Dean Burnett Profile picture
Jul 27 34 tweets 11 min read
Taken me several days to answer this, because migraines have long been a gap in my knowledge

Can't feel too bad though, because the science of #migraines is WAY more complex and uncertain than most would have thought

Here's what's known

Strap in, this will get complicated

/1
What is the root cause of migraines? Currently 'TBC', unfortunately.

But evidence suggests it involves neurological, vascular, hormonal and genetic factors are working in concert

Applies to pretty much anything in the brain, it never makes it easy

/2
But if there IS one specific 'root cause' of migraines, most fingers point to Cortical Spreading Depression, CSD

What's that?

It's when a neuron, brain cell, experiences a sudden burst of activity (depolarisation), followed by a period of inactivity, as if it's exhausted

/3
But because neurons in the brain are interconnected and communicative, this sudden burst of activity followed by inactivity spreads to the neighbouring neurons and beyond, so you get a 'wave' of this bizarre neuronal activity, travelling along the brain.

/4
The weird thing here is, while neurons can normally bounce signals and activity around your brain at something close to the speed of sound, in comparison this Cortical Spreading Depression wave travels veeeery slooooowwwwlllyyy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortical_…

/5
Whereas neuronal signals are normally batted around hyper quick like messages in a busy WhatsApp group, Cortical Spreading Depression diffuses through the brain cells like a drop of ink on a bit of kitchen roll or blotting paper.

It's a gradual thing, basically

/6
Consensus is that Cortical Spreading Depression occurring in the brain leads to migraines, albeit via a still-unclear mechanism. But 'brain cells not doing what they're technically meant to be doing' invariably ends in physical/mental issues of some sort, so it makes sense

/7
Cortical Spreading Depression being the underlying cause of migraines also makes sense when you consider the very slow speed of it. That would explain why #migraines last so long, and also how you can 'feel them coming', via the prodrome stage etc.

americanmigrainefoundation.org/resource-libra….

/8
If you're a regular migraine sufferer, your brain will have ample time to learn to recognise the early sensations of a Cortical Spreading Depression occurrence, and that it means bad stuff is coming in a few hours. Because of the bizarre slow progress of the activity

/9
Aside: Am I OK to say 'migraine *sufferers'? I don't with mental health issues as it's often unhelpful to assign clear (negative) value judgements, but I've not met anyone who experiences migraines whose attitude is anything other than 'THIS IS BULLSH*T MAKE IT STOP!"

/10
But even if we accept that a slow-moving wave of neuronal depolarisation and subsequent inactivity are what leads to a #migraine... how? How do we get from A to B?

Well, that's less clear. There are a lot of contenders though, and it's widely agreed that all play a role

/11
Hardly surprising, though, that 'a wave of anomalous neural activity is spreading through the fundamental areas of the brain' leads to bad stuff happening. Like saying "We released an enraged bull in a busy supermarket, it resulted in a mess". Yeah, ya reckon?

/12
But anyway

This spreading wave of atypical neuronal activity affects many things that could feasibly lead to #Migraine.

One that many agree is particularly important is the effects it has on blood vessels in our brain and head

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…

/13
Because of the way it feels, migraine was believed to be a vascular issue for many years, not a neurological one. But modern evidence argues that it's like to be a combination, because of course it is

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…

/14
In truth, drawing a distinct divide between neurological and vascular at this cellular level is probably pointless. Neurons depend on changes in blood vessels to do what they do, and neurons regularly directly change the properties of blood vessels while doing what they do

/15
Ultimately, changes in the behaviour of blood vessels to important regions of the brain and surrounding tissue (like the meninges) can be just as impactful/disruptive as changes in neural activity. There's a lot of overlap. All can/do contribute to migraine.

