Those claiming @KemiBadenoch rowed back on the UK 2050 #NetZero target yesterday appear to have missed the main point. Which is, that a target needs a plan, and is useless without. She's not wrong
And yesterday's High Court ruling theguardian.com/environment/20… confirms that the next PM will need to develop a better plan than exists right now
In the course of doing that, the next PM (whether @KemiBadenoch or any other #ToryLeadershipContest contender) would take briefings from real experts rather than Tufton St has-beens and would discover that a) the 2050 target is not arbitrary but based in science and fairness,
b) accelerating energy efficiency, renewables and EVs will cut energy bills, grow 21st Century industries and remove reliance on despotic regimes, c) there is substantial public appetite, d) 2050 is eminently doable,
e) the main government intervention needed now isn't financial support but removing barriers to private sector investment, and f) pacé the #heatwave, the #CostOfNotZero will comfortably and with great certainty exceed investment needed to reach the 2050 target.
Yes, a target needs a plan and no, the government's current one isn't good enough. Personally I'd like to see candidates acknowledging this should be among the next PM's priority items - not just because it needs to be, but because of the huge opportunities #NetZero presents
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: At last year's UN climate summit #COP26 in Glasgow, governments recognised the paucity of their carbon-cutting plans for this decade and urged each other to make new ones before the end of this year
'...requests Parties to revisit and strengthen the 2030 targets in their nationally determined contributions as necessary to align with the Paris Agreement temperature goal by the end of 2022...' is the exact wording unfccc.int/sites/default/…
As enshrined in the UN climate convention, prosperous nations have a duty to go first
I'm not going to argue that the Russian state or any of its agencies never campaigned against fracking in the West, because I don't know - it's certainly credible that they would have done so
But on the part of the frackophiles, there is no evidence that Russia funded environment groups. Rather, one quote and one report circulate endlessly, as though they gain credibility through repetition.
Three pieces in @Telegraph today, two in @TheSun, and Jacob Rees-Mogg all cheerleading ‘gas, gas gas’ – during an energy price crisis caused by gas dependence, which increasing gas production cannot solve
The short version: gas extracted in British fields doesn't belong to Britain, it's owned by commercial companies who sell to the highest bidder. No way to change that except by export controls or public ownership - good luck with either of those
Production in UK would always be tiny compared to Russia etc who can and do manipulate supply and prices for political reasons
THREAD: Something curious turns up in the gas statistics released this morning by government
Curious because at a time of eye-wateringly high gas prices, with Vladimir Putin at the Ukraine's door, with warnings of dire outcomes everywhere and the oil industry telling us that continuing UK oil and gas extraction is necessary for energy security ogauthority.co.uk/news-publicati…
...at a time when politicians like @RobertJenricktelegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/2… are urging 'us' to increase 'our production' of oil and gas to avoid exposure to internationally-sparked price hikes...
As we approach the final hours of #COP26, it's worth asking what impact it'll have on the UK
Firstly, the UK has finally hosted one of these things, 32 years after then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s call for a UN climate treaty margaretthatcher.org/document/107817. The UK has always had an important role in the process but hosting this summit makes the connection more visceral…
…especially as it comes at a time when public concern on climate change and support for a zero-carbon transition have never been higher - that's true globally too btw theguardian.com/environment/20…