Doug Parr Profile picture
Jun 25 10 tweets 3 min read
Prime Minister Johnson has just signalled that the UK electricity market is about to undergo the biggest shake up since privatisation over 30 years ago. This will be a major test of their ability to do the right thing whilst keeping the show on the road 🧵
On @BBCr4today just now Johnson said one of the things to tackle cost-of-living crisis was to stop the ‘crazy’ situation that all electricity is paid for at the marginal gas price i.e. it’s all paid for at the price of the most expensive that fulfils UK demand at that moment
Interview here from around 8.10
bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
Johnson is right – the system was set up in 1990 when the only things competing were different forms of fossil fuel generation. Nobody then (nor, in fairness, even in 2010) foresaw cheap renewable power. But because of the pricing system the public do not get that benefit
One idea is to have 2 markets, as suggested by @MichaelGrubb9 where most electricity is bought from the low carbon market, with full pass-through of the cheaper #renewables prices, then topped up from a second, more expensive fossil power gen market
For a Prime Minister like Johnson, who is famously not a ‘details’ man, to be quoting this change in a high-profile BBC interview shows he is aware of the issue and that conversations are live in No10 about changing it
There’s an Energy Bill coming to Parliament, possibly as early as next month, and on the basis of this interview as well as other noises around Westminster, I’d suggest there will be legislation to make such a change to the electricity market
This might all seem a bit geeky (and it is), but one impact of the change will be to make cheap #Renewables more attractive to the suppliers of electricity to customers than fossil power, leading to economic pressure for more RE construction. Good news
But warning!!! UK, and many other countries, are trying to deliver major investment e.g. growing from around 11GW offshore wind to 50GW over the next 8 years

Many 10s of billions of ££ will be required. And….
The *details* of what the market structure is going to look like will affect investment decisions.

Yet the investment pipeline needs to be maintained alongside these much needed market reform, a tricky balancing act which I hope current govt is up to

ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doug Parr

Doug Parr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doug_parr

Feb 4
Who are these f***ing imbeciles in UK govt cabinet who think "the pace of the planned switch to renewable energy is too fast" ??

Have they not being paying attention to energy costs for the last decade?

Renewables now cheaper than anything else
THREAD

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/…
There are a few other idiocies in there which make one realise how disconnected our 'leaders' are

UK 2050 net zero target WAS one of the most aggressive in the world. Not any more. It's the direction the world is now travelling

Get with it or get left behind
And another one

Yes we've stigmatised gas. Have they noticed there's a gas price crisis. GAS price crisis. The clue is in the name
Read 5 tweets
Nov 12, 2021
1/5 🧵 on subsidies

New draft text at #COP26 (1/CMA.3 in the jargon) mentions phasing out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies”

This has weasel word’ inefficient’ but that’s still a step forward, right? Right?

(many thanks to @kaisakosonen for help)

unfccc.int/sites/default/… Image
2/5
Not so fast. The phrase “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies” has history.

It’s not the first time it has appeared in international agreements

Back in 2009, the G20 used it too (see text here)

oecd.org/g20/summits/pi… Image
3/5
Not many fossil fuel subsidies, inefficient or otherwise, have been phased out since then

Indeed OECD admitted they’d not made any progress on subsidies at their recent stocktake in July this year - subsidies just 2% lower than in 2009

oecd.org/fossil-fuels/p… Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 7, 2021
OK so we're going to have to talk about UK government's increasingly irrational obsession with #nuclear power again. Sigh

It matters because nuclear is now an *obstacle* to delivering rapid emissions cuts in UK

If that sounds wrong or weird, read on
ft.com/content/d115c0…
First there are perfectly good reasons for not liking nuclear power. Link to nuclear weapons. Possible catastrophic accident.

And nuclear waste, for which no deliverable solution exists, even though the problems were flagged up *60 years ago*

greenpeace.org/static/planet4…
And having nuclear power, even in a developed nation like UK is a *choice* not a necessity for decarbonisation

Recent work by Imperial College says new nuclear is not on the cost effective pathway to rapid decarb of the electricity sector

spiral.imperial.ac.uk:8443/bitstream/1004…
Read 13 tweets
Apr 20, 2021
New targets from UK government on climate change - promising 78% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2035

What does it mean?

A thread on first thoughts
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
First - it’s great news the commitment is there.

There'll be criticism from many (incl me) who say you need to match targets with action

But the target is now there, it will go into law. It's better to have a stretch target than not. So it’s excellent it is
First, the international implications

Timing is designed to maximise impact on the international community given the Biden summit starting Thurs

UK is now a small player, and it's hard to measure impact, but 78% cut is eye-catching, creates momentum

nytimes.com/2021/04/13/cli…
Read 14 tweets
Mar 5, 2021
I'm getting pretty fed up with uk govt rejections of criticism by making up any old shit as their response. Either it has no grasp of the issues, or is trolling the british people

THREAD 1/6
2/6
Exhibit A: Cumbria Coal mine

A new coal mine is a 'local issue'

Presumably China's coal use is a 'local issue' too?

Obvious nonsense

bbc.co.uk/news/science-e… Image
3/6
Exhibit B: Green Homes Grant

Govt blamed failures - and subsequent cuts of £1bn to budget - on lack of demand

Their **own** figures said about 70,000 people applied, 2,777 people had got anything installed

theguardian.com/environment/20… Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 19, 2020
I’ve been resisting the urge to comment on the Johnson 10 point plan until I thought I knew what was in it

So I avoided a hot take

Sorry, that's not very Twitter of me I realise

Here’s some thoughts

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Overall plan delivers 181MtC cuts to 2030 & £3 bn new investment from govt.

Neither is enough on its own to tackle the UK contribution to the climate emergency

And, for example, compare £16bn announced today for defence



Claim plan will deliver around £29bn private investment by 2030 should not be ignored

But still that’s a substantial shortfall given investment level will need to be of order of £30bn per yr from now

What will be in Spending Review & National Infra Strategy? Needs big uplift
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(