GET A GRIP Profile picture
Aug 20, 2022 24 tweets 7 min read Read on X
#THREAD

How did Hitler seize power?

In January 1933, Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. He led the right-wing Nazi Party which had received just 33% of the vote. Over the next 18 months, Hitler would eliminate nearly all sources of opposition...

bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guide…
Step 1: Gaining control of the Reichstag: January - March 1933.

Hitler needed to gain control of two-thirds of the seats in order to change the constitution, so he called a new election for March 1933. A few days before the election, the Reichstag building was set on fire.
Hitler used the fire as an excuse to claim there was a communist plot to overthrow the Govt, a powerful persuasive trope still applied widely in the billionaire-owned UK media to many situations, from #BlackLivesMatter & Opposition Party Leaders, to Unions & "woke Universities". ImageImage
The President, who had the power to issue a decree in an emergency, approved the Law for the Protection of People and State, which like so much recent Tory legislation, from the criminalisation of protest to the Nationality & Borders Bill, removed many people’s civil rights. Image
Anyone suspected of plotting against the government could be arrested & imprisoned without trial.

Hitler used the decree to disrupt the election campaigns of his main rivals by putting them in prison, confiscating literature, & using the Brownshirts to break-up their meetings. Image
A few days after the fire, in the election on 5 March 1933, 44% of the German people voted for the Nazis, who won 288 seats in the Reichstag. This was still not the two-thirds majority Hitler needed, but Hitler was able to secure the passing of the Enabling Act.
To pass the Enabling Act, Hitler using the Protection of People & State to ban the Communist Party; had some non-Nazi deputies arrested; persuaded the Nationalist Party to support him; & obtained the Centre Party’s obedience by promising to protect the rights of Catholics.
The Enabling Act gave Hitler the right to make laws without the Reichstag’s approval for the next four years, giving Hitler absolute power to make laws, which enabled him to destroy all opposition to his rule, & remove the Reichstag as a source of opposition.
Step 2: Creating a one-party state

Within months. Hitler removed most sources of political opposition. He merged the Nazi & the Nationalist Parties & the Centre (Catholic) Party disbanded in return for Hitler agreeing not to interfere in Catholic schools and youth movements.
Socialists, communists & other left-wing activists who had not already fled, were put in prison.

In April 1933, Nazis took over key posts in local governments. Jews & other political enemies were removed from the civil service. In July 1933, other political parties were banned.
The Law Against the Formation of New Parties meant only the Nazi Party was allowed to exist. Therefore, when the Reichstag & local governments met, which was infrequently, all the deputies were Nazis.

Germany had become a one-party state, destroying democracy in the country.
Step 3: Eliminating opposition on the Night of the Long Knives

The SA was a paramilitary group set up by Hitler in 1921 to attack political rivals & had been important in getting Hitler into power & in securing the Enabling Act, but by 1934 Hitler wanted to get rid of it. ImageImage
Hitler had a number of motives for wanting to eliminate the SA:

The SA was demanding the Nazis introduce major social change, but Hitler was worried their left-wing ideas would alienate the groups he depended on most - the middle class, businessmen, & industrialists. Image
The SA had 2million members & it wanted to take over the much smaller army. Hitler did not want to annoy the military because it could overthrow him & he needed them to co-operate with his ambitious foreign policy. Hitler believed the SA could stop him achieving a dictatorship.
On 30 June 1934, Hitler ordered the SS (Hitler's personal body guards) to murder around 400 people, including SA leader, Ernst Röhm. They were mostly SA leaders but also a number of other opponents Hitler wanted to eliminate, like the previous Chancellor, Kurt von Schleicher.
Hitler justified the slaughter by accusing the SA of being gay & plotting against Germany.

The Reichstag passed a law retrospectively legalising the Night of the Long Knives, which had destroyed all opposition to Hitler within the Nazi Party, & gave more power to the brutal SS.
Step 4: Making himself Führer

When President Hindenburg died on 2 August, Hitler did not hold an election. Instead, he declared himself jointly President, Chancellor & Head of the Army, becoming known as the Führer (leader), formally making Hitler the absolute ruler of Germany.
Step 5: Ensuring the loyalty of the army

During the Weimar Republic, the army had helped to undermine the government. Hitler was determined this wouldn't happen to him. He increased his popularity with the army by eliminating the SA, which was setting itself up as a rival to it.
Members of the army had to swear a personal Oath of Allegiance (unconditional obedience) to Hitler, not Germany. He also kept the army out of politics by keeping it busy with conscription & later rearmament, putting down any sources of opposition to Hitler within the army.
Step 6: Gleichschaltung

Gleichschaltung meant the co-ordination of all aspects of life in Germany to fit in with Hitler’s ideas and his authority.

