LawBeat Profile picture
Jul 20 43 tweets 12 min read
A #SupremeCourt bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, will today hear a batch of petitions pertaining to #MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis

#EknathSinde #UddhavThackarey
Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv: If this principle was to be accepted, every elected government can be toppled. The only protection is merger. There can be no split in law.

Sibal reads from a note.

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Sibal: The governor could not have sworn who has chosen voluntarily to separate himself from a recognised. This court Said it will hear the matter, however the governor swore #EknathSinde as CM.

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Sibal: On our disqualification petitions, the speaker does not issue notice. In our’s notice has still not been issued. The court should call for the records of the assembly and in the meantime nothing should be done. The disqualification should be decided!
Sibal: What happens to the will of the people if governments are toppled like this. When we came to court, it stayed the proceedings before the Deputy Speaker, next day a floor test was called!

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Sibal: This is a mockery of the democratic structure. In which democratic society can people be bought over and an elected government can be toppled? Every day’s delay will play havoc with the institutions.

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Dr. AM Singhvi: The court has to decide a fundamental point. There are 10 judgments which say it is a constitutional sin. The departing faction of #ShivSena , one day before departing to Guwahati send a letter to DY speaker. It was sent from an unauthorised email
Singhvi: The speaker says he cannot take on record. Should the Dy speaker take on record anything that is sent to him? This was done because they want to misuse a sentence that is totally inapplicable. They cannot create a non-genuine situation.
Singhvi: They say “I am merrily defecting by the Dy Speaker cannot decide because he is disabled from doing so”. They then go ahead with the floor test, if 4 people are disqualified here, a disqualified person cant vote. How can floor test happen ?

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Singhvi: Entire majority is a contrived majority!
Singhvi: It is common ground that #Eknath_Shinde has not merged with any party. They cannot be disqualified only if they merge with another political party and yet they are not disqualified, vote in a floor test and form a government

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Singhvi: This is a very important moral, legal and constitutional aspect. The speaker has not even issued notice on our disqualification plea. When they filed a plea for disqualification he issues notice. The court has the power to decide this.

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Singhvi: The court should uphold the purity of the process, otherwise it will be a mockery of the 10th schedule. The court should called for a record
Harish Salve, Sr. Adv, appears for #EknathSinde .

Salve: if there is disaffection between the party and if the party feels someone else should be their leader. The moment you challenged the authority by staying in the party, it is not defection.

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Salve: The number of people who did not want the then CM to continue because so large that he resigned. The court has always never interfered in working of political parties. There is a very narrow area in which court can intervene in party’s working
Salve: Anti defection law is not self operating. There has to be a petition and an order.

CJI: We will hear you, initially I had some doubts. This is just a thought process. After removal of para 3 from 10th schedule, concept of split is not recognised, what are the consequenc
Salve: Could the court turn to para 2, “a person belonging to any political party shall be disqualified from being the member of the house, if he has voluntarily gives up membership or if he votes contrary to the whip” These are the 2 primary basis.

#MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Salve: If a person elected from Party A, goes to the governor and says he is voting for a member of Party B. You may say he is disqualified. If a member says, this CM is not enjoying the support, he is not disqualified. Ultimately a member from #ShivSena is now in office.
Salve: Where is the defection here? Are we in such a hopeless situation, who cannot find support from 15 MLAs in his party is brought back by the court?

#UddhavThackeray #MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Salve: I have a right in a party democracy to raise my vote of protest. However, if I go and vote against the CM, I may be disqualified. RAISING YOUR VOICE WITHIN A PARTY, IS NOT AN ACT OF DISQUALIFICATION.

#MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
Salve: They are asking the court to become a 10th schedule tribunal. The court has not undertaken disqualification of MLAs in the past. They have filed a WP before the court.

#MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
Salve: A lot of the proportions if put in the pleadings of the WP, they do not square.

CJI: We do not have all the bundles, they have given a note.

Salve: The ground given is , that the speaker was unconstitutionally elected and his notice should be quashed.
Salve: The court will have to see. The court can have it in a day or two, I will ensure paper books reach the court. None of these larger issues have been covered.

#MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
CJI: The problem is, first of all some of the issues are important constitutional issues. We have to settle it.

Salve: I am saying that these issues may not arise. Many of them are assumptions.

#MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
Salve asks for time to file replies in the petitions so that the court will have a better idea.

Court is deliberating.
Sibal objects to it.

Singhvi: The court may direct each side to file a compilation and written submissions and the case can be had next week.

CJI: Some of the issues particularly require a hearing. If you can cull out legal issues, it will be useful.
Court is deliberating.

#MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
CJI: Alright, you prepare a compilation. You can file a common affidavit for all the WP. Let it refer to whatever you want to deny etc. When can we do it?

Sibal: Next Tuesday ?

Salve: I cannot put in by then. The court can have it on August 1st.
CJI: Some of the issues may require a consideration to larger bench. I think reference to larger bench is necessary. Can we have a larger bench?

Lawyers agree.

#MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
SG making his submissions on defection.