/16
There's a lot of scientific back and forth as exactly what part of the brain or surrounding tissue, and whether it's more neural or vascular, is the case with migraines. It's all ongoing. But, as ever, the most likely answer is that they all factor in

/17
There are some particular areas of interest

Much #migraine research focuses on the trigeminal nerve

beyondexceptionaldentistry.com/blog/where-mig…

The fifth cranial nerve, it is a triple-branched nerve that supplies information from the head and face to the brain, and provides muscular control

/18
The trigeminal nerve, among other things, transmits sensations of pain from the face and jaw, which is apparently a common experience for migraine sufferers?

nhs.uk/ipgmedia/natio…

Would be consistent with the trigeminal nerve having a key role, in any case.

/19
One argument is that the Cortical Spreading Depression causes vasoconstriction (expansion of blood vessels) in the trigeminal nerve, putting pressure on it, which is interpreted by your brain as pain. Because that's how it usually experiences such things.

/20
Could also explain some links between stress and migraine. Stress can often be expressed by jaw clenching and similar unthinking responses. If your trigeminal nerve is already prone to #migraine, this could cause even more pressure on it, triggering an attack.

/21
Others point to the tissues surrounding the brain, like the meninges, suggesting they can be briefly inflamed, or affected by the anomalous neural activity, and thus experience blood vessel expansion and subsequent pain

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19457286/#:~:t….

It's all a rich tapestry

/22
There's buckets of complex stuff I haven't even begun to address yet, but that's just how complex migraines are.

But here are two of the more interesting aspects, I'd argue.

/23
One is that man migraine sufferers also regularly experience auras. Usually visual, but not always. Essentially, a migraine makes your vision go weird, you see blank patches or weird patterns, none of which is actually there. They're often a sign that a migraine is incoming

/24
What's happening when you experience a visual aura? Well the Cortical Spreading Depression, the slow moving wave of anomalous neural activity, has got to your visual cortex, causing unusual and baffling signals that your brain tries to make sense of in your perception

/25
It's sort of like your vision is a cinema projector and the underlying migraine activity has flicked paint on the lens, so you get these weird patterns on the screen that aren't related to anything on the film.

/26
Auras can occur via the other senses too, but then that makes sense as the underlying anomalous migraine activity can spread to the brain regions that process those sense too.

/27
Then there's this; neurons behind the activity underlying #migraines are thought to be regulated primarily by two chemicals in particular

Our old pall serotonin

science.org/content/articl…)%20which%20increases%20during%20attacks.

...and oestrogen

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

/28
This offers an explanation as to why, by and large, #migraines affect mostly women.

While men do have and are indeed dependant on oestrogen in many ways, it has a more prominent role in female brains and bodies

Unfortunately, this involves migraine processes.

/29
Insufficient or anomalous oestrogen levels have been associated with migraines, and it may be that, in some cases, that kicks off the whole wave of activity that induces migraines in women. So, that's fun.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

/30
The interplay between migraines and oestrogen could explain why birth control like the pill has been reported as leading to migraines, or other observations that women experience fewer/no migraines in late stage pregnancy or post-menopause

/31
Ultimately, pregnancy and/or menopause does many things, but among those are radically altering the usual activity of oestrogen in the body. That this could lead to fewer migraines being triggered isn't especially far fetched.

/32
Again, there's way more migraines that I've not even brought up yet. Will do a more extensive article about it somewhere proper because a Twitter thread isn't the ideal conduit for it.

But yeah, #Migraines. They suck big time, but are scientifically fascinating, I guess.

/33
At this point I usually point people at my books, but none of them have anything about Migraines. Would still be cool if you bought one/some though, means I can spaff my day away doing long-winded Twitter threads

amazon.co.uk/Books-Dean-Bur…

#Migraines #SciComm #Neuro #Brains

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dean Burnett

Dean Burnett Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garwboy

Jul 22
My critique of that 'Depression isn't due to a chemical imbalance' paper led to another common claim/concern; antidepressants are 'no better than placebos'

Rather than a 'gotcha', I'd argue the placebo effect is meaningless in #mentalhealth disorders. Here's my thinking

/1
We all know what the placebo effect is? The phenomenon where people experience tangible benefits from something that they only *think* is medicine. It shows just how intertwined brain and body are. But it's also often exploited (e.g. alt med stuff)

verywellmind.com/what-is-the-pl…

/2
When you're trialling a drug, you have to account for the placebo effect. If you've got, for example, a new antiviral, you give it to relevant and willing subjects and see if they feel better. If they do, it means it works!

