#SupremeCourt was hearing a PIL asking that govt forms have option of 'Indian' against religion and caste columns
SC: those who do not want take benefit under law or constitution, need not disclose it, then you indicate it and leave the space blank.But if you want to take ...
benefit then you will have to write the caste. Put a dash!
Justice Rastogi: the school make theirs own format. These certificates are required if you want to take the benefits and then it has to be filled.
Lawyer requested Bench to issue notice authorities to ...
...Explain how he was forced to write his caste.
SC: let the concerned person file or child come to us if that is the case. These cartificates are only required only if you want benefit. this we won’t entertain. There is nothing here. People only file petition for satisfaction.
Petition dismissed. Order notes that under Articles 15-16 only citizens who want to avail benefit can file the caste certificate, and have to fill in details.
The Supreme Court will shortly hear a petition challenging the practice of Talaq-e-Hasan by which a Muslim man can divorce his wife by saying the word "talaq" once a month, for three months.
AAI submits affidavit: There are 123 applications received, 104 have been granted and 19 are pending.
We refer to civil aviation height restriction rules of 2015 under the aircraft act.
Under Rule 4, schedule 2, calculations are mentioned.
Yashwant Shenoy, petitioner in person - rules are standard, provides for when will extra height be given. Amendment made to this. You get a certificate of no objection valid for 12 years, but once an obstacle always an obstacle.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by former Gujarat cop Sanjiv Bhatt, seeking relief in connection with a case of custodial death for which he is serving a life term.
Bench of Justices MR Shah and BB Nagarathna hearing matter.
Counsel seeks adjournment.
Adv: Sorry i don't know if my lords could get the letter on time. I wanted adv Kamini Jaiswal to argue she's not available.
Justice Shah: This is a matter from 1992, since then prosecution is on. I read the letter at 6.30am
Justice BV Nagarathna: I read it at 7.
SC: We'll impose costs. Ms Jaiswal said no?
Adv: Could not contact her yesterday late night.
Order: List on September 5. Rs 25k costs.
Adv: I'll pay from my own pockets, not my client's fault.
Bench discusses [unclear if cost removed].
Bombay High Court hearing the suo motu case initiated against the decision of the Maharashtra government to halt its project of publishing the literature of Dr BR Ambedkar expressed its dissatisfaction on the affidavit filed by State on the status.
Court: Who is assisting the committee (set up by the State), who is the Chairman? The state govenment is not giving any detils, we find out details from the newspaper.
Bench of Justices PB Varale and Kishore Sant: You told us that State has constituted a committee. But the Committee conducted meetings on so and so dates.
Bombay High Court is hearing plea seeking transfer of investigation into the murder of Communist Party of India politician Govind Pansare to the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS).
Sr Adv Ashok Mundargi stated that they need time to get instructions on the application filed. He stated that the IO which is to replace the previous officer is also indisposed.