So many American and Canadian parents of autistic children are being given no options but ABA. If they refuse direct ABA, people in charge slip the ABA methods into speech therapy, classroom practices or anywhere they can.
I'm seeing parents ask in Facebook groups how they...
...can get their children out of this, but they are being blocked all over. Even when officials agree not to use ABA, things happen that lead them to investigate what's going on, and you find out ABA-based approaches were used anyway, they just didn't call it that.
While all these people have this odd idea about 'evidence-based practice', they are unable to face the evidence playing out in front of them.
Once an autistic man and I did a talk at a school for autistic children, and afterwards a leading teacher (HOD) who was retiring after many years of service and going into private practice chatted to us further.
She was surprised to learn from us that many autistic people experience hyperempathy, because she'd been taught we don't experience empathy.
"But haven't you noticed..." I began, and described the many ways in which children's hyperempathy shows in a classroom situation, like how they read your mood and react to the vibes you bring into the room from home.
"Yes, wow," she mused, saying that she'd experienced that for sure, she just never made the connection before.
And this wasn't even a North American school where they do ABA; it's a well-known South African school for autistic children, mainly centred around TEACCH.
This is why the number of years someone has spent working with autistic people means NOTHING to me.
You can be there all those years and still not understand the basics, because you're still viewing every experience through the lens of what you were taught, which was distorted.
There's got to be a different way of training 'special needs' professionals.
If every step of the educator or therapist's learning is based on ableism, encrusted with ableism, designed to reinforce, reward and celebrate ableism, then don't be surprised if every aspect of your autistic child's education is informed by... ableism.
I think I need to point out that the same thing applies to us at autistic activists. We can easily think that because we're autistic ourselves, and we have a big Twitter/TikTok following, or we wrote a book and we know not to say 'low-functioning', we must be an 'autism expert'.
Just when I think I know the basics of autism and the most salient factors in autistic health and communication struggles (my focus areas in advocacy), some new piece of information comes along and shakes my whole paradigm.
Some of the keywords and names that mark key points along my learning journey (in no particular order):
Motor loops.
Ion channels and channelopathies.
Intersectionality.
Anti-racism.
Craniocervical instability (CCI), Chiari Type II malformation, tethered cord.
Vagus nerve.
Disability (versus disorder), the social model of disability, and the human rights approach to disability.
Dan Bergmann and Elizabeth Bonker.
Amy Sequenzia.
Plural people.
I don't think most of these are normally on the list of topics in any standard autism course. (If there is such a thing as a standard autism course!)
More:
Temporal lobe epilepsy.
Apraxia, disinhibition, dysregulation and the cerebellum.
Arnstein's Ladder of Participation (thanks, @AnnMemmott).
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/connective tissue disorders and mast cell disorders.
There's this refrain among ABA people, that's the equivalent of saying lalalala whilst blocking your ears when you don't want to listen to anyone. It's a similarly meaningless sound. It goes like this:
Why meaningless? I mean, 'evidence-based' sounds sooo scientific and logical and formal and true and trustworthy.
So, I'm working on a thread to explain the poppycock reasoning behind ABA's 'evidence-based' chorus, but until the thread has more substance to it, you can follow @KristenBott, one of the researchers who's published papers on these evidence claims.
[THREAD] This thread is going to be about what it means for a therapy to be 'evidence-based', and in particular, what ABA therapists think 'evidence' is, how bizarre their ideas sometimes are, and how they can sometimes look straight at real evidence and not see it.
I need to talk about this diagram. Rather than add a lengthy image description, I'll just link to this and add more detail later in the thread as I explain the relevance of this pyramid: academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/textev…
I'm going to explain how the ABA research industry's refusal to respect disability rights has led to a paradoxical flipping of this pyramid, so that the evidence upon which they base their claims is of low quality.
There's a school for autistic children who wants to name a classroom after me because according to the principal they've learned more from me over the years than from anyone else.
They want to use some of my artwork prints to decorate the classroom.
Other classrooms will also be themed and named after people.
I guess that this is like houses which we had at my own school, which were named after old men who played some forgotten role in the school history. Except this school is small, so it's classrooms, not houses.
[THREAD] It appears that most of the autism training given to teachers and autism professionals is based on a science fiction book from 1997...
...about an imaginary alien civilisation in decline, and the villains in power are trying to turn the inhabitants of some planet into robots because they don't know how to build robots, but some dying robot told them to do that,...
...otherwise the planet's infrastructure would assert itself like ivy and take over and no longer serve the alpha beings.
I want to tell you something that many people in the autism industry don't know:
Many well-known autistic activists in your local community and the international autism advocacy community ARE STILL BEING ABUSED BY THEIR PARENTS and they can't afford to tell the world.
Many.
Some of them lead or moderate support groups on Facebook.
Some of them arrange outings for autistic people and support communication rights for nonspeaking people.