...unless it's the placebo effect

/3
Read 23 tweets
Jul 20
Depression is probably not caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain – new study

theconversation.com/depression-is-…

A few have asked me for my thoughts on this, so here's a thread

But basically; I agree. So much so, I've been saying it in most of my writing for 5+ years now

/1
You can see where the 'depression is due to a chemical imbalance in the brain' theory came from. Antidepressants were discovered (by accident), and they caused an increase in certain chemicals in the brain, reducing depressive symptoms. Ergo, depression = low chemicals

/2
Except since then, ample evidence has accumulated to show that depression is far more complex a thing than can be explained by 'not enough brain chemicals', and there are a lot more theories and models out there now that try to explain it more thoroughly

/3
Read 26 tweets
Jul 13
Meant to address this over a week ago but, ironically, I've had Covid, so not been up to it.

But with cases rising alarmingly and there being a decent chance they'll be reintroduced, here are some psychological explanations for resistance to #facemasks

/1
The most obvious and fundamental mechanism behind objection to wearing #Facemasks is simple 'reactance'

Basically, the human brain likes autonomy, and instinctively objects, reacts, to anything that reduces it

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P….

/2
In many cases, the context doesn't matter as much as the innate resistance to having your autonomy reduced. In this case, the fact that it's the government (or whoever) telling people they MUST wear a mask, rather than requesting it, means they resist doing so.

/3
Read 21 tweets
Apr 9
Right, following on from this thread about #IntrusuveThoughts, a lot of people have commented about embarrassing memories that pop up out of the blue and make them cringe all over again.

That's a different, if related, phenomenon. Here's my understanding of why it happens

/1
First and foremost, it's important to recognise that the fundamentals of the human brain's memory system were laid down looooong ago. Before we were even human. Consciousness and rational thought are far more recent developments, evolutionary-speaking

/2
One upshot of this is that our memory system is often the result of new software running on old hardware.

A lot of the brain is like this, in fairness, and it causes a lot of issues. I *may* have written a book all about it

amazon.co.uk/Idiot-Brain-Ne…

/3
Read 27 tweets
Apr 8
Ok so this is actually quite a common thing. It's 'intrusive thoughts', and it's invariably a harmless, sometimes even helpful, phenomenon. It's often just the sign of a human brain operating as normal. That said, things can go wrong.

WHY does it happen? Well...

/1
One particularly useful power of the human brain is its ability to create simulations and scenarios. i.e. we have a powerful imagination
But it's not used solely for fantastical stuff; a lot of the time we use it to model scenarios of everyday things that might/could happen

/2
Basically, our brain is pretty much constantly coming up with hypotheticals. "What if this happened?" "What if that occurred?" "What if I did this?" "What if they did that?" etc.
This helps shape, guide, and reinforce our decision making and behaviour

#IntrusiveThoughts

/3
Read 24 tweets
Jan 9
The more I've thought about this, the more I feel it really boils my p*ss.

It takes everything that decent conscientious science, academic, and investigative writers do (and yeah, I include myself in this), and gleefully spits in our face

/1
It takes most multiple attempts to get just one book published. If they succeed at all. Which the majority don't

IMHO, getting a book published is a privilege that should be respected, not a God given right for you to spew any old shite at a potential readership

/2
And that's doubly true if you're claiming to be imparting important, potentially-life-altering ideas and notions to anyone who might read it. In that case, you should be doubly sure your claims and arguments are solid, backed up by evidence, even if just from a moral POV

/3
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(