Jethmalani: Mr. Salve has foreshadowed the argument that much of Mr.Sibal’s argument is no longer maintainable. Significant events have happened after That.
Jethmalani: My only submissions is before it is referred to a larger bench, the court may hear us on maintainability.
CJI: I am only thinking aloud, I have not passed an order to constitute a larger bench. Please give a compilation of issues that needs to be argued. I will see it and against discuss and decide accordingly.
Sibal: The leadership of the party cannot be decided in the house. 40 members of the legislature cannot say they are the party. If anyone has to become a CM, they have to become party president. My contention is he cannot say I am the leader of the party because of assembly major
Sibal: You can’t say I will defect, I will move away and I will remove the recognised leader.

CJI: We both appeared in a case, the procedure of removing a legislature party is within the domain of the legislature party in the house. Majority have a say in the electing them
Sibal: What they say is we are sitting somewhere else, you are not the leader anymore and I am the leader.

Singhvi: That is why a whip was issued for a common meeting. They did not turn up.

Sibal: Look at para 2 of the 10th schedule milords.
Sibal: Legislature party has a role to play in the legislature. For the purpose of defection, political party matters. Small legislature can easily come and go.
ORDER:
After hearing the counsel, it is agreed that some of the issues raised requires consideration if necessary by a larger bench. Both sides to frame issues that they are going to argue. Both sides to give the issue by Wednesday.
ORDER: It is stated by Mr.Sibal as to what the lead matter is. The respondents to file a counter affidavit dealing with the factual allegations in a common affidavit. We request both the sides to prepare one compilation.
Order: It is deemed that service of notice in all writ petitions are effected. List on August 1, 2022.
CJI: Keep the records in safe custody.

Note: The date is subject to change as lawyers ask for an NMD.
Sibal: Let the status quo be maintained, nothing should be done till the next day of hearing.

SG: We are not proceeding against anybody
Hearing concludes.
Supreme Court To Hear Petitions Pertaining To Maharashtra Political Crisis On August 1, 2022
@sai_prasad_law reports
lawbeat.in/top-stories/su…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Jul 21
#SupremeCourt will shortly hear plea by #Gyanvapi Mosque Committee challenging the survey of the disputed site. The debates on the issue centred around whether the structure unearthed was a Shivlinga
Bench assembles.
Bench: the proceedings are going on before the trial court right? We were just wondering this SLP arose from the order appointing the commissioner. Now everything would depend on what view the district court. The commissioner’s report is on record.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 21
BREAKING: In a plea for termination of pregnancy by an unmarried woman who is almost 24 weeks pregnant. #SupremeCourt asks AIIMS to constitute a board of medical practitioners to to evaluate whether the foetus can be aborted without any danger to her life.
The court has directed AIIMS to carry out the abortion if the board finds fit. The court has remarked “The petitioner should not be denied benefits merely because she is unmarried.” #SupremeCourt
On July 15, Delhi HC had rejected plea of the woman seeking termination of pregnancy, who was slated to complete 24 weeks in 3 days.
Supreme Court has allowed the plea basis medical opinion. The law currently allows termination of pregnancy in the following cases: Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 21
#SupremeCourt to hear plea seeking disqualification of persons from contesting elections if they are found to be engaging in #HateSpeech and #RumourMongering.
Counsel informs the bench that other related matters are listed on July 27.

The Court have said that there is a requirement of AG in this matter while asking the counsels to wait.
The bench said that the Secretary may be directed to compile details from all the States whether the judgment in case of Poonawala, Khap Panchayat (Shakti Vahani), Pravasi Sangathan matters.
Preventive directions have been passed in these cases.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 20
#SupremeCourt hearing a batch of petitions challenging Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 and Cable Television Network (Amendment) 2021.
Earlier, the Court had directed to prepare a chart of cases involving:
"1. Challenge to #ITRules
2. Challenge to Cable TV rules
3. Petitions seeking directions over IT Rules.
4. Other set of cases involving instances of #HateSpeeches and #HateCrime."
#InformationTechnology
Counsel informed the bench that the batch of petitions seeking IT Rules have become infructuous as the rules have been made.

Another counsel has sought for a pass over.

The bench will hear the matter later.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 20
#SupremeCourt hearing the plea filed by State of Tamil Nadu seeking urgent orders
restraining the #CauveryWater Management Authority to implement the Tribunal order as modified by Supreme Court Court from deliberating the proposed construction of reservoir at Mekedatu.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for Tamil Nadu submits that the
proposed Mekedatu Reservoir Project of Karnataka is
detrimental to the interest of the farmers of Tamil
Nadu.
Senior Advocate Shyam Diwan appearing for the State of Karnataka submits, Milords it is a disposes of matter, there is no question of impacting the flow of the water.

Justice Khanwilkar: The question is whether this Authority has jurisdiction.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 20
#SupremeCourt to hear Aam Admi Party's plea challenging State Election Commission's decision to postpone Municipal Elections of Delhi.
#MunicipalElection
#Delhi
#AamAadmiParty
It is has been alleged that the elections have been postponed "without any reasonable grounds", and solely on the basis of "unofficial communication" from the Government of India.
#MunicipalElection
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for AAP submits that delimitation is no excuse and the elections shall be commenced immidiately.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(