Josh Gerstein Profile picture
Aug 1 6 tweets 2 min read
HAPPENING NOW: Sentencing underway for Guy Reffitt, 1st #Jan6 defendant to go to jury trial, which ended with five felony convictions. Among those charges: witness tampering for threatening his own son. Earlier: politi.co/3MzkCvy
Judge Friedrich says she concerned that govt request for 15 years is far beyond what others have gotten. Judge: 'His decision to exercise his constitutional right to go to trial should not result in a dramatically different sentence.'
Friedrich: 'The government is asking for a sentence that is three times as long as any other defendant and the defendant did not assault an officer.' She acknowledges he was convicted of being in possession of firearm on Capitol grounds.
Says it is 'close call,' but she will not apply the guidelines enhancement for taking a leadership role. Says his preparation is covered by other enhancement. We still haven't gotten to terror enhancement, but judge seems to be signaling that the rules overstate his role here
NEWS: Judge denies terrorism enhancement to sentence for Reffitt. Says it would cause 'unwarranted sentencing disparity' because prosecutors have not sought it in other Jan. 6 cases.
Friedrich, a Trump appointee, has not imposed sentence yet and court is in brief recess. This means Reffitt is likely to get a sentence similar to the most severe thus far in other Jan. 6 cases, which was 63 months.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Gerstein

Josh Gerstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshgerstein

Aug 2
HAPPENING NOW: Judge Metha holding pretrial conference re Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy trial now set for Sept. 26. Defense seeking to delay it due to House #Jan6. Haven't got to that yet. Discussing jury selection
Mehta re questionnaire: 'Brevity is better here….nobody wants to have a 2 week jury selection.' Also he says he thinks open-ended Qs about media consumption may be unhelpful (doesn't mention if they're improper).
Rhodes lawyer Linder says defense recently had a three-day 'work weekend' for several defense attys in Dallas where they worked on questionnaire and stipulations. Linder: 'We are making big striders to getting ready...I don't think we can realistically be ready in Sept.'
Read 26 tweets
Aug 2
So, here's the main thing I was left wondering after today: If the evidence shows Reffitt was planning to 'overtake our government,' we have a law for that: sedition. So, why were the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers' charged with that and not Reffitt? Was it just timing?
He was set for trial in February when DOJ brought 1st seditious conspiracy cases in Jan. 2022. Adding sedition might've caused his trial to be delayed. Maybe prosecutors worried they'd lose the sedition count in a case where jurors had many other options & deft seemed scattered?
Still, a bit odd to argue at sentencing that Reffitt 'wasn't here as a Trump supporter' but favored for a prolonged period overthrowing the whole Congress, but to charge him with obstructing a govt proceeding (& other things) and stop short of the sedition charge
Read 4 tweets
Jul 22
Gaston: This case is not complicated but it is important. This is a simple case about a man, that man, Steve Bannon, who didn’t show up....When it really comes down to it, he did not want to recognize Congress’ authority or play by the government’s rules.'
Nichols in jury instructions and just told jurors that neither executive privilege nor any other legal claim is a valid defense to the charged crime--a key issue in the case. Now prosecution beginning closing arguments.
Gaston scoffs at defense claims he may have been confused about the deadline or what he had to do. Showing subpoena on TV, she says: 'This document is not hard to understand.' Of his failure: 'Was that a mistake? No, that was intentional.'
Read 15 tweets
Jul 22
HAPPENING NOW: Jury instructions & closing arguments about to get underway at Steve Bannon contempt of Congress trial. Looks like AUSA Molly Gaston will deliver the govt closing (at least 1st part). Earlier: politi.co/3OktjcV
Bannon's lawyers just filed notice about House #jan6 committee's mentions of Bannon last night, including audio from @motherjones of Bannon predicting before 202 election that Trump would contest it even if he lost. Defense has said this could infect jury and wants some inquiry
That filing: bit.ly/3zqn4A3 Judge Nichols taking bench now
Read 5 tweets
Jul 21
COURT RESUMING at Bannon trial: This morning we learned Bannon won't testify and defense doesn't plan to put on any case. Judge now hearing defense presentation about why they needed Jan. 6 panel chairman Bennie Thompson or other members as witnesses
Judge Nichols again reminds that he threw out Bannon's main potential defenses because he thought they are precluded. Nichols: 'I was bound by D.C. Circuit precedent that I’m not even sure is right.'
Schoen now trying to explain why Bannon needed Thompson and perhaps other #J6 committee members and the 1 panel staffer witness (Chief Counsel Kristen Amerling) wasn't sufficient
Read 14 tweets
Jul 21
HAPPENING NOW: Bannon trial getting underway at US Dist Court in DC. Preliminaries as we await jury. Govt rested yesterday. Unclear whether defense plans to present any case. Discussing now timing of various motions and closing. politi.co/3PDbTJu
Judge now discussing whether it was proper for defense to say in front of jury that defense planned to move judge to dismiss case. Common motion but not commonly raised in front of the jury.
Def. atty Corcoran: 'We don't think that passing comment in front of the jury was prejudicial' to either party. But judge says it may have been prejudicial to Bannon b/c assuming Nichols turns down the motion then jury may think he's validated government case
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(