Here's my latest in @RealClearEnergy on the ongoing backlash against big renewables. Butler Cty, OH, banned #wind & #solar projects in 12 townships. The ban marks the 344th rejection of wind in the US over the past decade. @LinowesLisa
@RealClearEnergy@LinowesLisa As I have reported many times, the raging backlash against the renewable industry doesn’t fit the convenient narrative that wind and solar are “green” and that they are “cheaper” than traditional forms of energy production. /2
These rejections are not being covered by The New York Times or National Public Radio, but they reflect the growing outrage in rural American towns and counties over the land grab that is being attempted by some of America’s biggest companies in the name of climate change. /3
Further, as siting wind and solar projects has gotten more difficult, big renewable companies are resorting to hardball legal tactics to intimidate location communities into accepting projects they do not want. /4
For example, in May, Chicago-based Invenergy, the world’s largest privately held renewable energy company, sued Worth County, Iowa as part of an effort to force the county to accept a wind project the county doesn’t want. /5
That lawsuit came after MidAmerican Energy, a subsidiary of corporate behemoth Berkshire Hathaway, sued Madison County, Iowa, the province known for its picturesque wooden bridges. /6
Over the past few months, Iowa, Ohio, and Wisconsin have emerged as the epicenter of the rural backlash against Big Wind and, increasingly, Big Solar. Ohio is particularly notable because last year, Senate Bill 52 took effect. /7
That measure allows counties to prohibit the construction of renewable projects. As reported by EnergyWire, “Policy support for renewables has been eroding in Ohio for a decade.” /8
SB 52 provides a clear example of the growing urban-rural divide when it comes to renewable energy policy. The bill was signed into law by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, (a Republican) passed through both chambers of the Ohio legislature but it did not get a single Democratic vote. /9
The ban covers “all unincorporated areas within Reily Township, Fairfield Township, Hanover Township, Liberty Township, Madison Township, Milford Township, Morgan Township, Oxford Township, Ross Township, St. Clair Township, Wayne Township, and West Chester Township.” /10
Butler County has 13 townships. Of those, 12 are included in the ban on new wind and solar. I’ll conclude with another quote from Callahan’s coverage of the Butler County ban on large renewable projects. /11
County Commissioner Cindy Carpenter, who said the county agreed to implement the ban because local township officials “speak to us as the voice of the citizens. So I have decided to support their request.”
Again, here's a link to the article: realclearenergy.org/articles/2022/…
And here's a link to the Renewable Rejection Database: /FIN
Last week, BP released its annual Statistical Review & the report shows, yet again, that electricity is the world’s most important & fastest-growing form of energy. In '21, electricity generation grew by a record 1,577 TWh
/1 thehill.com/opinion/energy…
That's an increase of 6.2% over 2020. For perspective, last year’s increase in electricity production was greater than the electricity output of France, Germany and Britain combined. /2
The surge in electricity generation — nearly half of which happened in China — reflects the jump in demand for power as the world recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic. The numbers also show that, despite all the hype about renewable energy and the “energy transition,” /3
My latest, in @RealClearEnergy re surging global coal consumption
The global energy crisis has resulted in a spasm of plain talk. Last week, Vaclav Bartuška, the Czech Ambassador-at-Large for energy security, told a group of reporters
(Thread) 1/x
@RealClearEnergy “If there is a gas cut out this winter, we will burn anything we can to keep our people warm and to make electricity.” Bartuška said aloud what has become obvious over the past months: climate change concerns are taking a backseat to economic considerations. h/t @energybants
2/x
@RealClearEnergy@energybants Indeed, all around the world, countries are turning back to coal to produce power and the resulting emissions from increasing coal use will obliterate all of the emissions reductions that have been achieved in the United States over the past decade and a half. @briangitt
3/x
My latest @RealClearEnergy :
If you think the world is moving #beyondcoal think again...over the past few weeks, China & India have announced plans to increase their domestic #coal production by a combined total of 700M tons/yr. @JudeClemente@SierraClub
@RealClearEnergy@JudeClemente@SierraClub For perspective, US coal production this year will total about 600M tons. The surge in coal demand in China and India – as well as in the U.S., where coal use jumped by 17% last year – demonstrates two things:
@RealClearEnergy@JudeClemente@SierraClub First, it shows that the Iron Law of Electricity has not been broken,Second, it shows that it is far easier to talk about cutting emissions than it is to achieve significant cuts. @BrianGitt
My latest @forbes: EU Finally Admits Nat Gas & Nuclear Are Key To Decarbonization
It is a "tacit acknowledgment by European policymakers of the energy disaster that is now shaking the region. But it’s also far too late in coming.” @chrishelman
@Forbes@chrishelman Europe cannot — will not — move to “a predominantly renewable-based future.” The never-ending claims that Europe, or any other region with a large economy, can run solely on “clean energy technologies like wind and solar,” are not based on history, math, or physics.
@Forbes@chrishelman Two days ago, Bloomberg ran a story...which said that Europe is “in the midst of an energy transition, shutting down coal-fired electricity plants and increasing its reliance on renewables. Wind and solar are cleaner but sometimes fickle...”