Hitler extended his power to key organisations either by taking them over, abolishing them, or doing a deal with them.
In a move that has strong resonance with the rhetoric of Liz Truss, trade unions were abolished.

On 2 May 1933, their leaders were arrested, funds confiscated & strikes declared illegal.

Workers lost the right to negotiate wage increases & improvements in working conditions. ImageImage
All workers had to join the German Labour Front (DAF), which was run by Dr. Robert Ley. Within two years, 20 million workers had joined DAF. They gave up their workers’ rights in return for the perks offered by the new Strength Through Joy movement & because they feared the SS.
The Pope signed The Concordat agreement with Hitler in July 1933. It allowed Hitler to increase his power in Germany without opposition from the Catholic Church, in return for the latter being allowed to run its schools & youth movement without interference.
However, Hitler did not keep his promise, & by 1935 there was friction between the Catholic Church & the Nazis, & Hitler set up the Nazi People's Courts, where judges had to swear an oath of loyalty to the Nazis. By August 1934, Hitler was in full control of Germany.
#NeverForget Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

Feb 6
🧵

Tice amplifies this article by Allison Pearson, which is riddled with factual errors, misleading claims, selective omissions, and hyperbolic sensationalism which attempts to recast Lucy Connolly not as a bigot lawfully convicted of inciting racial hatred, but as a victim. Image
The Telegraph piece isn’t news reporting or balanced commentary - it’s propagandistic advocacy: a highly opinionated defence that relies on cherry-picked extracts from Connolly’s subject access request (SAR), filtered through anonymous barrister commentary and Pearson’s biases.
Where this narrative collides with or contradicts published court judgments, sentencing remarks, and appeal outcomes, attention-seeking propagandist Pearson predictably either downplays, distorts, or completely ignores them.

I've got 10 minutes, so here are the main problems...
Read 45 tweets
Jan 12
🧵 Musk’s ‘Fascist Britain’ Claim Is False

@elonmusk isn’t offering his 200M followers serious political analysis: he’s amplifying repeatedly debunked far-right disinformation and presenting it as evidence that a democratic state is illegitimate. He’s dangerously out of control. Image
The claim about arrests for online comments that Musk boosted originated with anonymous far-right disinformation superspreaer account, “Basil the Great”, well known for passing off unverified rumours as fact when there is zero supporting evidence.

Musk’s latest misleading post centres on a striking but deeply misleading graphic asserting that the UK has “the highest number of arrests for online comments in the world”.

I debunked it September and will now do so again today.

Read 37 tweets
Dec 12, 2025
🧵

Reform UK’s slick, stage-managed launch of a Christian Fellowship in St Michael’s Church is not some harmless Christmas-season publicity stunt. It is a clear and brazen step towards the Trumpification of UK politics, where religion is weaponised as a tool for cultural warfare and political mobilisation.

This is not organic Christian revival. It’s strategic political engineering.

Behind this development sit figures who have spent years trying to inject a US-style fusion of right-wing politics and religious identity into British political culture:

• Paul Marshall

A billionaire media financier with a clear ideological project: to build a hard-right cultural and religious counter-establishment. Through GB “News”, The |Spectator and UnHerd and other platforms he has amplified narratives about “woke attacks” on tradition, identity, and Christianity. The Islamophobic tweets he liked are disgusting. His network provides the media oxygen for precisely the kind of politicised Christianity on display at the Reform launch.

• James Orr

A Cambridge academic and prominent Anglican conservative intellectual, closely connected to the “post-liberal” movement and hard-right US conservative and Hungarian organisations. Orr openly promotes the idea of restoring Britain’s “Christian identity” through politics — a framing that sits uncomfortably close to the Christian-nationalist rhetoric of the US right. His advisory role to senior Reform figures is a clear sign of the ideological hardening underway.

• Danny Kruger

Long known for advocating a more “muscular” Christian politics, Kruger has repeatedly argued that the UK should explicitly root its laws and social policy in “Judeo-Christian values” - a dog whistle I explain in the next tweet.

This is the British echo of US culture-war evangelicalism: turning religion into a political badge, not a spiritual or moral tradition. His involvement in shaping Reform’s policy direction cements the party’s shift toward faith-infused populism.

