JesseJenkins Profile picture
Jul 8 23 tweets 12 min read
NEW REPORT: Europe can ELIMINATE reliance on Russian #NaturalGas by augmenting #REPowerEU plans w/temporary boost in coal & recalibrated gas storage.
ZERO Lab modeled 🇪🇺+🇬🇧 gas & electric grids & find several paths to secure full independence from 🇷🇺 gas: zenodo.org/record/6811676…
2. Success depends on larger reductions in gas-fired electricity generation by temporarily increasing coal use (a trend we're already seeing reuters.com/world/europe/e…), reducing electricity demand & accelerating renewable energy deployment. Multiple combos of these three can work.
3. Despite increased reliance on coal for electricity generation, all successful gas independence scenarios result in significant declines in European greenhouse gas emissions as lower gas demand offsets emissions from increased coal combustion.
4. In addition to reducing gas use in electricity generation, the overall strategy for European independence from Russian natural gas depends on increased pipeline gas & liquified natural gas imports from alternative sources & reducing gas demand in heating and industry.
5. Europe also needs to rethink its gas storage targets. EU regulations currently require gas stores to be 90% full by winter (abcnews.go.com/International/….), but equal levels of energy security can be achieved w/lower storage volumes since total gas use will fall under this strategy.
6. Our report identifies multiple combinations of these actions that can successfully eliminate Europe’s dependence on Russian gas, giving policymakers leeway to craft a preferred approach based on national priorities. There's more than one way to get free of Russian gas!
7. These actions would be sustained for the next two winters. Emergency measures, incl. demand reduction & increased coal generation, would be steadily replaced by increased renewables, electrified heating & LNG imports & would not imperil Europe’s longer-term energy transition.
8. We began this analysis in the immediate aftermath of Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine. In particular @wilson_ricks @Michael48831282 & @NehaSPatankar volunteered spare time to conduct detailed analysis of European gas & electric grids, global energy markets, etc.
9. We focused in immediately on natural gas, recognizing that it would be the most difficult challenge for Europe AND the most significant economic weapon left to defund the Kremlin's war effort. The reason: unlike oil, ~90% of Russian gas flows to Europe via pipeline not sea.
10. That makes it much more difficult for Europe to secure alternative gas supplies than for oil or coal. It also explains why REpowerEU (ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…) plans to reduce Russian gas use by 2/3rds this year but only aims to achieve complete independence “well before 2030”
11. Yet until fully independent from Russian gas, Europe will be critically vulnerable if the Kremlin cuts off gas flows (), particularly in winter, when it would both economically devastating & potentially deadly for Europeans that depend on gas for heat.
12. A partial but incomplete reduction in Russian gas use thus gives the Kremlin incredible leverage over Europe, which it has already begun to exercise but choking off gas flows to certain European countries, as @GeorgZachmann details @Bruegel_org
13. But the leverage goes both ways!

If Europe can successfully sever itself from Russian gas, it is effectively impossible for Russia to find alternative buyers for its gas.
14. Russian exports via LNG and pipelines to the east are far less than current production, meaning that if Europe stops buying, the prices Russia earns for remaining exports would collapse and revenues for the Kremlin's war effort would plummet.
15. That's key, because while Europe & UK have pledged & delivered military & financial support to Ukraine, they have also paid Russia nearly $70 (€66) billion for fossil fuels since the start of the war, including $31 (€29) billion for natural gas alone crea.shinyapps.io/russia_counter/
16. Much of this funding flows directly to the Kremlin via Russian state-owned energy companies, which supply about 45% of Russia's government revenue in 2021 (and surely a higher share today)—meaning that Europe is literally funding both sides of the conflict in Ukraine.
17. Energy exports also provide Russia with its last major source of foreign currency exchange (which is why its demanding European buyers pay bills in rubles marketwatch.com/story/orsted-r…), playing a critical role in helping the Russian economy weather impacts of financial sanctions.
18. All of this raises the urgency & importance of securing European energy independence and security, particularly the elimination of Russian gas imports as soon as possible. And that's why ZERO Lab put together this analysis.
19. What we did here: modeled European natural gas and electricity systems at a high temporal resolution and country-level spatial resolution to assess the feasibility and potential impact of a near-complete embargo on imports of Russian natural gas to Europe beginning in October
20. We use a 37-zone model of the European ENTSO-E electricity system (based on open source Pypsa-EUR, thanks to @nworbmot's team, ported to our GenX model genxproject.github.io/GenX/) to assess the impact of reductions in gas-fired electricity generation on the European grid.
21. These results ensure electricity reliability and quantify electricity sector gas consumption, which is passed into a model of the ENTSO-G gas network, which optimizes imports, storage & pipeline transport between countries to minimize gas supply shortfalls for 28 countries.
22. More on what we did in screenshot below. The models & data for both the gas & electric grids are open source & available for those who want to dig in or build on this analysis at zenodo.org/record/6811676… (some data still uploading now).
#FreeTheModels #OpenMod
23. Check out the full report and a short FAQ and please share, especially with European colleagues!

