Attending an academic conference soon?
Going by reports and polls on Twitter, you probably have a 10-20% chance of getting #COVID19 there.
Here's a small thread with some evidence and some suggestions. 1/
2/ ACM #SIGGRAPH, a major conference and trade fair with up to 20,000 attendees, will take place in Vancouver next month, right in time for the peak of a COVID wave.
That means that probably 2000 people will return home infected with COVID.
3/ Of these 2000 people with COVID, a few hundred people will be knocked out for a few days or weeks.
About 1% might suffer from *debilitating* #LongCOVID effects - i.e. 20 attendees will suffer from a major illness for weeks or months or more.
nature.com/articles/s4146…
4/ With an infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0.1 % for Omicron, (hard to estimate, but probably in the right ballpark), someone might even die because they attended the conference.
nature.com/articles/s4157…
5/ To put that into context, a conference where multiple people fell down the stairs and suffered broken bones because the organizers didn't care enough about safety, would probably mean legal trouble for the organizers.
But luckily, ACM and #SIGGRAPH have taken care of this: ImageImage
6/ But how many people will really be infected at SIGGRAPH? Let's look at some anecdotal data.
Here's A lower bound of at least 5.5% of all attendees for ACM #CHI2022 in New Orleans (masks mandatory at conference venue!):
8/ Here's an article about COVID infections at #CHI2022, calling it a 'superspreader event'.
insidehighered.com/news/2022/05/1…
9/ Here's a lower bound of at least 5% of all attendees for #ICA22 in Paris:
10/ A Twitter poll where 19% of respondents who recently attended any medical conference caught COVID:
11/ A medical conference with 20% of attendees infected:
12/ About 30-50% of attendees infected at #OHBM2022 (poll with 1300 responses representing at least 20% of all attendees)
13/ An article about medical conferences as super-spreading events:
"Among the 11 programs that responded, the number of attendees ranged from five to more than 50, and Covid-19 case rates ranged from 18% to 67%."
statnews.com/2022/06/14/the…
14/ Further reports of many hundreds infections at a single conference, such as:
15/ And many more anecdotes from dozens of people who caught COVID at a conference:
twitter.com/search?q=confe…
16/ Altogether, these individual, semi-reliable reports make it reasonably certain that attending an in-person conference at the moment comes with a risk of 10-20% (maybe more) of getting COVID-19.
17/ So, what are the alternatives? Obviously, the safest option for any individual is not to attend conferences at all. However, especially for early-career researchers, this is a hard choice to make:
18/ If conference organizers want to make in-person conferences more COVID-safe - and thus more inclusive, an absolutely essential measure would be requiring masks indoors.
As far as I know, nobody who masked up at all times during a conference got COVID.
19/ That leaves official and private social events where people eat, drink, talk, and infect each other.
Requiring masks at such events is quite impossible. Completely skipping social events is not desirable for most attendees, either.
20/ Instead, conference organizers could host social events outdoors or in extremely well-ventilated spaces (i.e. 500 ppm CO2) and avoid crowds at buffets, etc.
How about an outdoor pool reception?
21/ Conference organizers could also highlight nice outdoor venues close to the conference center so that participants have a choice of safe options for having a beer in the evening.
22/ Also, there is certainly a positive relationship between conference size/place and risk of infection. The more people you meet and the farther you travel, the more opportunities for getting COVID. Smaller, regional conferences might be a good idea, also re. #ClimateEmergency
23/ That's it from me for now. I'll probably keep adding new reports and thoughts to this thread over time.
24/ Collecting reliable stats about COVID infections at conferences might be a good idea, too. Maybe at least add a question to the post-conference survey.

26/ CO2 levels at conferences are too damn high! More fresh air, less risk of infection (and less cognitive impairment).
27/ Less than 1% of attendees infected at #AAS240 (mandatory masking, outdoor receptions)
28/ Some helpful advice (tl;dr: wear a mask at all times)
29/ The initial tweet is slightly incorrect. Of course, your *individual* risk to catch COVID-19 is not 10%-20% - especially if you are wearing a mask all the time. However, as an organizer of a maskless conference, you should be prepared for 1/5 of attendees getting ill.
30/ Oh, with #CVPR2022 there was yet another superspreader event at the same conference venue as #CHI2022. 20%-40% of respondents got COVID.
31/ If only someone had warned #CVPR2022 organizers that not requiring masks is a bad idea.
Oh.

32/ It seems that having social gatherings outdoors but not requiring masks indoors isn't a viable strategy for preventing infections.
34/ Are smaller conferences inherently safer? Maybe not that much at the current COVID prevalence - the number of people you have close contact with does not go up linearly with increasing conference size.
Here's another 10-20% infections from #OzHA2022
35/ A thread by @margaveldhuizen about the personal and financial risks smaller groups have to take by attending unsafe conferences (#FENS2022).
36/ For context, here's the opening event of #FENS2022

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Raphael‏ Wimmer

Raphael‏ Wimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RaphaelWimmer

Dec 22, 2020
Zwei Wochen sind seither vergangen.
Einen echten Shutdown gab es nicht.
Inzidenz klar steigend, obwohl wir einen Rückgang brauchen würden.
1/7
2/ Die u.a. von @ViolaPriesemann geforderte Inzidenz von <50 erreichen wir laut covid-simulator.com/simulator/ nur dann, wenn wir sofort gut drei Wochen strikten(!) Shutdown (Rt=0.5) durchziehen.
3/ Wenn wir schon vor zwei Wochen einen echten Shutdown vollzogen hätten, hätten statt der drei Wochen auch nur zwei Wochen ausgereicht.

Read 10 tweets
Nov 21, 2019
@carlagriggio @sigchi This is strange in multiple ways. It seems quite obvious that the fake title in the PDF metadata originated from ACM Word templates. However, the template at acm.org/publications/a… uses yet another title: "Magnetic Normal Modes of Bi-Component Permalloy Structures"
@carlagriggio @sigchi If you search for this term, you get another group of papers with wrong metadata: google.com/search?q="Magnetic+Normal+Modes+of+Bi-Component+Permalloy+Structures"
@carlagriggio @sigchi This title is a little bit closer to the title of the original paper where author names and content have been lifted from apparently: "Magnetic normal modes of bicomponent permalloy/cobalt structures in the parallel and antiparallel ground state" journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/1…
Read 9 tweets
Sep 22, 2019
@macinally68 @HBraun Es ist klar, dass da keine Hau-Ruck-Lösung möglich ist. Aber mittelfristig (10-30 Jahre) wollen wir doch ein Land, in dem Pendeln die Ausnahme ist. Wegen des CO2-Ausstoßes, aber auch wegen der Pendler, der Familien und der lokalen Gemeinschaften, die zur Ader gelassen werden. 1/n
@macinally68 @HBraun Ich pendle selbst täglich 20 km (einfach) mit dem ÖPNV (da habe ich Glück mit der Verbindung) und war jahrelang Fernpendler (150 km). Ich kenne keinen Fernpendler, dem das Spaß macht. Und die wenigsten haben die Möglichkeit, während der Fahrt sinnvoll zu arbeiten. 2/n
@macinally68 @HBraun In den letzten 30 Jahren habe ich miterlebt, welchen negativen Einfluss das Pendeln - ob nah oder fern - auf dörfliche Gemeinschaften, lokale Geschäfte und Engagement in Vereinen hat. 3/n
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(