• Calvin Robinson

Though no longer in the Church of England, disgraced former GBN presenter and political extremist Robinson remains one of the most prominent voices pushing an aggressive “anti-woke, anti-liberal” form of Christianity in the media — including endorsing narratives that paint inclusive or progressive churches as heretical. His alignment with Reform’s messaging shows how the party is deliberately courting polemical, grievance-driven Christian activism.

Together, these figures represent a new coalition: a British attempt to import the US religious-right model, with all its corrosive social consequences.

Using St Michael’s Cornhill — a church rooted in the conservative evangelical network — as the backdrop for this political spectacle is shocking in a UK context.

This is not merely a “religious event attended by politicians.” It was a political rally held in a church, wrapped in Anglican aesthetics.

The Church of England has historically avoided such political entanglement precisely because it knows how dangerous it is to let a religious institution become a vessel for partisan identity politics.

Britain is not America — but Reform UK wants to change that

What we are seeing is the deliberate construction of a political identity rooted in far-right themes lurching toward a contemporary form of Christofascism:

grievance Christianity
nostalgia for a mythic “Christian Britain”
hostility to minorities and multiculturalism
anti-LGBTQ+ theology rebranded as “family values”
anti-immigrant populism framed as moral duty
and a narrative of cultural siege identical to the US evangelical right

It is the Trump playbook, translated into British idiom.

This is disturbing, because once a political movement fuses religious identity with national identity, democratic debate changes: Opponents are no longer wrong — they are heretical. Policies are no longer argued — they are sanctified. Compromise becomes betrayal. And politics becomes a zero-sum culture war.

Britain has largely avoided this polarising poison. Reform UK is now trying to inject it directly into the bloodstream of national politics.

Reform UK’s “Christian Fellowship” is not about faith. It is the public unveiling of a British Christian-nationalist project — backed by wealthy ideologues, amplified by culture-war media, and borrowing heavily from the most divisive elements of the US right.

It is a serious warning sign of where Reform UK intends to take the country: toward a politics defined by religious grievance, cultural division, and the erosion of the pluralistic norms that have protected Britain from the worst excesses of American political extremism.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 9, 2025
🧵

How have populist UK politicians and Britain’s right-wing press and broadcasters got away with repeating — day after day, year after year — the brazenly false and wildly misleading claim that we live in a “high-welfare, high-tax” country? Image
Why the “High-Welfare, High-Tax” Myth Persists.

The claim that Britain is a “high-welfare, high-tax” country is a shameless lie—brazenly false—as OECD and OBR data consistently show: the UK's tax take is ~36% of GDP (mid-table globally, and well under the EU average of 40.5%). Image
The UK's total tax take of 36% is far under France's 45% or Denmark's 46%. Welfare benefits spending (including state pensions) is a modest ~11% of GDP—among the lowest in the OECD, well below the EU average of 17.5%, and just under half that of France (20.5%) and Italy (20%). Image
Read 31 tweets
Dec 8, 2025
🧵

Not only has Nigel Farage shamelessly normalized far right discourse, but Reform UK have welcomed a new generation of young, radicalised, Andrew Tate fanboys who think it's acceptable to spread divisive bigoted lies and disinformation, and to make crass bigoted 'jokes'. Image
Joseph Boam is a radicalised 22-year-old Tate fanboy who started out as a Tory, running as a district councillor, then switching to Reform UK in 2024 and becoming a councillor in May 2025 representing the Whitwick division on Leicestershire County Council for the Reform UK party. Image
A former KFC worker, who has worked with his dad on sheds and property renovation, despite his total lack of any relevant experience or knowledge of the area, he was appointed Council deputy leader and cabinet member for adult social care—which ispatently absurd. Image
Read 14 tweets
Dec 5, 2025
🧵

‘The Psychology of the New Far Right: Privilege, Fear, and Media Power in the Rise of Authoritarianism.’

Fear, belonging, and power are being manipulated into a frightening new age of populist outrage and algorithmic media, argues Dr Russell Jackson.

bylinesupplement.com/p/the-psycholo…
I've reproduced the article in 🧵 form, below, because its a subscriber only article from @BylineTimes.

You can subscribe here, and I would encourage you to - Bylines tells the stories and undertakes investigations many national news media fear to.

subscribe.bylinetimes.com
Across the West, figures such as Trump, JD Vance, Farage, Johnson, Tice, Kruger, and Lowe helped normalise far-right populist rhetoric within mainstream politics. Their appeal is anti-elite—yet they themselves embody the privilege they claim to challenge.

populismstudies.org
Read 91 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(