(And my apologies for dropping this after 5pm on Friday in Berlin/London etc.)

CC @janrosenow @DrSimEvans @laurimyllyvirta @LionHirth @nworbmot @Bruegel_org @GeorgZachmann
<End>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JesseJenkins

JesseJenkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JesseJenkins

Jul 7
🚨 New ZERO Lab paper! 🚨
"Modeling the operational flexibility of natural gas combined cycle power plants coupled with flexible carbon capture and storage via solvent storage and flexible regeneration" led by @fangwei_cheng doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgg…

#MacroEnergySystems
This work is part of our modeling support & analysis for @ARPAE FLECCS program, which supports development of a dozen designs for flexible carbon capture at natural gas-fired power plants. We're helping ARPAE & FLECCS teams evaluate each design & select Phase 2 $$ to demo tech.
We developed a detailed, modular representation of a flexible solvent storage system that enables shifting of the energy consumption for solvent regeneration to times of low power prices. @fangwei_cheng has painstakingly implemented about 8 other detailed designs for FLECCS too.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 30
SCOTUS decision on WV v EPA is out. Im actually breathing a sigh of relief. In what may be best of plausible outcomes, a radical SCOTUS that has been tearing up precedent all term left EPA’s authority to regulate climate-warming gases intact, though more narrowly constrained.
The Majority's introduction of 'major questions doctrine' will result in more legal uncertainty for new regulations, as lower courts have a new tool to reach for when they want to strike down a rule they dont like, increasing number of legal controversies & time to sort out. Bad.
Given all of the rulings this term, it felt like this Court was ready to 'shoot the moon' & go for the jugular to strike Court's general deference to agency interpretation of statute or ability of Congress to delegate details to administrative agencies at all. They did not. Good.
Read 12 tweets
May 11
This reporting from @robinsonmeyer is bleak. And extremely concerning.

'Pelosi repeatedly justified climate action by saying it was “for the children.”

But climate action was “for the children” in the 1990s. “We’re not doing this for the children ... We’re doing this for us!"' Image
The final sands are running out of the hourglass for Congress to act on climate AND energy security.
Where the hell is the urgency? Why are Pelosi, Schumer & Biden not working night and day to finish the job? Are they really happy to just ... fade into the night and the minority?
My lord. Is it really up to Joe Manchin to save us? Because he seems to be the only one to have recognized that the war in Ukraine changes the entire context for energy legislation. If there's any hope now, it is through marrying climate and energy security priorities.
Read 4 tweets
May 10
$34 billion and 10 years. The performance of Southern Co. & Westinghouse at Vogtle is utterly unacceptable. If it is best the sector can do, nuclear has no future. I think new small modular reactors can do better, but they have to prove it. No one will believe it until we see it.
For those missing conditional statement above: read it again. IF this is the best they can do. Challenge is to build confidence the sector can do better than this. We have examples that build hope from South Korea, China, the UAE. Yet we've seen repeated failure in the West too.
This was fun but now it's done...
Read 5 tweets
May 5
Folks. We're going to need nuclear power (fission or even fusion) to decarbonize the global economy. Nations like US, Canada, Australia, China etc blessed with land can drive to net-zero with renewables only IF they so choose. But a Net-zero India? South Korea? Japan? Indonesia?
Even EU officials are admitting Europe will need to import large quantities of green hydrogen from abroad due to constraints on siting sufficient wind and solar within the continent. rechargenews.com/energy-transit…
Perhaps a global trade in green hydrogen or ammonia can supply these land constrained nations. But will they wish to rely on imports? To what degree? Will it be cheaper than domestic nuclear?
Read 7 tweets
Apr 16
#Bitcoin folks touting it as a flexible electricity demand that's going to somehow run only on excess wind and solar energy & help decarbonize the grid: Show me the marginal value of a MWh of electricity turned into #BTC . Then compare said value to $0/MWh. Now please stop.
My math: based on 460,000 Bitcoin mined in 2020 and 80 million MWh electricity consumed that year, that's 0.00575 BTC per MWh. Current BTC value is about $40,000. Implies miners willing to pay up to $230 per MWh. Sources for coins mined and electricity consumed in screenshot ⤵️ Image
At this MWh to BTC conversion rate, BTC price would need to fall an order of magnitude to under $4,000 to be willing to curtail mining at electricity prices > ~$23/MWh, which might plausibly qualify as a truly flexible demand (arguably under $1,800 to curtail mining at ~$10/MWh).
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(