The General posted this charming tweet, a video of slithering snakes, the day after #Colombia’s transitional justice tribunal concluded that the military killed 6,402 civilians between 2002-2008. Those denouncing “false positives,” you see, were reptiles.
Here’s the General, at one of the most intense moments of #Colombia’s 2021 National Strike, calling the feared ESMAD riot police “heroes in black,” urging them to “keep working as you have been.” The ESMAD were killing and maiming dozens of protesters.
Following a March 2022 raid (colombiapeace.org/what-we-know-a…) in which soldiers likely killed at least 4 non-combatants, the General said, “This isn’t the first operation in which pregnant women and minors get killed.”
When candidate Petro, on Twitter, accused officers of colluding w/ the neo-paramilitary Gulf Clan, the General made a highly irregular foray into electoral politics, reviving an accusation that Petro had taken a cash bribe (charges were dropped in 2021).
Gen. Eduardo Zapateiro sent damaging messages on human rights. His public statements made the armed forces appear improperly aligned with a specific political ideology.
Meanwhile, #Colombia’s insecurity measures worsened, and armed groups proliferated. So no, I won’t miss him.
So next time you hear @lopezobrador_ go on about #Mexico's sovereignty and US imperialism, recall that his government has invited US agents into Mexico's international airports to screen passengers.
This part 1/2:
"The curious thing is that, alongside the INM agents was another official, of US origin, dressed in civilian clothes, who also reviewed documents, asked questions, and checked travelers' cell phones: their WhatsApp, their Facebook profiles, their photo albums."
Calling Rodolfo Hernández the “Trump of #Colombia” seems off to me. Here, I see more parallels with all-over-the-map populists like AMLO or Bukele. And if Hernández wins, US-Colombian relations could resemble current relations with Mexico or El Salvador…
…by which I mean: the Biden administration distances itself from the president and civilian leadership, even as it pursues the closest possible military-to-military relationship. Which isn't great.
(Of course, the "military-to-military relationship being stronger than the civilian relationship" thing is even more likely if Petro wins.)
Far fewer people applying for asylum in #Mexico this year are from #Haiti, compared to last year. #Honduras is back in the number-1 position, followed by #Cuba.
Your workload is elevated if you work at a shelter, practice asylum law, or recover remains of migrants who've fallen off the border wall, drowned, or dehydrated.
Border Patrol agents, too, are busy processing asylum—a job that doesn't really require a uniform, gun, or badge.
Unless you work with protection-seeking migrants, it's business as usual in all US border towns I've visited (San Diego, Del Rio, Eagle Pass, Laredo, McAllen, Brownsville).
Schools, supermarkets, restaurants, malls...open and normal. "Disaster zone" talk is politicized nonsense.
0/33 Here's a late-night thread about the border right now. This is me talking, not a deliberated WOLA consensus. I have blind spots—we all do—and welcome good-faith corrections.
tl;dr: Even today's high levels of family and asylum-seeking migration are manageable without drama.
1/33 Many Democrats, including those who support immigration reform, see images like this one and worry. They see themselves losing ground to the Greg Abbotts and Ted Cruzes. Even among Latino constituents who had voted reliably Democratic.
2/33 Why would they be losing ground among moderate voters who don't consider themselves anti-immigrant? Because these images look chaotic. They look disorderly.