When you think you are late, you probably aren't.

I'm talking about investing in the exponential age of course.

Let me give you an example.

Do you know what this chart is?
I'll give you some hints:
- This is a price evolution chart.
- It is using a linear scale.
- It covers several years.
- It isn't Bitcoin.

Any idea?
Ok, well there you go, this is a chart of Amazon's stock value since its IPO in 1997.

Check it out with the labels.
The total return since the IPO is 115,000%.

That's a lot.

So we might as well use a log scale to see what's really going on.
Now this is a log2 scales which means that every break you see on the vertical axis of this chart corresponds to a doubling of the stock value of Amazon.

Since the bottom of the Dotcom crash in 2002, Amazon has seen its share price double roughly every two years.
That means if you had invested $10k on Amazon at the bottom of the Dotcom crash you would now have $5m.

Of course Amazon was down 90% from its all time high.

So chances are you would have thought it is too late...
If you had invested $10k in Amazon a few years later during the Great Recession it would now be worth $800k.

But you probably wouldn't have because the future is too uncertain during a recession…
If you had invested $10k in Amazon in 2012 it would now be worth $160k.

But in 2012 Amazon was already a $100bn company by market cap. So for sure it is too late, they are going to start hitting diminishing returns…
I hope you start to see a pattern here.

What we are really talking about is missing the exponential trend.

And the reason for that is most people have the wrong intuition about exponential growth.
Take this classical example.

A piece of paper is typically 2mm thick.

How many times do you need to fold it on itself to make something as high as Mt Everest?
The answer is only 27 times.

Every time you fold the paper you double its thickness.

At the beginning it doesn't look like much.

Fold 1, 4mm
Fold 2, 8mm
Fold 3, 16mm
But by fold 24 you have already reached a thickness of 858m.

That's taller than the Burj Khalifa tower.

Two more folds and you get to about half the height of Mt Everest.
Two more folds again and you have a piece of paper 13km thick which is taller than Mt Everest.

That was quick.

This is the big difference between linear and exponential growth.

+2 vs x2 as @JackButcher would put it.
As we have seen on the example of Amazon, some assets grow in value at an exponential rate.

As a matter of fact any asset whose value is based on the combination of technology and network effect is susceptible to experience exponential growth.
The beauty of those assets is that you don't need to make a huge initial investment to generate outsized dollar returns.

Even 2mm folded onto itself a few times will get you on top of Mt Everest.
And as a side effect that means you don’t need to have great stock picking skills to bet on the exponential trends.

Since even a small amount invested early gives you massive returns you can afford to spread your bets and increase your chances of riding the big wave.
This is the fundamental shift you need to make to be a successful investor in the exponential age.

Your job is to identify those exponential trends and ride them efficiently.

Most of the time that means focusing on the big picture instead of getting stuck in the details.
Alright, that's it for today!

If you want to read more about macro economics, digital assets and investment strategies backed by data go subscribe to the Ecoinometrics newsletter.

ecoinometrics.substack.com
If you are looking for a starting point, we discussed dollar cost averaging vs lump sum investing for exponential trends over here.
ecoinometrics.substack.com/p/ecoinometric…
We also recently looked at 80 years of history to find out which assets you need to own to beat inflation over different time horizons. You might want to check out this one too.
ecoinometrics.com/where-should-y…
And don’t forget to follow @ecoinometrics so you don’t miss the charts and the latest articles.
If you want to go further down the rabbit hole of the exponential age and what it means for your portfolio I also recommend you go checkout @RaoulGMI.

This one is a good starting point:
And if you want more about Amazon I highly recommend you checkout the always excellent @AcquiredFM podcast.

Their most recent episode is telling the story of Amazon dot com.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ecoinometrics

ecoinometrics Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ecoinometrics

Jul 1
Long Term Capital Management was THE giant hedge fund of the 90s.

Started by superstar trader John Meriwether, it basically printed money.

Until it suddenly collapsed and almost took away most major US banks with it.

Here is the story of the granddaddy of leveraged blowups.🧵 Image
Long Term Capital Management or LTCM was founded in 1994 by John Meriwether.

Prior to that John was a superstar bonds trader at Salomon Brothers.

His specialty? Arbitrage.
An arbitrage is simply a trade that takes advantage of the tiny difference in price between equivalent assets in different markets.
Read 21 tweets
Jun 21
Bear markets aren’t made to cry in the fetal position in the corner of the shower.

Believe it or not, they are a great time to hunt for asymmetric bets.

So maybe it is time to be an optimist.

Bear with me 🧵
Inflation is sticky and the Federal Reserve is starting to hit risk assets with the big stick.

So you might be tempted to call it quits and go cry in the shower.

But the thing is bear markets don’t last forever.
Yes inflation is at a 40 years high.

Yes it is the largest gap between the Fed Funds rate and inflation on record.

Yes the Federal Reserve is going to use the full force of QT to bring it down. Image
Read 23 tweets
Jun 19
The Federal Reserve’s stated goal is to get inflation back at 2%.

Their main tool for that: make you poor. 🧵
Inflation is at a 40-year high in the US.

To put that in perspective, if inflation average at 8.6% over the next 8 years, your purchasing power will be divided by two over the same period.

Clearly this is some serious issue. Image
Reading the statement from the latest FOMC meeting, inflation is caused by:

• High oil prices.
• Supply chain disruptions.
• COVID lockdowns in China.
• Putin.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 18
Charts of the week:

• How much is the Fed lagging inflation?
• Is the UST 10-year yield breaking the long term trend?
• How large is this bond market crash?
• Is #Bitcoin a risk asset?
• Is it a good time to go long #BTC?

See below
👇📈📊📉👇
Largest gap on record between the Fed Funds Rate and inflation.

You can barely see the uptick in the Fed Funds Rate on this chart.

Talk to me about fighting inflation.
The 10-year tends to rise in anticipation of rate hikes.

But since the 80s that hasn't been enough to break the long term trend.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 17
Maybe just looking at the inflation rate is a little abstract.

So another way of thinking about that is to see how much purchasing power you will lose if inflation continues at the same rate for 5 years.

See for yourself.
It is not like you can escape inflation by investing in "safe" government bonds either.

In February you were getting a negative real yield almost everywhere.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9
{1/11} We were already in a bad spot with inflation going the way of the 1970s.

But with the Ukraine war and the economic sanctions against Russia all bets are off. 📈👀
{2/11} For context, the US just banned the import of Russian oil.

But Russian oil is no small matter, depending on which year you look at they are in a tie with Saudi Arabia as the second largest producer in the world. 📊🤔
{3/11} You don’t replace 9 million barrels per day that easily.

Especially since this is happening on the background of a tight supply and already record high oil prices at this strength of the US$. 📈🧐👇
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(