They’ve applied a public interest test about releasing the info now versus some undetermined time in the future (this is a real flaw with section 22 – they don’t have to say when it will be published).
They say there's a ‘public interest in cost effectiveness’ & allowing govt to deal with the necessary ‘preparation, administration & context of publication’.
We’re talking about a short Word doc published as a PDF.
We should be worried if that much prep is needed.
Bonus: I also asked for info about PPSs. A month and a half after they published the latest list, they told me it’s been published. (I’d already spotted it anyway.)
But it’s not for the dates I requested. That info is *not* available on GOV.UK.
There’s also no link between the various PPS lists, even though GOV.UK has a ‘Collection’ function (published ones are here, fyi: gov.uk/search/all?key…)
This is still better than what they do for Cabinet Committees (when they actually publish the information), which is to overwrite the previous list, so you can’t find previous lists on GOV.UK: gov.uk/government/pub…
The whole episode shows that the 'default closed' mindset still persists in parts of govt. It also shows govt's mgmt of information is still sorely lacking in 2022.
Needless to say I'll be appealing, but the whole thing has been a farce.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In short, it’s ‘the ability to think critically about data in different contexts and examine the impact of different approaches when collecting, using and sharing data and information’, rather than the technical skills required in working with data
I’ve been looking at what various government documents say about data literacy (& those more technical data skills).
Strategy has 4 pillars:
- foundations (standards, ensuring data is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable)
- skills
- availability (better coordination and sharing)
- responsibility (lawful, secure, fair, ethical, sustainable and accountable use)
=> 5 priority missions
I'll do the traditional thinktank thing of noting IfG recommendations that have ended up in the Nat'l Data Strategy.
These include appointing a chief data officer (though long-promised, no timeframe) & an audit of data inventories - good to know what data depts actually have 👍
We were a bit more open than most to data policy moving to DCMS in 2018.
Political energy had gone out of the agenda at Cabinet Office, DCMS had a Sec of State (Matt Hancock) who was clearly interested in it.
He was reshuffled to health 3 months later.
But there were clearly going to be challenges:
- DCMS had a wide-ranging & expanding brief
- Data was - & remains - fragmented across Whitehall
- DCMS not a traditional 'central' dept, not clear it had right skills/capabilities at the time
Organograms aren’t most obvious data thing to get pulses racing. Hardly AI, blockchain (#buzzword), Citymapper etc.
Part of Cameron’s May 2010 pledges (bit.ly/2LXhdqE) to open up data, they include names, salaries, professions, jobs of civil servants & units w/in depts
Maude called them ‘the most comprehensive organisation charts of the UK civil service ever released online’ bit.ly/2uVd28k. Not the flashiest or sexiest datasets, but mgmt info vital both for effectiveness (understanding your workforce) and accountability.