Well there's some very interesting & innovative attempts to clarify Priti Patel's new laws around #protest in the 'Noise-related provisions: Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Act 2022 #factsheet'.
The Act allows police to place conditions on public processions, public assemblies & one-person protests where it is reasonably believed that the noise they generated "may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation carried on in the vicinity...
...or have a significant impact on people in the vicinity of the protest."
Priti Patel also "has a power, by regulations, to further define the meaning of 'serious disruption' & provide further clarity to police in the use of these powers."
Clear as mud.
"Recent months have shown that certain tactics employed by some protestors have had a hugely detrimental effect on the hardworking majority seeking to go about their daily lives."
"Hardworking majority" is a cliché used in the Telegraph/Sun/Mail, & party political broadcasts.
"These powers do not silence protestors or curb freedom of expression."
This - like so much that Priti Patel, Boris Johnson & other Government cabinet members & foreign/non-dom billionaire-owned newspapers claim - is obviously a straightforward lie.
"The power to set noise-related conditions will only be used in the most exceptional of circumstances, where police assess the noise from protests to be unjustifiable & damaging to others."
I'm no expert, but "damaging" & "unjustifiable" seems pretty subjective concepts to me.
4.2 Will these measures ban protests for being too noisy?
"No, the police will only be able to impose conditions on unjustifiably noisy protests that may have a significant impact on others or may seriously disrupt the activities of an organisation."
Here, "no" means "YES". 😬
"The threshold for being able to impose conditions on noisy protests is appropriately high. The police will only use it in case where it is deemed necessary & proportionate."
The old "necessary & proportionate" as used with stop & search & use of force (whenever "reasonable").😬
4.3 Will these measures stop protestors from expressing their views?
"Absolutely not." *cough* "This measure has nothing to do with the content of the noise generated by a protest, just the level of the noise."
Rules around precise noise levels & proximity to source are absent.
4.4 Why target one-person protests?
"This particular measure only relates to the noise generated from a single-person protest & does not introduce any other situations in which police can place conditions on single-person protests."
4.5 What kind of scenarios could police impose noise-related conditions in?
Hypothetical scenarios include:
"a noisy protest in a town centre may not meet the threshold, but a protest creating the same amount of noise outside a school might."
"a noisy protest outside an office with double glazing may not meet the threshold, but a protest creating the same amount of noise outside a small GP surgery, or small street-level businesses might."
So organise protests outside double-glazed buildings? 😬
4.6 How often do the police impose conditions on protests?
"Data from the National Police Chiefs’ Council suggests that, out of over 2500 protests between 21 January & 21 April 2021, the police imposed conditions no more than a dozen times."
I feel a new record coming on!
So there we have it:
Clear as mud for both protesters & police
Police decide what is "justifiable" noise
Almost totally subjective as noise levels aren't specified
Priti Patel now has the freedom "to further define the meaning of serious disruption." 😬
Americans who care about democracy, justice & the planet have to come together to prevent another Trump administration, which would attempt to introduce the regressive, antidemocratic & dangerously irresponsible policies laid out in the Heritage Foundation's #Project2025
Biden has endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to replace him as the nominee.
Before outlining some essential information about Harris, I'll quickly summarise the process be for choosing the Democratic nominee as described by Newsweek.
In a statement emailed to Newsweek, Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair Jaime Harrison said that the party would "undertake a transparent and orderly process to move forward as a united Democratic Party with a candidate who can defeat Donald Trump in November."
Professor of History & Public Policy at Duke University & author of the terrifying award-winning bestseller 'Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America', Nancy MacLean, recently discussed #Project2025.
Law professor & social critic Kimberlé Crenshaw interviewed MacLean about what the prescriptions in the Heritage Foundation’s #Project2025 mean for parents, public schools, & for multiracial democracy.
CRENSHAW: These wars on curricula are not new, of course; they go far back in our history. What folks might not know is that the Heritage Foundation, the main convenor of #Project2025, cut its teeth on curricular wars in the 1970s.
'The Republican blueprint for power contains the seeds of its own demise. It is not too late to stop the descent of the American political order into tyranny, oligarchy or anarchy', writes Timothy Snyder.
Pete Buttigieg is an American politician and former naval officer who is serving as the 19th United States secretary of transportation. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the 32nd mayor of South Bend, Indiana, from 2012 to 2020, which earned him the nickname "Mayor Pete".
Buttigieg is a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Oxford, attending the latter on a Rhodes Scholarship. From 2009 to 2017, he was an intelligence officer in the United States Navy Reserve, attaining the rank of lieutenant.
Hitler survived assassination attempts. We know what that led to. Reagan & Thatcher survived assassination attempts. They gave us neoliberalism. Trump survived. He's chosen JD Vance as his running mate. If elected, America will become a dystopian free-market kleptocracy.
The 0.01% is gearing up to all but destroy US democracy.
Leading the charge & donating tens of millions of dollars to Trump's campaign are Silicon Valley's libertarian Tech billionaire extremists, led by Peter Thiel & Elon Musk - two of the most dangerous men on earth.
What's unfolding right now is like something from a dystopian sci-fi novel.
Except it's not fiction - it's real.
And it's a fucking nightmare assault on truth, fairness, equality, minorities, women's right, the environment & humanity, which democracy will struggle to survive.
"What first made Reform UK's white, privately educated multimillionaires Farage, Tice & Rupert Lowe oppose DEI?"
'Diversity Equity Inclusion' is a framework which promotes the fair treatment & full participation of ALL people, but particularly underrepresented groups...
Many people know that the term ‘DEI’ is being weaponized as a racist dog whistle (a coded, deniable bit of language that allows people to communicate ideas that would be too offensive if done explicitly).
There’s nothing new about using racist dog whistles. But the way DEI is used to play into racist sentiments is uniquely powerful, & may well be much more potent than other culture war terms.