GET A GRIP Profile picture
Jun 28, 2022 14 tweets 7 min read Read on X
#THREAD

Well there's some very interesting & innovative attempts to clarify Priti Patel's new laws around #protest in the 'Noise-related provisions: Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Act 2022 #factsheet'.

#PoliceBill📢😬

gov.uk/government/pub…
The Act allows police to place conditions on public processions, public assemblies & one-person protests where it is reasonably believed that the noise they generated "may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation carried on in the vicinity...
...or have a significant impact on people in the vicinity of the protest."

Priti Patel also "has a power, by regulations, to further define the meaning of 'serious disruption' & provide further clarity to police in the use of these powers."

Clear as mud. ImageImage
"Recent months have shown that certain tactics employed by some protestors have had a hugely detrimental effect on the hardworking majority seeking to go about their daily lives."

"Hardworking majority" is a cliché used in the Telegraph/Sun/Mail, & party political broadcasts. ImageImageImage
"These powers do not silence protestors or curb freedom of expression."

This - like so much that Priti Patel, Boris Johnson & other Government cabinet members & foreign/non-dom billionaire-owned newspapers claim - is obviously a straightforward lie. Image
"The power to set noise-related conditions will only be used in the most exceptional of circumstances, where police assess the noise from protests to be unjustifiable & damaging to others."

I'm no expert, but "damaging" & "unjustifiable" seems pretty subjective concepts to me.
4.2 Will these measures ban protests for being too noisy?

"No, the police will only be able to impose conditions on unjustifiably noisy protests that may have a significant impact on others or may seriously disrupt the activities of an organisation."

Here, "no" means "YES". 😬
"The threshold for being able to impose conditions on noisy protests is appropriately high. The police will only use it in case where it is deemed necessary & proportionate."

The old "necessary & proportionate" as used with stop & search & use of force (whenever "reasonable").😬 ImageImage
4.3 Will these measures stop protestors from expressing their views?

"Absolutely not." *cough* "This measure has nothing to do with the content of the noise generated by a protest, just the level of the noise."

Rules around precise noise levels & proximity to source are absent. Image
4.4 Why target one-person protests?

"This particular measure only relates to the noise generated from a single-person protest & does not introduce any other situations in which police can place conditions on single-person protests."

That's ok then. 😬

4.5 What kind of scenarios could police impose noise-related conditions in?

Hypothetical scenarios include:

"a noisy protest in a town centre may not meet the threshold, but a protest creating the same amount of noise outside a school might."
"a noisy protest outside an office with double glazing may not meet the threshold, but a protest creating the same amount of noise outside a small GP surgery, or small street-level businesses might."

So organise protests outside double-glazed buildings? 😬
4.6 How often do the police impose conditions on protests?

"Data from the National Police Chiefs’ Council suggests that, out of over 2500 protests between 21 January & 21 April 2021, the police imposed conditions no more than a dozen times."

I feel a new record coming on! Image
So there we have it:

Clear as mud for both protesters & police

Police decide what is "justifiable" noise

Almost totally subjective as noise levels aren't specified

Priti Patel now has the freedom "to further define the meaning of serious disruption." 😬

(Pic: @coldwarsteve). Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

Apr 22
🧵

Two Priests, who both smoke, go the Pope.

The first asks "Is it OK to smoke while I'm praying?"

The Pope replies "No! You should be focused on God!"

The second Priest asks "Is it OK to pray while I'm smoking?"

The Pope replies "Of course, there's never a bad time to pray" Image
Nigel Farage’s rhetorical technique of framing controversial or inflammatory statements as questions, often defended as “just asking questions,” is a well-documented strategy - sometimes called “JAQing off” in online discourse - that has drawn significant criticism. Image
This approach involves posing questions to imply a controversial viewpoint without explicitly endorsing it, thereby maintaining plausible deniability. Farage often uses this strategy to raise issues around immigration, national identity, and 'wokeness' or 'political correctness'. Image
Read 36 tweets
Apr 18
🧵

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was a response to the atrocities of WWII and the Holocaust, designed to prevent such horrors reoccurring.

Withdrawing risks weakening human rights, international isolation, destabilised peace agreements, and authoritarian drift. Image
Adopted in 1950 by the Council of Europe, the ECHR was a collective response to the Holocaust, during which about 11 million people, including 6 million Jews, were systematically exterminated, exposing the urgent need for a legal framework to prevent such horrors from recurring.
The Council of Europe, established in 1949 to promote democracy, rule of law, and human rights, made the ECHR a cornerstone of its mission.

Influenced by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the ECHR ensured states uphold fundamental rights.
Read 33 tweets
Apr 17
🧵

Comparing political rhetoric across eras is a sensitive task, as context, intent, and historical outcomes differ vastly.

In 1990, Ivana Trump said her husband Donald owned a copy of “My New Order” – a printed collection of Hitler's speeches – which he kept by the bedside... Image
Some of Trump’s statements have been noted by historians, critics, and media for echoing themes or phrasing used by Adolf Hitler, particularly in their dehumanizing language, scapegoating of groups, and authoritarian undertones.

Below, with @grok's help, I’ll provide examples of Trump’s quotes that have been cited as resembling Hitler’s rhetoric, alongside Hitler’s statements for comparison, drawing from credible sources, focusing on specific language & themes, ensuring accuracy, & avoiding exaggeration. Image
Read 20 tweets
Apr 17
🧵

Most people know very little about Trump's new best friend, El Salvador’s strongman leader, Nayib Bukele, who's been sat in the White House being adored by Trump and his team of fawning, dangerously unhinged sociopathic bootlickers... Image
Read this excellent article by Professor of International Politics at Lancaster University, Amalendu Misra, the author of seven critically acclaimed monographs on conflict and peace, whose primary research concerns violence in the political process.

theconversation.com/nayib-bukele-e…
Trump has unleashed a string of controversial policies since returning to the White House that have put his administration at odds with most of the world. He's also forged an alliance with one country that is willing to do his bidding abroad: El Salvador.

theconversation.com/most-of-the-wo…
Read 26 tweets
Apr 17
🧵

The techno-dystopia many have warned about looks a lot closer today, after @WIRED revealed that Peter Thiel's #Palantir (which has a £500 million contract with #NHS England to manage our patient data across NHS trusts) is involved in Elon Musk’s DOGE.

wired.com/story/palantir…
If you're unaware of who unhinged billionaire tech-bro Peter Thiel is, and why he should have nothing to do with the UK or our #NHS, or how he groomed and installed his protégé JD Vance in the White House, or how he's not keen on democracy, read this:

The BMA are concerned about patient data privacy & Palantir’s ties to US intelligence.

DOGE, Palantir, & IRS representatives have been collaborating to build a single API layer above all IRS databases at an event previously characterized as a “hackathon.”
publictechnology.net/2023/11/22/hea…
Read 25 tweets
Apr 16
🧵 A scholar who specialises in how Universities respond to authoritarian pressure across different political systems, cultural contexts & historical moments warns that compliance with the Trump administration will not protect their funding & independence.
theconversation.com/universities-i…Image
Many American universities, widely seen globally as beacons of academic integrity and free speech, are giving in to demands from the Trump administration, which has been targeting academia since it took office.

psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/darwin…
Even before seizing power in 1933, the Nazi Party was closely monitoring German universities through nationalist student groups & sympathetic faculty, flagging professors deemed politically unreliable – particularly Jews, Marxists, liberals & pacifists.

theguardian.com/education/2021…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(