#SupremeCourt to hear CBI's plea challenging the #AllahabadHighCourt order whereby the High Court had granted bail to #UPPCL Managing Director Ayodhya Prasad Mishra. Mishra is accused of investing the General Provident Fund amount of UPPCL employees in private companies.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for Mishra.
Senior Advocate Maninder Singh appearing for Sudhanshu Dwivedi.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati for CBI has requested for a pass over.
The bench will hear the matter later.
Counsel appearing for CBI informs the bench informs the bench that investigation on the money trail is still going on. He is the master mind.
Justice Khanwilkar: but for how long this will go on.
The bench noted that, we have no objection to the observation of the HC that no evidence has been unearthed by the CBI to indentify the money trail.
Leaving it open for the investigating officer to approach for cancellation of bail in case some condition for bail is violated.
Singh appearing for another accused seeking bail, the ED has finished the investigation and has found nothing over the money trail.
Counsel appearing for CBI: Milords, I can only show the gravity of the offence.
Justice Khanwilkar: Leave granted, as the appellant is in jail for more than two and half years and noting that the charge has already been filed we see no reason to allow the appellant on bail.
Senior Advocate R Basant appearing for Praveen Kumar Gupta (co-accused) who has been allowed on bail and the UP Government has challenged the same.
Justice Khanwilkar: We decline to interfere in this, we direct the trial court to ensure that the matter proceeds expeditiously.
Supreme Court Dismisses CBI's Plea Challenging Bail Granted To UPPCL Former MD Ayodhya Prasad Mishra, Allows Bail To Co-Accused @Gautam_Adv28 reports lawbeat.in/top-stories/su…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt will shortly hear plea by #Gyanvapi Mosque Committee challenging the survey of the disputed site. The debates on the issue centred around whether the structure unearthed was a Shivlinga
Bench assembles.
Bench: the proceedings are going on before the trial court right? We were just wondering this SLP arose from the order appointing the commissioner. Now everything would depend on what view the district court. The commissioner’s report is on record.
BREAKING: In a plea for termination of pregnancy by an unmarried woman who is almost 24 weeks pregnant. #SupremeCourt asks AIIMS to constitute a board of medical practitioners to to evaluate whether the foetus can be aborted without any danger to her life.
The court has directed AIIMS to carry out the abortion if the board finds fit. The court has remarked “The petitioner should not be denied benefits merely because she is unmarried.” #SupremeCourt
On July 15, Delhi HC had rejected plea of the woman seeking termination of pregnancy, who was slated to complete 24 weeks in 3 days.
Supreme Court has allowed the plea basis medical opinion. The law currently allows termination of pregnancy in the following cases:
Counsel informs the bench that other related matters are listed on July 27.
The Court have said that there is a requirement of AG in this matter while asking the counsels to wait.
The bench said that the Secretary may be directed to compile details from all the States whether the judgment in case of Poonawala, Khap Panchayat (Shakti Vahani), Pravasi Sangathan matters.
Preventive directions have been passed in these cases.
#SupremeCourt hearing a batch of petitions challenging Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 and Cable Television Network (Amendment) 2021.
Earlier, the Court had directed to prepare a chart of cases involving:
"1. Challenge to #ITRules 2. Challenge to Cable TV rules 3. Petitions seeking directions over IT Rules. 4. Other set of cases involving instances of #HateSpeeches and #HateCrime." #InformationTechnology
Counsel informed the bench that the batch of petitions seeking IT Rules have become infructuous as the rules have been made.
#SupremeCourt hearing the plea filed by State of Tamil Nadu seeking urgent orders
restraining the #CauveryWater Management Authority to implement the Tribunal order as modified by Supreme Court Court from deliberating the proposed construction of reservoir at Mekedatu.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for Tamil Nadu submits that the
proposed Mekedatu Reservoir Project of Karnataka is
detrimental to the interest of the farmers of Tamil
Nadu.
Senior Advocate Shyam Diwan appearing for the State of Karnataka submits, Milords it is a disposes of matter, there is no question of impacting the flow of the water.
Justice Khanwilkar: The question is whether this Authority has jurisdiction.
It is has been alleged that the elections have been postponed "without any reasonable grounds", and solely on the basis of "unofficial communication" from the Government of India. #MunicipalElection
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for AAP submits that delimitation is no excuse and the elections shall be commenced immidiately.