4.2million are trapped in #claddingscandal created by govt failures, corporate wrongdoing & regulatory incompetence.
When you read the painful details of the multiple failures which led to tragedy of Grenfell, & when you have personally experienced the fallout as millions of us have, it’s been very hard to believe that we live in a country, properly regulated, that values people over profits.
I want to thank those journalists who have kept asking questions, supporting Grenfell families who still wait for justice, & those millions trapped in the #claddingscandal. Without you, this would have vanished from public sight, esp @PeteApps@insidehousing@Lees_Martina.
Part of an important thread which shows why the highest level urgent intervention by the Brazilian authorities is needed. The terrain, the drug trafficking routes & illegal mining make this an operation fraught with danger & difficulty.
If you haven’t read any of @domphillips excellent environmental journalism over the last decade or so, this is as good as any to understand his valuable work.
A sobering reminder of the intolerable threats journalists face globally.
Imagine having faced the unimaginable in Afghanistan last summer, as Britain failed its allies, making it here & being faced with this flimsy document. In English. No translation. Almost no legal help.
Reflecting on what “bearing responsibility” means for a Minister after Sue Gray report & @CommonsForeign on #Afghanistan.
Accountability in Government appears to hold less consequence than for a CEO, employee or worker, despite its consequence for people, policy & constitution.
If the PM can ‘misrepresent’ at leisure (often using wild language as he did yesterday moments before & after professing contrition) & the Speaker does nothing to regulate that - other than a policing of very specific words - Parliament is quaint but not functioning in its role.
Here is @prospect_clark with a thought experiment on how the constitution crumbles as a Prime Minister plays for time, “caught out speaking outright untruths at the despatch box—and failed, too, to correct them as soon he could have done.” prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/cava-…
Absolutely damning report from @CommonsForeign on UK’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, fiercely critical of Raab & senior leaders “on holiday when Kabul fell mark[ing] a fundamental lack of seriousness, grip or leadership at a time of national emergency.”
Some of the harshest findings I’ve seen directed at a Minister, reflecting what many of us working on this saw.
“…no clear line of command within the political leadership of the Govt as decisions were made on the basis of untraceable & unaccountable political interventions.”
Chaired by @TomTugendhat, it focused on the lack of coordination between 3 govt departments, noting consequences for current foreign policy. The crisis “required clear decision-making, strong political leadership & tight coordination. We have seen little evidence of this.”